• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多通道施源器用于阴道高剂量率近距离治疗的不同治疗计划优化方法比较:降低阴道黏膜高剂量是可行的。

Comparison of different treatment planning optimization methods for vaginal HDR brachytherapy with multichannel applicators: A reduction of the high doses to the vaginal mucosa is possible.

作者信息

Carrara Mauro, Cusumano Davide, Giandini Tommaso, Tenconi Chiara, Mazzarella Ester, Grisotto Simone, Massari Eleonora, Mazzeo Davide, Cerrotta Annamaria, Pappalardi Brigida, Fallai Carlo, Pignoli Emanuele

机构信息

Medical Physics Unit, IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, via Venezian 1, 20133 Milan, Italy.

Unità Operativa Complessa di Fisica Sanitaria, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Roma, Italy.

出版信息

Phys Med. 2017 Dec;44:58-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.11.007. Epub 2017 Nov 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.11.007
PMID:29254592
Abstract

PURPOSE

A direct planning approach with multi-channel vaginal cylinders (MVCs) used for HDR brachytherapy of vaginal cancers is particularly challenging. Purpose of this study was to compare the dosimetric performances of different forward and inverse methods used for the optimization of MVC-based vaginal treatments for endometrial cancer, with a particular attention to the definition of strategies useful to limit the high doses to the vaginal mucosa.

METHODS

Twelve postoperative vaginal HDR brachytherapy treatments performed with MVCs were considered. Plans were retrospectively optimized with three different methods: Dose Point Optimization followed by Graphical Optimization (DPO + GrO), Inverse Planning Simulated Annealing with two different class solutions as starting conditions (surflPSA and homogIPSA) and Hybrid Inverse Planning Optimization (HIPO). Several dosimetric parameters related to target coverage, hot spot extensions and sparing of organs at risk were analyzed to evaluate the quality of the achieved treatment plans. Dose homogeneity index (DHI), conformal index (COIN) and a further parameter quantifying the proportion of the central catheter loading with respect to the overall loading (i.e., the central catheter loading index: CCLI) were also quantified.

RESULTS

The achieved PTV coverage parameters were highly correlated with each other but uncorrelated with the hot spot quantifiers. HomogIPSA and HIPO achieved higher DHIs and CCLIs and lower volumes of high doses than DPO + GrO and surflPSA.

CONCLUSIONS

Within the investigated optimization methods, HIPO and homoglPSA showed the highest dose homogeneity to the target. In particular, homogIPSA resulted also the most effective in reducing hot spots to the vaginal mucosa.

摘要

目的

采用多通道阴道施源器(MVC)进行阴道癌高剂量率近距离放疗的直接计划方法极具挑战性。本研究的目的是比较用于子宫内膜癌基于MVC的阴道治疗优化的不同正向和逆向方法的剂量学性能,特别关注限制阴道黏膜高剂量的策略定义。

方法

考虑了12例使用MVC进行的术后阴道高剂量率近距离放疗治疗。计划采用三种不同方法进行回顾性优化:剂量点优化后进行图形优化(DPO + GrO)、以两种不同类解决方案作为起始条件的逆向计划模拟退火(surflPSA和homogIPSA)以及混合逆向计划优化(HIPO)。分析了与靶区覆盖、热点扩展和危及器官 sparing相关的几个剂量学参数,以评估所实现治疗计划的质量。还对剂量均匀性指数(DHI)、适形指数(COIN)以及量化中央导管负载相对于总负载的比例的另一个参数(即中央导管负载指数:CCLI)进行了量化。

结果

所实现的靶区体积(PTV)覆盖参数彼此高度相关,但与热点量化指标无关。与DPO + GrO和surflPSA相比,HomogIPSA和HIPO实现了更高的DHI和CCLI以及更低的高剂量体积。

