Barca Laura, Mazzuca Claudia, Borghi Anna M
Institute of Cognitive Science and Technologies, Italian National Research Council (CNR), Rome, Italy.
Department of Philosophy and Communication, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Front Psychol. 2017 Dec 1;8:2014. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02014. eCollection 2017.
This study explores the impact of the extensive use of an oral device since infancy (pacifier) on the acquisition of concrete, abstract, and emotional concepts. While recent evidence showed a negative relation between pacifier use and children's emotional competence (Niedenthal et al., 2012), the possible interaction between use of pacifier and processing of emotional and abstract language has not been investigated. According to recent theories, while all concepts are grounded in sensorimotor experience, abstract concepts activate linguistic and social information more than concrete ones. Specifically, the Words As Social Tools (WAT) proposal predicts that the simulation of their meaning leads to an activation of the mouth (Borghi and Binkofski, 2014; Borghi and Zarcone, 2016). Since the pacifier affects facial mimicry forcing mouth muscles into a static position, we hypothesize its possible interference on acquisition/consolidation of abstract emotional and abstract not-emotional concepts, which are mainly conveyed during social and linguistic interactions, than of concrete concepts. Fifty-nine first grade children, with a history of different frequency of pacifier use, provided oral definitions of the meaning of abstract not-emotional, abstract emotional, and concrete words. Main effect of concept type emerged, with higher accuracy in defining concrete and abstract emotional concepts with respect to abstract not-emotional concepts, independently from pacifier use. Accuracy in definitions was not influenced by the use of pacifier, but correspondence and hierarchical clustering analyses suggest that the use of pacifier differently modulates the conceptual relations elicited by abstract emotional and abstract not-emotional. While the majority of the children produced a similar pattern of conceptual relations, analyses on the few (6) children who overused the pacifier (for more than 3 years) showed that they tend to distinguish less clearly between concrete and abstract emotional concepts and between concrete and abstract not-emotional concepts than children who did not use it (5) or used it for short (17). As to the conceptual relations they produced, children who overused the pacifier tended to refer less to their experience and to social and emotional situations, use more exemplifications and functional relations, and less free associations.
本研究探讨了婴儿期开始大量使用口腔器具(安抚奶嘴)对具体概念、抽象概念和情感概念习得的影响。虽然最近的证据表明安抚奶嘴的使用与儿童的情感能力之间存在负相关(尼登塔尔等人,2012年),但安抚奶嘴的使用与情感和抽象语言处理之间可能存在的相互作用尚未得到研究。根据最近的理论,虽然所有概念都基于感觉运动经验,但抽象概念比具体概念更能激活语言和社会信息。具体而言,“词语即社会工具”(WAT)假说预测,对其意义的模拟会导致口腔的激活(博尔吉和宾科夫斯基,2014年;博尔吉和扎尔科内,2016年)。由于安抚奶嘴会影响面部模仿,使口腔肌肉处于静态位置,我们假设它可能会干扰抽象情感概念和抽象非情感概念的习得/巩固,这些概念主要在社会和语言互动中传达,而对具体概念的干扰较小。59名一年级儿童,有不同频率使用安抚奶嘴的经历,他们对抽象非情感、抽象情感和具体词语的意义进行了口头定义。出现了概念类型的主效应,与抽象非情感概念相比,在定义具体和抽象情感概念时准确性更高,且与安抚奶嘴的使用无关。定义的准确性不受安抚奶嘴使用的影响,但对应分析和层次聚类分析表明,安抚奶嘴的使用对抽象情感和抽象非情感所引发的概念关系有不同的调节作用。虽然大多数儿童产生了相似的概念关系模式,但对少数(6名)过度使用安抚奶嘴(超过3年)的儿童的分析表明,与未使用安抚奶嘴的儿童(5名)或短期使用安抚奶嘴的儿童(17名)相比,他们在区分具体和抽象情感概念以及具体和抽象非情感概念方面往往不那么清晰。至于他们产生的概念关系,过度使用安抚奶嘴的儿童倾向于较少提及自己的经历以及社会和情感情境,更多地使用例证和功能关系,而较少使用自由联想。