Suppr超能文献

关节镜修复肩前不稳定后 Rowe 和 Western Ontario 肩不稳定指数评分的最小临床重要差异。

Minimal clinically important differences in Rowe and Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index scores after arthroscopic repair of anterior shoulder instability.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Ewha Womans University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Ewha Womans University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Apr;27(4):579-584. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.10.032. Epub 2017 Dec 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) is the threshold value for a change that would be considered meaningful by the patient. The purpose of this study was to determine the MCIDs for the Rowe score and the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) score after arthroscopic repair of anterior shoulder instability.

METHODS

The study enrolled 198 patients who underwent an arthroscopic stabilization procedure for anterior shoulder instability. Patients were assigned to no change and minimal change groups by a 15-item questionnaire at the 1-year postoperative visit. The Rowe and WOSI scores were assessed preoperatively and at a 1-year postoperative follow-up. The MCID was calculated using an anchor-based method and a distribution-based method.

RESULTS

There were 9 patients in the no change group and 26 patients in the minimal change group. The MCID for the Rowe score was 9.7 according to the anchor-based method. By the anchor-based method, the authors could not calculate MCID for the WOSI score because of insignificant difference of the mean score changes between the no change and minimal change groups. By the distribution-based method, MCIDs for the Rowe and the WOSI scores were 5.6 and 151.9 with the standard deviation-based estimate and 2.2 and 60.7 with the effect size-based estimate, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

To assess the effectiveness of an arthroscopic stabilization procedure for anterior shoulder instability using the Rowe score, a difference of at least 9.7 in the score is clinically relevant. To compare clinical outcomes between different modalities, we should consider not only statistically significant differences but also the MCID.

摘要

背景

最小临床重要差异(MCID)是患者认为有意义的变化阈值。本研究旨在确定关节镜修复肩前不稳定后罗氏评分和西部安大略肩不稳定指数(WOSI)评分的 MCID。

方法

本研究纳入了 198 例接受关节镜稳定术治疗肩前不稳定的患者。患者在术后 1 年的随访中通过 15 项问卷调查被分为无变化组和最小变化组。术前和术后 1 年评估罗氏评分和 WOSI 评分。使用锚定法和分布法计算 MCID。

结果

无变化组有 9 例,最小变化组有 26 例。根据锚定法,罗氏评分的 MCID 为 9.7。由于无变化组和最小变化组之间的平均评分变化无显著差异,因此根据锚定法无法计算 WOSI 评分的 MCID。根据分布法,罗氏评分和 WOSI 评分的 MCID 分别为 5.6 和 151.9(基于标准差的估计)和 2.2 和 60.7(基于效应量的估计)。

结论

为了使用罗氏评分评估关节镜治疗肩前不稳定的疗效,评分至少应相差 9.7 分才有临床意义。为了比较不同治疗方式的临床结果,我们不仅应考虑统计学上的显著差异,还应考虑 MCID。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验