Raysin Anetta, Gillett Brian, Carmody Joseph, Goel Nidhi, McAfee Scot, Jacob Theresa
Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
Acad Psychiatry. 2018 Oct;42(5):653-658. doi: 10.1007/s40596-017-0859-1. Epub 2017 Dec 18.
This study was intended to develop a new educational model that supplements ECT didactics with simulation-based procedural training and to evaluate the learning gains conferred by such a curriculum.
Two types of curricula were evaluated for educational efficacy in this prospective randomized controlled trial. Psychiatry residents (n = 35) completed surveys to ascertain their baseline experience, knowledge, and proficiency with the ECT procedure. They were then block-randomized to receive either a didactic ECT curriculum (non-SIM) or one augmented by simulation training (SIM). Three months post-completion of the two types of instruction, all residents were re-administered the surveys and a procedural post-assessment.
The median number of ECTs performed prior to the study was similar between the two groups (SIM group = 3, non-SIM group = 4.) The SIM group showed significant improvement on pre- and post- survey theoretical knowledge scores: 51% (95% CI = 41 to 61%) and 69% (95% CI = 64 to 74%), respectively, p = .02; this difference was not significant in the non-SIM group, p = .2. Improvement between pre- and post- proficiency scores were seen in the SIM group: 22% (95% CI = 13 to 32%) and 51% (95% CI = 53 to 59%), p < .001 while the effect was less pronounced in the non-SIM group. Inter-rater agreement for the proficiency assessment was excellent: k, = .9.
Residents showed significant improvement in knowledge, comfort, and skills following ECT simulation training. With the proposed curriculum, residents would receive comprehensive education not only in the theory behind ECT but also in procedural skills. This curriculum can be modeled in other programs that do not have extensive ECT facilities.
本研究旨在开发一种新的教育模式,通过基于模拟的程序训练来补充电休克治疗(ECT)教学法,并评估这种课程带来的学习收获。
在这项前瞻性随机对照试验中,对两种类型的课程进行了教育效果评估。精神科住院医师(n = 35)完成了调查,以确定他们在ECT程序方面的基线经验、知识和熟练程度。然后,他们被整群随机分组,分别接受ECT教学课程(非模拟组)或通过模拟训练增强的课程(模拟组)。在完成两种类型的教学三个月后,所有住院医师再次接受调查和程序后评估。
研究前进行ECT的中位数在两组之间相似(模拟组 = 3,非模拟组 = 4)。模拟组在调查前和调查后的理论知识得分有显著提高:分别为51%(95%CI = 41%至61%)和69%(95%CI = 64%至74%),p = 0.02;在非模拟组中,这种差异不显著,p = 0.2。模拟组在熟练程度得分的前后有改善:22%(95%CI = 13%至32%)和51%(95%CI = 53%至59%),p < 0.001,而在非模拟组中效果不太明显。熟练程度评估的评分者间一致性非常好:k = 0.9。
住院医师在接受ECT模拟训练后,在知识、舒适度和技能方面有显著提高。通过所提出的课程,住院医师不仅将接受ECT背后理论的全面教育,还将接受程序技能的教育。这种课程可以在没有广泛ECT设施的其他项目中进行模仿。