Department of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Goethestrasse 70, 80336, Munich, Germany.
Biomaterials Department, Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Cairo University, 11, Al-Saray Str., Kasr El Ainy, Manial, Cairo, 11451, Egypt.
Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Jun;22(5):2047-2056. doi: 10.1007/s00784-017-2304-y. Epub 2017 Dec 16.
The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of cavity configuration on the shrinkage vectors of a flowable resin-based composite (RBC) placed in occlusal cavities.
Twenty-seven human molars were divided into three groups (n = 9) according to cavity configuration: "adhesive," "diverging," and "cylindrical." The "adhesive" cavity represented beveled enamel margins and occlusally converging walls, the "diverging" cavity had occlusally diverging walls, and the "cylindrical" cavity had parallel walls (diameter = 6 mm); all cavities were 3 mm deep. Each prepared cavity was treated with a self-etch adhesive (Adper Easy Bond, 3 M ESPE) and filled with a flowable RBC (Tetric EvoFlow, Ivoclar Vivadent) to which had been added 2 wt% traceable glass beads. Two micro-CT scans were performed on each sample (uncured and cured). The scans were then subjected to medical image registration for shrinkage vector calculation. Shrinkage vectors were evaluated three-dimensionally (3D) and in the axial direction.
The "adhesive" group had the greatest mean 3D shrinkage vector lengths and upward movement (31.1 ± 10.9 μm; - 13.7 ± 12.1 μm), followed by the "diverging" (27.4 ± 12.1 μm; - 5.7 ± 17.2 μm) and "cylindrical" groups (23.3 ± 11.1 μm; - 3.7 ± 13.6 μm); all groups differed significantly (p < 0.001 for each comparison, one-way ANOVA, Tamhane's T2).
The values and direction of the shrinkage vectors as well as interfacial debonding varied according to the cavity configuration.
Cavity configuration in terms of wall orientation and beveling of enamel margin influences the shrinkage pattern of composites.
本研究旨在探讨窝洞形态对置于窝洞中的可流动树脂基复合材料(RBC)收缩矢量的影响。
将 27 个人类磨牙根据窝洞形态分为三组(n=9):“粘结型”、“发散型”和“圆柱型”。“粘结型”窝洞代表有斜面的釉质边缘和向颌面汇聚的壁,“发散型”窝洞具有向颌面发散的壁,“圆柱型”窝洞具有平行的壁(直径=6mm);所有窝洞均深 3mm。每个预备窝洞均用自酸蚀粘结剂(Adper Easy Bond,3M ESPE)处理,并填入添加了 2wt%可追踪玻璃珠的可流动 RBC(Tetric EvoFlow,Ivoclar Vivadent)。对每个样本(未固化和已固化)进行两次微 CT 扫描。然后对扫描结果进行医学图像配准以计算收缩矢量。从三维(3D)和轴向方向评估收缩矢量。
“粘结型”组的平均 3D 收缩矢量长度和向上运动最大(31.1±10.9μm;-13.7±12.1μm),其次是“发散型”(27.4±12.1μm;-5.7±17.2μm)和“圆柱型”组(23.3±11.1μm;-3.7±13.6μm);各组之间差异均有统计学意义(每两组比较均 p<0.001,单向方差分析,Tamhane's T2)。
收缩矢量的大小和方向以及界面脱粘随窝洞形态而变化。
窝洞形态(壁的方向和釉质边缘的斜面)会影响复合材料的收缩模式。