Edward Grey Institute, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PS, United Kingdom
Edward Grey Institute, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PS, United Kingdom.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Jan 2;115(1):E53-E61. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1710450115. Epub 2017 Dec 18.
Sexual selection is a fundamental evolutionary process but remains debated, particularly in the complexity of polyandrous populations where females mate with multiple males. This lack of resolution is partly because studies have largely ignored the structure of the sexual network, that is, the pattern of mate sharing. Here, we quantify what we call mating assortment with network analysis to specify explicitly the indirect as well as direct relationships between partners. We first review empirical studies, showing that mating assortment varies considerably in nature, due largely to basic properties of the sexual network (size and density) and partly to nonrandom patterns of mate sharing. We then use simulations to show how variation in mating assortment interacts with population-level polyandry to determine the strength of sexual selection on males. Controlling for average polyandry, positive mating assortment, arising when more polygynous males tend to mate with more polyandrous females, drastically decreases the intensity of precopulatory sexual selection on male mating success (Bateman gradient) and the covariance between male mating success and postcopulatory paternity share. Average polyandry independently weakened some measures of sexual selection and crucially also impacted sexual selection indirectly by constraining mating assortment through the saturation of the mating network. Mating assortment therefore represents a key-albeit overlooked-modulator of the strength of sexual selection. Our results show that jointly considering sexual network structure and average polyandry more precisely describes the strength of sexual selection.
性选择是一个基本的进化过程,但仍存在争议,特别是在多配偶制种群的复杂性中,雌性与多个雄性交配。这种缺乏解决的部分原因是,研究在很大程度上忽略了性网络的结构,即伴侣共享的模式。在这里,我们使用网络分析来量化我们所谓的交配组合,明确指出伴侣之间的间接和直接关系。我们首先回顾了实证研究,表明交配组合在自然界中差异很大,主要是由于性网络的基本特性(大小和密度),部分是由于伴侣共享的非随机模式。然后,我们使用模拟来展示交配组合的变化如何与群体水平的多配偶制相互作用,以确定雄性的性选择强度。在控制平均多配偶制的情况下,当更多的一妻多夫雄性倾向于与更多的多配偶制雌性交配时,阳性交配组合会极大地降低雄性交配成功的前交配性选择强度(Bateman 梯度)和雄性交配成功与后交配父权分享之间的协方差。平均多配偶制独立地削弱了一些性选择的衡量标准,并且通过性网络的饱和来限制交配组合,关键是间接地影响性选择。因此,交配组合是性选择强度的一个关键调节因素(尽管被忽视了)。我们的结果表明,同时考虑性网络结构和平均多配偶制更准确地描述了性选择的强度。