• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关节镜修复肩前不稳定后 Rowe 和 Western Ontario 肩不稳定指数评分的最小临床重要差异。

Minimal clinically important differences in Rowe and Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index scores after arthroscopic repair of anterior shoulder instability.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Ewha Womans University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Ewha Womans University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Apr;27(4):579-584. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.10.032. Epub 2017 Dec 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.jse.2017.10.032
PMID:29254599
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) is the threshold value for a change that would be considered meaningful by the patient. The purpose of this study was to determine the MCIDs for the Rowe score and the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) score after arthroscopic repair of anterior shoulder instability.

METHODS

The study enrolled 198 patients who underwent an arthroscopic stabilization procedure for anterior shoulder instability. Patients were assigned to no change and minimal change groups by a 15-item questionnaire at the 1-year postoperative visit. The Rowe and WOSI scores were assessed preoperatively and at a 1-year postoperative follow-up. The MCID was calculated using an anchor-based method and a distribution-based method.

RESULTS

There were 9 patients in the no change group and 26 patients in the minimal change group. The MCID for the Rowe score was 9.7 according to the anchor-based method. By the anchor-based method, the authors could not calculate MCID for the WOSI score because of insignificant difference of the mean score changes between the no change and minimal change groups. By the distribution-based method, MCIDs for the Rowe and the WOSI scores were 5.6 and 151.9 with the standard deviation-based estimate and 2.2 and 60.7 with the effect size-based estimate, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

To assess the effectiveness of an arthroscopic stabilization procedure for anterior shoulder instability using the Rowe score, a difference of at least 9.7 in the score is clinically relevant. To compare clinical outcomes between different modalities, we should consider not only statistically significant differences but also the MCID.

摘要

背景

最小临床重要差异(MCID)是患者认为有意义的变化阈值。本研究旨在确定关节镜修复肩前不稳定后罗氏评分和西部安大略肩不稳定指数(WOSI)评分的 MCID。

方法

本研究纳入了 198 例接受关节镜稳定术治疗肩前不稳定的患者。患者在术后 1 年的随访中通过 15 项问卷调查被分为无变化组和最小变化组。术前和术后 1 年评估罗氏评分和 WOSI 评分。使用锚定法和分布法计算 MCID。

结果

无变化组有 9 例,最小变化组有 26 例。根据锚定法,罗氏评分的 MCID 为 9.7。由于无变化组和最小变化组之间的平均评分变化无显著差异,因此根据锚定法无法计算 WOSI 评分的 MCID。根据分布法,罗氏评分和 WOSI 评分的 MCID 分别为 5.6 和 151.9(基于标准差的估计)和 2.2 和 60.7(基于效应量的估计)。

结论

为了使用罗氏评分评估关节镜治疗肩前不稳定的疗效,评分至少应相差 9.7 分才有临床意义。为了比较不同治疗方式的临床结果,我们不仅应考虑统计学上的显著差异,还应考虑 MCID。

