Feng Zhongxiang, Yang Miaomiao, Ma Changxi, Jiang Kang, Lei Yewei, Huang Wenjuan, Huang Zhipeng, Zhan Jingjing, Zhou Muxiong
School of Automobile and Traffic Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei, Anhui, PR China.
School of Traffic and Transportation, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou, Gansu, PR China.
PLoS One. 2017 Dec 18;12(12):e0189793. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189793. eCollection 2017.
The present study examined the types of situations that caused Chinese professional and non-professional drivers to become angry and investigated the differences in driving-elicited anger, considering the influences of type A behavior pattern and trait anger between the two groups. The 20-item revised Driving Anger Scale (DAS) was used to assess a sample of 232 drivers (57% professional, 43% non-professional). The non-professional drivers reported significantly higher levels of anger than the professional drivers on the overall Driving Anger Scale (DAS) and the traffic obstructions and discourtesy subscales. In both groups, the preferred driving speeds were positively related to driving anger. Furthermore, drivers with a type A personality exhibited higher overall driving anger scores and higher anger scores in response to traffic obstructions and slow driving than drivers with a type B personality. Trait anger was significantly related to driving anger in both groups. In the non-professional group, type A behavior patterns (TABPs) and time hurry (TH) were positively correlated with anger evoked by slow driving. In the professional group, TABPs, TH and competitive hostility (CH) were positively related to driving anger, and the TABPs exerted an indirect effect on driving anger by mediating the influence of trait anger. Overall, these findings provide a theoretical basis for implementing targeted interventions for driving anger in both professional and non-professional drivers.
本研究调查了导致中国职业司机和非职业司机发怒的情境类型,并考虑了两组之间A型行为模式和特质愤怒的影响,对驾驶引发的愤怒差异进行了调查。使用20项修订版驾驶愤怒量表(DAS)对232名司机(57%为职业司机,43%为非职业司机)进行了评估。在总体驾驶愤怒量表(DAS)以及交通阻塞和无礼分量表上,非职业司机报告的愤怒水平显著高于职业司机。在两组中,偏好的驾驶速度与驾驶愤怒呈正相关。此外,与B型人格的司机相比,A型人格的司机在总体驾驶愤怒得分以及对交通阻塞和慢速驾驶的愤怒得分更高。特质愤怒在两组中均与驾驶愤怒显著相关。在非职业组中,A型行为模式(TABP)和时间紧迫感(TH)与慢速驾驶引发的愤怒呈正相关。在职业组中,TABP、TH和竞争性敌意(CH)与驾驶愤怒呈正相关,且TABP通过介导特质愤怒的影响对驾驶愤怒产生间接效应。总体而言,这些发现为针对职业和非职业司机的驾驶愤怒实施有针对性的干预措施提供了理论依据。