• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血管内动脉瘤修复术后迟发性内漏与早期内漏的比较评估

Evaluation of Delayed Endoleak Compared with Early Endoleak after Endovascular Aneurysm Repair.

作者信息

Le Trong Binh, Park Keun-Myoung, Jeon Yong Sun, Hong Kee Chun, Cho Soon Gu

机构信息

Endovascular Training Center, Inha University Hospital, Inha University School of Medicine, 7-206 Sinheung-dong 3-ga, Jung-gu, Incheon, Republic of Korea.

Department of Vascular Surgery, Inha University Hospital, Inha University School of Medicine, 7-206 Sinheung-dong 3-ga, Jung-gu, Incheon, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2018 Feb;29(2):203-209. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2017.09.023. Epub 2017 Dec 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvir.2017.09.023
PMID:29249593
Abstract

PURPOSE

To identify prevalence and evaluate outcomes of delayed endoleak (DEL) compared with early endoleak (EEL) after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data of 164 patients who underwent elective EVAR at a single center were retrospectively analyzed. DEL was defined as any type of endoleak that was first detected ≥ 12 months after EVAR. Patients who had < 1 year of follow-up were excluded. Endoleak was classified into a more aggressive category if a patient had > 1 type of endoleak. Analysis included 81 patients (82.7% male). Mean age was 73.1 years ± 9.3. Median follow-up duration was 43 months (range, 12-135 months).

RESULTS

Endoleak was present in 32 patients (39.5%), including 21 EEL (25.9%) and 11 DEL (13.6%). DEL consisted of 2 type I, 5 type II, 1 type III, and 3 type V (endotension). Median time to detection was 45 months (range, 15-60 months), and median follow-up duration was 62 months (range, 37-104 months). Compared with EEL, DEL had larger aneurysm diameters and higher rates of non-type II endoleak and reintervention. Type II DEL also required more reintervention procedures than type II EEL.

CONCLUSIONS

DEL had a noteworthy incidence and occurred late after EVAR. It predominantly consisted of non-type II endoleak and appeared to have more reinterventions than EEL. Meticulous long-term imaging surveillance to identify and manage DEL is critical.

摘要

目的

确定血管腔内主动脉瘤修复术(EVAR)后延迟内漏(DEL)的发生率,并与早期内漏(EEL)的结果进行评估比较。

材料与方法

回顾性分析在单一中心接受择期EVAR的164例患者的数据。DEL定义为在EVAR后≥12个月首次检测到的任何类型的内漏。随访时间<1年的患者被排除。如果患者有>1种类型的内漏,则将内漏分类为更具侵袭性的类别。分析纳入81例患者(男性占82.7%)。平均年龄为73.1岁±9.3岁。中位随访时间为43个月(范围12 - 135个月)。

结果

32例患者(39.5%)存在内漏,包括21例EEL(25.9%)和11例DEL(13.6%)。DEL包括2例I型、5例II型、1例III型和3例V型(内张力)。检测的中位时间为45个月(范围15 - 60个月),中位随访时间为62个月(范围37 - 104个月)。与EEL相比,DEL的动脉瘤直径更大,非II型内漏和再次干预的发生率更高。II型DEL也比II型EEL需要更多的再次干预手术。

结论

DEL发生率值得关注,且发生在EVAR术后较晚时间。它主要由非II型内漏组成,似乎比EEL有更多的再次干预。细致的长期影像学监测以识别和处理DEL至关重要。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of Delayed Endoleak Compared with Early Endoleak after Endovascular Aneurysm Repair.血管内动脉瘤修复术后迟发性内漏与早期内漏的比较评估
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2018 Feb;29(2):203-209. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2017.09.023. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
2
Outcome and clinical significance of delayed endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair.血管内动脉瘤修复术后延迟性内漏的结局及临床意义。
J Vasc Surg. 2014 Apr;59(4):915-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.10.093. Epub 2013 Dec 19.
3
Defining a role for contrast-enhanced ultrasound in endovascular aneurysm repair surveillance.定义对比增强超声在血管内动脉瘤修复监测中的作用。
J Vasc Surg. 2013 Jul;58(1):18-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.12.057. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
4
Reintervention Rate after Open Surgery and Endovascular Repair for Nonruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.非破裂性腹主动脉瘤开放手术和血管腔内修复后的再次干预率。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2017 Aug;43:134-143. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2017.03.168. Epub 2017 May 3.
5
Evaluating outcomes of endoleak discrepancies between computed tomography scan and ultrasound imaging after endovascular abdominal aneurysm repair.评估血管内腹主动脉瘤修复术后计算机断层扫描与超声成像之间内漏差异的结果。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2011 Jan;25(1):94-100. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2010.08.003.
6
Length of abdominal aortic aneurysm and incidence of endoleaks type II after endovascular repair.腹主动脉瘤长度与血管腔内修复术后Ⅱ型内漏发生率
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2015 Nov;127(21-22):851-857. doi: 10.1007/s00508-015-0871-y. Epub 2015 Nov 5.
7
The Impact of Aortic Tortuosity on Delayed Type I or III Endoleak after Endovascular Aortic Repair.主动脉迂曲对血管腔内主动脉修复术后迟发型Ⅰ型或Ⅲ型内漏的影响。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2017 May;41:110-117. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2016.09.020. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
8
Type II endoleak is an enigmatic and unpredictable marker of worse outcome after endovascular aneurysm repair.II型内漏是血管内动脉瘤修复术后预后较差的一个神秘且不可预测的指标。
J Vasc Surg. 2014 Apr;59(4):930-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.10.092. Epub 2013 Dec 22.
9
The incidence and fate of endoleaks vary between ruptured and elective endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.内漏的发生率和转归在破裂性和择期性血管腔内腹主动脉瘤修复之间有所不同。
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Jun;65(6):1617-1624. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.10.092. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
10
Embo-EVAR: A Technique to Prevent Type II Endoleak? A Single-Center Experience.腔内栓塞辅助腹主动脉瘤腔内修复术:预防Ⅱ型内漏的一种技术?单中心经验
Ann Vasc Surg. 2017 Oct;44:119-127. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2017.01.028. Epub 2017 May 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Status of diagnosis and therapy of abdominal aortic aneurysms.腹主动脉瘤的诊断与治疗现状
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Jul 28;10:1199804. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1199804. eCollection 2023.
2
The impact of completion and follow-up endoleaks on survival, reintervention, and rupture.通畅程度和随访时内漏对生存、再次干预和破裂的影响。
J Vasc Surg. 2023 Jun;77(6):1676-1684. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.02.009. Epub 2023 Feb 24.
3
[Endovascular aortic repair of endoleaks : Diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes].[内漏的血管腔内主动脉修复术:诊断、治疗及结果]
Radiologie (Heidelb). 2022 Jul;62(7):592-600. doi: 10.1007/s00117-022-01033-3. Epub 2022 Jun 23.
4
Long-term Outcomes Associated With Open vs Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair in a Medicare-Matched Database.在 Medicare 匹配数据库中,与开放手术和血管内修复腹主动脉瘤相关的长期结果。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 May 2;5(5):e2212081. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.12081.