Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Center for Human Genetics, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2017 Dec;25(12):1313-1323. doi: 10.1038/s41431-017-0004-3. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
In inherited primary arrhythmia syndromes (PAS) and cardiomyopathies (CMP), the yield of genetic testing varies between 20 and 75% in different diseases according to studies performed in the pre next-generation sequencing (NGS) era. It is unknown whether retesting historical negative samples with NGS techniques is worthwhile. Therefore, we assessed the value of NGS-based panel testing in previously genotype negative-phenotype positive probands. We selected 107 patients (47 PAS and 60 CMP) with a clear phenotype who remained genotype negative after genetic analysis of the main genes implicated in their specific phenotype. Targeted sequencing of the coding regions of 71 PAS- and CMP-related genes was performed. Variant interpretation and classification was done according to a cardiology-specific scoring algorithm ('Amsterdam criteria') and the ACMG-AMP criteria. Co-segregation analysis was performed when DNA and clinical data of family members were available. Finally, a genetic diagnosis could be established in 21 patients (20%), 5 PAS (11%) and 16 CMP (27%) patients, respectively. The increased detection rate was due to sequencing of novel genes in 52% of the cases and due to technical failures with the historical analysis in 48%. A total of 118 individuals were informed about their carrier state and either reassured or scheduled for proper follow-up. To conclude, genetic retesting in clinically overt PAS and CMP cases, who were genotype negative with older techniques, resulted in an additional genetic diagnosis in up to 20% of the cases. This clearly supports a policy for genetic retesting with NGS-based panels.
在遗传性原发性心律失常综合征(PAS)和心肌病(CMP)中,根据前下一代测序(NGS)时代进行的研究,不同疾病的基因检测阳性率在 20%至 75%之间变化。尚不清楚使用 NGS 技术重新检测历史阴性样本是否值得。因此,我们评估了基于 NGS 的面板检测在先前基因型阴性表型阳性先证者中的价值。我们选择了 107 名(47 名 PAS 和 60 名 CMP)具有明确表型的患者,这些患者在遗传分析主要基因后仍为基因型阴性,这些基因与他们特定的表型有关。对 71 个 PAS 和 CMP 相关基因的编码区进行靶向测序。根据特定于心脏病学的评分算法(“阿姆斯特丹标准”)和 ACMG-AMP 标准进行变异解释和分类。当家族成员的 DNA 和临床数据可用时,进行共分离分析。最终,在 21 名患者(20%)、5 名 PAS(11%)和 16 名 CMP(27%)患者中可以建立遗传诊断。检测率的提高是由于在 52%的病例中测序了新基因,在 48%的病例中由于历史分析的技术故障。总共 118 人了解了他们的携带状态,并对其进行了适当的随访或安慰。总之,对临床明显的 PAS 和 CMP 病例进行基因重新检测,这些病例在旧技术下基因型为阴性,结果在多达 20%的病例中发现了额外的遗传诊断。这明确支持使用基于 NGS 的面板进行遗传重新检测的政策。