结论

在所研究的优化方法中,HIPO和homoglPSA对靶区显示出最高的剂量均匀性。特别是,homogIPSA在减少阴道黏膜热点方面也最有效。

相似文献

1
Comparison of different treatment planning optimization methods for vaginal HDR brachytherapy with multichannel applicators: A reduction of the high doses to the vaginal mucosa is possible.多通道施源器用于阴道高剂量率近距离治疗的不同治疗计划优化方法比较:降低阴道黏膜高剂量是可行的。
Phys Med. 2017 Dec;44:58-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.11.007. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
2
Dosimetric comparison of optimization methods for multichannel intracavitary brachytherapy for superficial vaginal tumors.浅表阴道肿瘤多通道腔内近距离放射治疗优化方法的剂量学比较
Brachytherapy. 2013 Nov-Dec;12(6):637-44. doi: 10.1016/j.brachy.2013.04.009. Epub 2013 Jul 11.
3
Dosimetric and Radiobiological Evaluation of Hybrid Inverse Planning and Optimization for Cervical Cancer Brachytherapy.宫颈癌近距离放疗混合逆向计划与优化的剂量学和放射生物学评估
Anticancer Res. 2015 Nov;35(11):6091-6.
4
Investigating the role of constrained CVT and CVT in HIPO inverse planning for HDR brachytherapy of prostate cancer.研究受限连续变量调强(constrained continuous variable technique,constrained CVT)和调强适形(conformal volume therapy,CVT)在前列腺癌 HDR 近距离治疗 HIPO 逆向计划中的作用。
Med Phys. 2019 Jul;46(7):2955-2968. doi: 10.1002/mp.13564. Epub 2019 Jun 5.
5
Design and Development of In-House Multichannel Applicator for HDR Vaginal Brachytherapy and Dosimetric Comparision with Single Channel Applicator.用于高剂量率阴道近距离放射治疗的内部多通道施源器的设计与开发以及与单通道施源器的剂量学比较
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2019 Dec 1;20(12):3805-3810. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.12.3805.
6
Comparison of the IPSA and HIPO algorithms for interstitial tongue high-dose-rate brachytherapy.比较 IPSA 和 HIPO 算法在间质舌部高剂量率近距离放射治疗中的应用。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 4;13(10):e0205229. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205229. eCollection 2018.
7
Comparison of two inverse planning algorithms for cervical cancer brachytherapy.两种宫颈癌近距离治疗逆向计划算法的比较。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2021 Mar;22(3):157-165. doi: 10.1002/acm2.13195. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
8
A comparison of inverse optimization algorithms for HDR/PDR prostate brachytherapy treatment planning.高剂量率/后装近距离放射治疗前列腺癌治疗计划的逆优化算法比较
Brachytherapy. 2015 Mar-Apr;14(2):279-88. doi: 10.1016/j.brachy.2014.09.006. Epub 2014 Oct 22.
9
A comparison of anatomy-based inverse planning with simulated annealing and graphical optimization for high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy.基于解剖结构的逆向计划与模拟退火和图形优化在高剂量率前列腺近距离治疗中的比较。
Brachytherapy. 2008 Jan-Mar;7(1):12-6. doi: 10.1016/j.brachy.2007.10.001. Epub 2007 Nov 26.
10
Dosimetric comparison of volume-based and inverse planning simulated annealing-based dose optimizations for high-dose rate brachytherapy.高剂量率近距离放射治疗中基于体积的剂量优化与基于逆向计划模拟退火的剂量优化的剂量学比较
Med Dosim. 2015 Autumn;40(3):235-9. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2015.01.003. Epub 2015 Mar 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Dosimetric evaluation of different cylinder diameters in three-dimensional vaginal brachytherapy for early-stage endometrial cancer.不同直径施源器在早期子宫内膜癌三维阴道近距离放疗中的剂量学评估。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2024 Nov 25;150(12):510. doi: 10.1007/s00432-024-05994-x.
2
[Dosimetric analysis of different optimization algorithms for three-dimensional brachytherapy for gynecologic tumors].[妇科肿瘤三维近距离放疗不同优化算法的剂量学分析]
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2024 Apr 20;44(4):773-779. doi: 10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2024.04.20.
3
Assessment of dose to vaginal mucosa for gynecologic template interstitial high-dose-rate brachytherapy using Monte Carlo simulation.
使用蒙特卡罗模拟评估妇科模板组织间高剂量率近距离放射治疗中阴道黏膜的剂量
J Contemp Brachytherapy. 2023 Oct;15(5):317-324. doi: 10.5114/jcb.2023.131781. Epub 2023 Oct 3.
4
Dose Optimization for Single-Channel Vaginal Cylinder High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy: A Double Prescription Method for Patients With Endometrial Adenocarcinoma.单通道阴道柱状体高剂量率近距离放射治疗的剂量优化:子宫内膜腺癌患者的双处方方法
Cureus. 2022 Jun 24;14(6):e26303. doi: 10.7759/cureus.26303. eCollection 2022 Jun.
5
Incorporating Treatment Time into Butterfly Optimization to Reduce Total Treatment Time for Vaginal Cylinder Brachytherapy.将治疗时间纳入蝴蝶优化算法以减少阴道柱状近距离放射治疗的总治疗时间
Cureus. 2022 Apr 6;14(4):e23893. doi: 10.7759/cureus.23893. eCollection 2022 Apr.
6
Comparison of two inverse planning algorithms for cervical cancer brachytherapy.两种宫颈癌近距离治疗逆向计划算法的比较。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2021 Mar;22(3):157-165. doi: 10.1002/acm2.13195. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
7
Dosimetric comparison of manual forward planning with uniform dwell times versus volume-based inverse planning in interstitial brachytherapy of cervical malignancies.宫颈癌间质近距离治疗中手动正向计划(均匀驻留时间)与基于体积的逆向计划的剂量学比较
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2020 Nov-Dec;25(6):851-855. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2020.08.005. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
8
Does inverse planning improve plan quality in interstitial high-dose-rate breast brachytherapy?逆向计划是否能提高乳腺组织间高剂量率近距离放射治疗的计划质量?
J Contemp Brachytherapy. 2020 Apr;12(2):166-174. doi: 10.5114/jcb.2020.94584. Epub 2020 Apr 30.