Department of Orthopaedics, Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Department of Orthopaedics, Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Apr;99(4):726-735. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.11.006. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
To investigate the accuracy of 3 commonly used neurodynamic tests (slump test, straight-leg raise [SLR] test, femoral neurodynamic test) and 2 clinical assessments to determine radiculopathy (radiculopathy I, 1 neurologic sign; radiculopathy II, 2 neurologic signs corresponding to 1 specific nerve root) in detecting magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings (extrusion, subarticular nerve root compression, and foraminal nerve root compression).
Validity study.
Secondary care.
We included subjects (N=99; mean age, 58y; 54% women) referred for epidural steroid injection because of lumbar radicular symptoms who had positive clinical and MRI findings. Positive clinical findings included the slump test (n=67), SLR test (n=50), femoral neurodynamic test (n=7), radiculopathy I (n=70), and radiculopathy II (n=33). Positive MRI findings included extrusion (n=27), subarticular nerve compression (n=14), and foraminal nerve compression (n=25).
Not applicable.
Accuracy of clinical tests in detecting MRI findings was evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, and receiver operating characteristics analysis with area under the curve (AUC).
The slump test had the highest sensitivity in detecting extrusion (.78) and subarticular nerve compression (1.00), but the respective specificity was low (.36 and .38). Radiculopathy I was most sensitive in detecting foraminal nerve compression (.80) but with low specificity (.34). Only 1 assessment had a concurrent high sensitivity and specificity (ie, radiculopathy II) in detecting subarticular nerve compression (.71 and .73, respectively). The AUC for all tests in detecting extrusion, subarticular nerve compression, and foraminal nerve compression showed ranges of .48 to .60, .63 to .82, and .33 to .57, respectively.
In general, the investigated neurodynamic tests or assessments for radiculopathy lacked diagnostic accuracy. The slump test was the most sensitive test, while radiculopathy II was the most specific test. Most interestingly, no relationship was found between any neurodynamic test and foraminal nerve compression (foraminal stenosis) as visualized on MRI.
研究 3 种常用神经动力测试( slumped 测试、直腿抬高测试、股神经动力测试)和 2 种临床评估方法在检测磁共振成像(MRI)结果(突出、关节突神经根受压和神经孔神经根受压)中确定神经根病(神经根病 I,1 个神经体征;神经根病 II,对应 1 个特定神经根的 2 个神经体征)的准确性。
有效性研究。
二级保健。
我们纳入了因腰椎根性症状而接受硬膜外类固醇注射治疗的患者(N=99;平均年龄 58 岁;54%为女性),这些患者的临床和 MRI 检查均为阳性。阳性临床发现包括 slumped 测试(n=67)、直腿抬高测试(n=50)、股神经动力测试(n=7)、神经根病 I(n=70)和神经根病 II(n=33)。阳性 MRI 发现包括突出(n=27)、关节突神经根受压(n=14)和神经孔神经根受压(n=25)。
不适用。
采用灵敏度、特异性和接收者操作特征分析评估曲线下面积(AUC)评估临床检查对 MRI 发现的准确性。
slumped 测试在检测突出(.78)和关节突神经根受压(1.00)方面的敏感性最高,但特异性较低(.36 和.38)。神经根病 I 在检测神经孔神经根受压方面的敏感性最高(.80),但特异性较低(.34)。只有 1 种评估方法在检测关节突神经根受压时具有较高的敏感性和特异性(即神经根病 II)(分别为.71 和.73)。所有测试在检测突出、关节突神经根受压和神经孔神经根受压方面的 AUC 范围分别为.48 至.60、.63 至.82 和.33 至.57。
一般来说,研究中涉及的神经动力测试或神经根病评估方法缺乏诊断准确性。 slumped 测试的敏感性最高,而神经根病 II 的特异性最高。最有趣的是,没有发现任何神经动力测试与 MRI 上观察到的神经孔神经根受压(神经孔狭窄)之间存在关系。