相似文献

1
Minimal clinically important differences in Rowe and Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index scores after arthroscopic repair of anterior shoulder instability.关节镜修复肩前不稳定后 Rowe 和 Western Ontario 肩不稳定指数评分的最小临床重要差异。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Apr;27(4):579-584. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.10.032. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
2
Minimal Clinically Important Differences and Correlating Factors for the Rowe Score and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score After Arthroscopic Stabilization Surgery for Anterior Shoulder Instability.关节镜下稳定术治疗复发性肩关节前脱位后 Rowe 评分和美国肩肘外科医生评分的最小临床重要差异及其相关因素。
Arthroscopy. 2019 Jan;35(1):54-59. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.08.005.
3
Preoperative patient-reported outcome measures predict minimal clinically important difference and patient-acceptable symptomatic state following arthroscopic Bankart repair.术前患者报告结局测量可预测关节镜下 Bankart 修复术后的最小临床重要差异和患者可接受的症状状态。
Bone Joint J. 2024 Oct 1;106-B(10):1118-1124. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.106B10.BJJ-2024-0395.R1.
4
Effect of Patient Characteristics on the Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State Thresholds After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair.关节镜下 Bankart 修复术后患者特征对最小临床重要差异和患者可接受症状状态阈值的影响。
Am J Sports Med. 2024 Jan;52(1):174-180. doi: 10.1177/03635465231212652.
5
Redefining "Critical" Bone Loss in Shoulder Instability: Functional Outcomes Worsen With "Subcritical" Bone Loss.重新定义肩关节不稳中的“临界”骨质流失:“亚临界”骨质流失会使功能预后恶化。
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Jul;43(7):1719-25. doi: 10.1177/0363546515578250. Epub 2015 Apr 16.
6
Traumatic shoulder instability involving anterior, inferior, and posterior labral injury: a prospective clinical evaluation of arthroscopic repair of 270° labral tears.累及前、下和后盂唇损伤的创伤性肩关节不稳定:关节镜下修复 270°盂唇撕裂的前瞻性临床评估。
Am J Sports Med. 2011 Aug;39(8):1687-96. doi: 10.1177/0363546511405449. Epub 2011 May 12.
7
Glenoid Track Instability Management Score: Radiographic Modification of the Instability Severity Index Score.肩盂轨迹不稳管理评分:不稳定性严重程度指数评分的影像学修正。
Arthroscopy. 2020 Jan;36(1):56-67. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.07.020.
8
A randomized clinical trial comparing open and arthroscopic stabilization for recurrent traumatic anterior shoulder instability: two-year follow-up with disease-specific quality-of-life outcomes.一项比较开放性和关节镜下稳定治疗复发性创伤性前肩不稳定的随机临床试验:两年的疾病特异性生活质量结果随访。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Mar 5;96(5):353-60. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.01656.
9
The arthroscopic latarjet procedure for anterior shoulder instability: 5-year minimum follow-up.关节镜下Latarjet手术治疗肩关节前向不稳:至少5年随访
Am J Sports Med. 2014 Nov;42(11):2560-6. doi: 10.1177/0363546514544682. Epub 2014 Aug 12.
10
Anterior shoulder instability arthroscopic treatment outcomes measures: the WOSI correlates with the Walch-Duplay score.前肩不稳关节镜治疗结果的评估:WOSI 与 Walch-Duplay 评分相关。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2012 Feb;98(1):48-53. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2011.09.013. Epub 2011 Dec 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Excellent functional outcomes in patients aged 40 years or older undergoing isolated rotator cuff repair for rotator cuff tears after primary traumatic anteroinferior shoulder dislocation.对于初次创伤性前下肩关节脱位后因肩袖撕裂接受单纯肩袖修复的40岁及以上患者,可获得优异的功能结果。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2025 Apr 9;145(1):233. doi: 10.1007/s00402-025-05785-0.
2
Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Versus Arthroscopic Latarjet for Anterior Shoulder Instability: A Matched-Pair Long-Term Follow-up Study.关节镜下Bankart修复术与关节镜下Latarjet手术治疗肩关节前向不稳的配对长期随访研究
Orthop J Sports Med. 2025 Mar 14;13(3):23259671241313474. doi: 10.1177/23259671241313474. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3
Management of First-Time Anterior Shoulder Dislocation-A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis: Arthroscopy Association of Canada Position Statement.
首次肩关节前脱位的管理——一项系统评价和荟萃分析:加拿大关节镜协会立场声明
Orthop J Sports Med. 2025 Feb 6;13(2):23259671251316893. doi: 10.1177/23259671251316893. eCollection 2025 Feb.
4
Latarjet procedure versus iliac crest autograft transfer for anterior shoulder instability: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.用于治疗肩关节前向不稳的Latarjet手术与髂嵴自体骨移植:一项比较研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Jan 30;20(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-05425-0.
5
Comparison of Revision and Redislocation Rates After First-Time Anterior Shoulder Instability Between Subluxators and Dislocators: A Midterm Outcome Study.首次肩关节前脱位患者中半脱位者与全脱位者翻修率和再脱位率的比较:一项中期结果研究
Orthop J Sports Med. 2024 Dec 11;12(12):23259671241298014. doi: 10.1177/23259671241298014. eCollection 2024 Dec.
6
Establishing Clinical Significance for Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Repair of Type II SLAP Lesions.确定接受关节镜下Ⅱ型SLAP损伤修复患者的临床意义。
Orthop J Sports Med. 2024 Nov 11;12(11):23259671241286520. doi: 10.1177/23259671241286520. eCollection 2024 Nov.
7
Establishing Clinically Significant Improvement for Patients After Arthroscopic Surgery for Shoulder Instability With Large Labral Tears.为伴有巨大盂唇撕裂的肩关节不稳患者进行关节镜手术后确立具有临床意义的改善情况。
Orthop J Sports Med. 2024 Nov 5;12(11):23259671241284676. doi: 10.1177/23259671241284676. eCollection 2024 Nov.
8
Prognostic factors for recurrent instability in recreational athletes following arthroscopic Bankart repair: a retrospective study with an average 4.1-year follow-up.关节镜下Bankart修复术后业余运动员复发性不稳定的预后因素:一项平均随访4.1年的回顾性研究
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2024 Jun 24;16(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s13102-024-00925-2.
9
Reconsidering "Critical" Bone Loss in Shoulder Instability: 17-Year Follow-Up Study following Arthroscopic Bankart Repair.重新审视肩关节不稳中的“严重”骨质流失:关节镜下Bankart修复术后17年随访研究
Adv Orthop. 2024 Jan 31;2024:5598107. doi: 10.1155/2024/5598107. eCollection 2024.
10
Patients Have a 15% Redislocation Rate After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair With a Knotless Technique.采用无结技术进行关节镜下Bankart修复术后,患者的再脱位率为15%。
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2024 Jan 14;6(1):100864. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2023.100864. eCollection 2024 Feb.