Suppr超能文献

驾驶愤怒及其与A型行为模式和特质愤怒的关系:职业驾驶员与非职业驾驶员的差异

Driving anger and its relationships with type A behavior patterns and trait anger: Differences between professional and non-professional drivers.

作者信息

Feng Zhongxiang, Yang Miaomiao, Ma Changxi, Jiang Kang, Lei Yewei, Huang Wenjuan, Huang Zhipeng, Zhan Jingjing, Zhou Muxiong

机构信息

School of Automobile and Traffic Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei, Anhui, PR China.

School of Traffic and Transportation, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou, Gansu, PR China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2017 Dec 18;12(12):e0189793. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189793. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

The present study examined the types of situations that caused Chinese professional and non-professional drivers to become angry and investigated the differences in driving-elicited anger, considering the influences of type A behavior pattern and trait anger between the two groups. The 20-item revised Driving Anger Scale (DAS) was used to assess a sample of 232 drivers (57% professional, 43% non-professional). The non-professional drivers reported significantly higher levels of anger than the professional drivers on the overall Driving Anger Scale (DAS) and the traffic obstructions and discourtesy subscales. In both groups, the preferred driving speeds were positively related to driving anger. Furthermore, drivers with a type A personality exhibited higher overall driving anger scores and higher anger scores in response to traffic obstructions and slow driving than drivers with a type B personality. Trait anger was significantly related to driving anger in both groups. In the non-professional group, type A behavior patterns (TABPs) and time hurry (TH) were positively correlated with anger evoked by slow driving. In the professional group, TABPs, TH and competitive hostility (CH) were positively related to driving anger, and the TABPs exerted an indirect effect on driving anger by mediating the influence of trait anger. Overall, these findings provide a theoretical basis for implementing targeted interventions for driving anger in both professional and non-professional drivers.

摘要

本研究调查了导致中国职业司机和非职业司机发怒的情境类型,并考虑了两组之间A型行为模式和特质愤怒的影响,对驾驶引发的愤怒差异进行了调查。使用20项修订版驾驶愤怒量表(DAS)对232名司机(57%为职业司机,43%为非职业司机)进行了评估。在总体驾驶愤怒量表(DAS)以及交通阻塞和无礼分量表上,非职业司机报告的愤怒水平显著高于职业司机。在两组中,偏好的驾驶速度与驾驶愤怒呈正相关。此外,与B型人格的司机相比,A型人格的司机在总体驾驶愤怒得分以及对交通阻塞和慢速驾驶的愤怒得分更高。特质愤怒在两组中均与驾驶愤怒显著相关。在非职业组中,A型行为模式(TABP)和时间紧迫感(TH)与慢速驾驶引发的愤怒呈正相关。在职业组中,TABP、TH和竞争性敌意(CH)与驾驶愤怒呈正相关,且TABP通过介导特质愤怒的影响对驾驶愤怒产生间接效应。总体而言,这些发现为针对职业和非职业司机的驾驶愤怒实施有针对性的干预措施提供了理论依据。

相似文献

2
Driving anger in Malaysia.
Accid Anal Prev. 2014 Oct;71:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.04.019. Epub 2014 May 24.
4
Driving anger dimensions and their relationship with aberrant driver behavior in Lebanon: Results from a national self-reported survey.
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 17;18(3):e0283293. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283293. eCollection 2023.
6
Driving anger among motor vehicle drivers in China: A cross-sectional survey.
Traffic Inj Prev. 2019;20(6):570-574. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2019.1623396. Epub 2019 Jun 21.
7
The effect of stress and personality on dangerous driving behavior among Chinese drivers.
Accid Anal Prev. 2014 Dec;73:34-40. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.07.024. Epub 2014 Aug 27.
8
Expressing Anger Is More Dangerous than Feeling Angry when Driving.
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 3;11(6):e0156948. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156948. eCollection 2016.
9
Forgivingness, anger, and hostility in aggressive driving.
Accid Anal Prev. 2014 Jan;62:303-8. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.10.017. Epub 2013 Oct 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Anger while driving in Mexico City.
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 30;14(9):e0223048. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223048. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
Exploring the influential factors in incident clearance time: Disentangling causation from self-selection bias.
Accid Anal Prev. 2015 Dec;85:58-65. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.08.024. Epub 2015 Sep 12.
3
Driving anger in Malaysia.
Accid Anal Prev. 2014 Oct;71:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.04.019. Epub 2014 May 24.
4
Usage and perceived effectiveness of fatigue countermeasures for professional and nonprofessional drivers.
Accid Anal Prev. 2011 May;43(3):797-803. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.10.027. Epub 2010 Dec 15.
5
Development and validation of a self-report measure of bus driver behaviour.
Ergonomics. 2010 Dec;53(12):1420-33. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2010.532882.
6
Work stress and driving anger in Japan.
Accid Anal Prev. 2010 Jan;42(1):174-81. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2009.07.016. Epub 2009 Aug 11.
7
Driving Anger Scale, French adaptation: further evidence of reliability and validity.
Percept Mot Skills. 2007 Jun;104(3 Pt 1):947-57. doi: 10.2466/pms.104.3.947-957.
8
Reliability and validity of aggressive driving measures in China.
Traffic Inj Prev. 2004 Dec;5(4):349-55. doi: 10.1080/15389580490509527.
10
Anger, aggression, and risky behavior: a comparison of high and low anger drivers.
Behav Res Ther. 2003 Jun;41(6):701-18. doi: 10.1016/s0005-7967(02)00046-3.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验