School of Psychology, Bond University, Robina, Australia.
Faculty of Health Sciences & Medicine, Bond University, Robina, Australia.
Arch Womens Ment Health. 2018 Aug;21(4):383-390. doi: 10.1007/s00737-017-0806-x. Epub 2017 Dec 16.
This study aimed to assess and develop consensus on the assessment of disordered eating in pregnancy. A three-round modified Delphi approach was used. Participants were international clinicians and researchers (N = 26) with extensive knowledge on and/or clinical experience with eating disorders, particularly in relation to pregnancy and/or women's health. Clear consensus among the panel, defined as 75% agreement, was reached regarding the assessment of disordered eating in pregnancy, in addition to potential assessment methods. Antenatal assessment of disordered eating was perceived to be crucial and ideally occur in a routine manner. Despite agreement that various assessment methods would be relevant in assessing disordered eating in pregnancy, psychometrically sound brief screening instruments were perceived to be most feasible for practitioners and women accessing antenatal care; however, these instruments must be pregnancy-specific and delivered in an authentic and caring manner to be beneficial.
本研究旨在评估并达成关于孕期饮食失调评估的共识。采用了三轮改良 Delphi 法。参与者为国际临床医生和研究人员(N=26),他们在饮食障碍方面具有丰富的知识和/或临床经验,特别是与妊娠和/或妇女健康相关的知识和/或临床经验。专家小组就孕期饮食失调的评估以及潜在的评估方法达成了明确的共识,即 75%的一致意见。专家小组认为,对孕期饮食失调进行产前评估至关重要,且理想情况下应常规进行。尽管专家小组一致认为,各种评估方法都与评估孕期饮食失调有关,但他们认为,对于接受产前护理的从业者和女性来说,具有良好心理测量特性的简短筛查工具最具可行性;然而,这些工具必须是针对妊娠的,并且必须以真实和关爱的方式呈现,才会有益。