Baystate Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Baystate Simulation Center and Tufts University School of Medicine, Springfield, MA, USA.
J Surg Educ. 2012 Mar-Apr;69(2):242-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2011.08.007.
PURPOSE: Preparatory training for new trainees beginning residency has been used by a variety of programs across the country. To improve the clinical orientation process for our new postgraduate year (PGY)-1 residents, we developed an intensive preparatory training curriculum inclusive of cognitive and procedural skills, training activities considered essential for early PGY-1 clinical management. We define our surgical PGY-1 Boot Camp as preparatory simulation-based training implemented at the onset of internship for introduction of skills necessary for basic surgical patient problem assessment and management. This orientation process includes exposure to simulated patient care encounters and technical skills training essential to new resident education. We report educational results of 4 successive years of Boot Camp training. Results were analyzed to determine if performance evidenced at onset of training was predictive of later educational outcomes. METHODS: Learners were PGY-1 residents, in both categorical and preliminary positions, at our medium-sized surgical residency program. Over a 4-year period, from July 2007 to July 2010, all 30 PGY-1 residents starting surgical residency at our institution underwent specific preparatory didactic and skills training over a 9-week period. This consisted of mandatory weekly 1-hour and 3-hour sessions in the Simulation Center, representing a 4-fold increase in time in simulation laboratory training compared with the remainder of the year. Training occurred in 8 procedural skills areas (instrument use, knot-tying, suturing, laparoscopic skills, airway management, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, central venous catheter, and chest tube insertion) and in simulated patient care (shock, surgical emergencies, and respiratory, cardiac, and trauma management) using a variety of high- and low-tech simulation platforms. Faculty and senior residents served as instructors. All educational activities were structured to include preparatory materials, pretraining briefing sessions, and immediate in-training or post-training review and debriefing. Baseline cognitive skills were assessed with written tests on basic patient management. Post-Boot Camp tests similarly evaluated cognitive skills. Technical skills were assessed using a variety of task-specific instruments, and expressed as a mean score for all activities for each resident. All measurements were expressed as percent (%) best possible score. Cognitive and technical performance in Boot Camp was compared with subsequent clinical and core curriculum evaluations including weekly quiz scores, annual American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination (ABSITE) scores, program in-training evaluations (New Innovations, Uniontown, Ohio), and operative assessment instrument scores (OP-Rate, Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, Massachusetts) for the remainder of the PGY-1 year. RESULTS: Performance data were available for 30 PGY-1 residents over 4 years. Baseline cognitive skills were lower for the first year of Boot Camp as compared with subsequent years (71 ± 13, 83 ± 9, 84 ± 11, and 86 ± 6, respectively; p = 0.028, analysis of variance; ANOVA). Performance improved between pretests and final testing (81 ± 11 vs 89 ± 7; p < 0.001 paired t test). There was statistically significant correlation between Boot Camp final cognitive test results and American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination scores (p = 0.01; n = 22), but not quite significant for weekly curriculum quiz scores (p = 0.055; n = 22) and New Innovations cognitive assessments (p = 0.09; n = 25). Statistically significant correlation was also noted between Boot Camp mean overall skills and New Innovations technical skills assessments (p = 0.002; n = 25) and OP-Rate assessments (p = 0.01; n = 12). CONCLUSIONS: Individual simulation-based Boot Camp performance scores for cognitive and procedural skills assessments in PGY-1 residents correlate with subjective and objective clinical performance evaluations. This concurrent correlation with multiple traditional evaluation methods used to express competency in our residency program supports the use of Boot Camp performance measures as needs assessment tools as well as adjuncts to cumulative resident evaluation data.
目的:全国各地的各种项目都使用了预备培训,为开始住院实习的新学员做好准备。为了改善我们新的住院医师培训生(PGY-1)的临床定向过程,我们开发了一个密集的预备培训课程,包括认知和程序技能,这些技能被认为是早期 PGY-1 临床管理所必需的。我们将我们的外科 PGY-1 训练营定义为在实习开始时实施的基于模拟的预备培训,以介绍基本外科患者问题评估和管理所需的技能。这个定向过程包括接触模拟患者护理遭遇和对新居民教育至关重要的技术技能培训。我们报告了 4 年训练营培训的教育成果。分析结果以确定培训开始时的表现是否可以预测后来的教育成果。
方法:学习者是我们中等规模的外科住院医师培训计划中的 PGY-1 住院医师,包括分类和初步职位。在 2007 年 7 月至 2010 年 7 月的 4 年期间,我们机构所有 30 名开始外科住院医师培训的 PGY-1 住院医师都在模拟中心接受了特定的预备性理论和技能培训,为期 9 周。这比一年中的其他时间增加了 4 倍的模拟实验室培训时间。培训涉及 8 个程序技能领域(仪器使用、打结、缝合、腹腔镜技能、气道管理、心肺复苏、中心静脉导管和胸腔管插入)和模拟患者护理(休克、外科紧急情况以及呼吸、心脏和创伤管理),使用各种高科技和低科技模拟平台。教员和高级住院医师担任指导员。所有教育活动都包括预备材料、培训前简介会议以及即时培训或培训后审查和讨论。基本认知技能通过基本患者管理的书面测试进行评估。基础训练营测试也评估了认知技能。技术技能使用各种特定任务的仪器进行评估,并为每位居民的所有活动计算出平均分数。所有测量结果均表示为最佳可能分数的百分比(%)。将训练营中的认知和技术表现与随后的临床和核心课程评估进行比较,包括每周测验成绩、年度美国外科学委员会住院医师考试(ABSITE)成绩、计划住院医师评估(新创新,联合镇,俄亥俄州)和手术评估工具评分(OP-Rate,Baystate 医疗中心,马萨诸塞州斯普林菲尔德)。
结果:在 4 年期间,有 30 名 PGY-1 住院医师的绩效数据。与随后的年份相比,第一年的训练营的基线认知技能较低(分别为 71 ± 13、83 ± 9、84 ± 11 和 86 ± 6;p = 0.028,方差分析;ANOVA)。预测试和最终测试之间的表现有所提高(81 ± 11 与 89 ± 7;p < 0.001 配对 t 检验)。训练营最终认知测试结果与美国外科学委员会住院医师考试成绩之间存在显著的相关性(p = 0.01;n = 22),但与每周课程测验成绩(p = 0.055;n = 22)和新创新认知评估(p = 0.09;n = 25)相关性不太显著。训练营的平均整体技能与新创新技术技能评估(p = 0.002;n = 25)和 OP-Rate 评估(p = 0.01;n = 12)之间也存在显著的相关性。
结论:PGY-1 住院医师认知和程序技能评估的个别基于模拟的训练营表现分数与主观和客观临床表现评估相关。这种与我们住院医师培训计划中使用的多种传统评估方法的并行相关性支持使用训练营表现测量作为需求评估工具以及作为累积住院医师评估数据的补充。
Surg Endosc. 2024-9
J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2024-4-1
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2023-12
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2023-4-19
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2023-4-1
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022-10-19
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022-6-4