Suppr超能文献

I类可流动树脂复合材料修复体聚合收缩的微计算机断层扫描评估

Microcomputed Tomography Evaluation of Polymerization Shrinkage of Class I Flowable Resin Composite Restorations.

作者信息

Sampaio C S, Chiu K-J, Farrokhmanesh E, Janal M, Puppin-Rontani R M, Giannini M, Bonfante E A, Coelho P G, Hirata R

出版信息

Oper Dent. 2017 Jan/Feb;42(1):E16-E23. doi: 10.2341/15-296-L. Epub 2016 Sep 30.

Abstract

The present study aimed to characterize the pattern and volume of polymerization shrinkage of flowable resin composites, including one conventional, two bulk fill, and one self-adhesive. Standardized class I preparations (2.5 mm depth × 4 mm length × 4 mm wide) were performed in 24 caries-free human third molars that were randomly divided in four groups, according to the resin composite and adhesive system used: group 1 = Permaflo + Peak Universal Bond (PP); group 2 = Filtek Bulk Fill + Scotchbond Universal (FS); group 3 = Surefil SDR + XP Bond (SX); and group 4 = Vertise flow self-adhering (VE) (n=6). Each tooth was scanned three times using a microcomputed tomography (μCT) apparatus. The first scan was done after the cavity preparation, the second after cavity filling with the flowable resin composite before curing, and the third after it was cured. The μCT images were imported into three-dimensional rendering software, and volumetric polymerization shrinkage percentage was calculated for each sample. Data were submitted to one-way analysis of variance and post hoc comparisons. No significant difference was observed among PP, FS, and VE. SX bulk fill resin composite presented the lowest values of volumetric shrinkage. Shrinkage was mostly observed along the occlusal surface and part of the pulpal floor. In conclusion, polymerization shrinkage outcomes in a 2.5-mm deep class I cavity were material dependent, although most materials did not differ. The location of shrinkage was mainly at the occlusal surface.

摘要

本研究旨在表征可流动树脂复合材料的聚合收缩模式和体积,包括一种传统材料、两种大块填料材料和一种自粘材料。在24颗无龋的人类第三磨牙上制备标准化的I类洞型(深度2.5毫米×长度4毫米×宽度4毫米),根据所使用的树脂复合材料和粘结系统将其随机分为四组:第1组 = Permaflo + Peak Universal Bond(PP);第2组 = Filtek Bulk Fill + Scotchbond Universal(FS);第3组 = Surefil SDR + XP Bond(SX);第4组 = Vertise flow自粘材料(VE)(n = 6)。使用微型计算机断层扫描(μCT)设备对每颗牙齿进行三次扫描。第一次扫描在洞型制备后进行,第二次在填充可流动树脂复合材料且未固化前进行,第三次在固化后进行。将μCT图像导入三维渲染软件,计算每个样本的体积聚合收缩百分比。数据进行单因素方差分析和事后比较。在PP、FS和VE之间未观察到显著差异。SX大块填料树脂复合材料的体积收缩值最低。收缩主要沿咬合面和部分髓室底观察到。总之,在2.5毫米深的I类洞中,聚合收缩结果取决于材料,尽管大多数材料之间没有差异。收缩的位置主要在咬合面。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验