1 Endocrine Institute, Department of ENT, Assaf Harofeh Medical Center , Zerifin, Israel .
2 Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University , Tel-Aviv, Israel .
Thyroid. 2018 Feb;28(2):201-209. doi: 10.1089/thy.2017.0265. Epub 2018 Jan 22.
Facing the prevailing concept that increased diagnosis with no change in mortality drives the increased incidence of differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC), considerable modifications have been introduced in the new edition of the tumor node metastasis (TNM)/American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system. The aim of this study was to compare a group of DTC patients before and after restaging, by mortality, disease severity, and disease outcomes.
DTC patients (N = 433) were restaged according to the eighth TNM/AJCC edition, and the results were compared to the seventh edition for clinicopathologic data, treatment modalities, and disease outcomes.
When switched to the eighth edition, 97.5% of patients fell into stage I-II compared to 76.4% before, and only 11/102 patients remained in stages III-IV. Disease-specific mortality was recorded in 11/433 patients, six of whom were in stages I-II upon restaging, compared to none before (p > 0.05). In addition, more recurrences were seen in stages II (p = 0.05) and III (p = 0.03) using the eighth edition compared to the seventh edition. Stage II was affected the most, with recurrence risk increasing from 29% to 76% (p = 0.001) and persistence at last visit from 19% to 43% when switching to the eighth edition (p = 0.01). Considering stages I and II together, the recurrence risk increased from 16.7% to 28.2% (p = 0.01), lymph node metastases from 1.9% to 26.5% (p = 0.01), and persistence at last visit from 10% to 15% (p > 0.05). Of the 129 patients in the 45- to 54-year-old age group, 53 shifted to stage I (20 from stage II, 29 from stage III, and 4 from stage IV) and five shifted to stage II (all from stage IV). When comparing this age group in stage II only, the eighth edition showed more lymph node metastases (p = 0.001), more distant metastases (p = 0.003), higher recurrence risk (p = 0.002), and more persistence at the last visit (p > 0.05).
The eighth TNM/AJCC edition provides a more accurate system to discriminate mortality and persistence in DTC patients. Yet, the severity of disease, especially in the 45- to 55-year-old age group and in stage II patients, should not be underestimated following the downstaging of these patients.
面对诊断增加而死亡率不变导致分化型甲状腺癌(DTC)发病率增加的主流观念,新的肿瘤-淋巴结-转移(TNM)/美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)分期系统在第 8 版中进行了相当大的修改。本研究的目的是通过死亡率、疾病严重程度和疾病结局比较 DTC 患者分期前后的情况。
根据第 8 版 TNM/AJCC 对 433 例 DTC 患者进行重新分期,并将第 7 版的临床病理数据、治疗方式和疾病结局进行比较。
与第 7 版相比,97.5%的患者归入第 I-II 期,而之前为 76.4%,仅有 11/102 例患者仍处于第 III-IV 期。433 例患者中有 11 例记录到疾病特异性死亡率,其中 6 例在重新分期时处于 I-II 期,而之前没有(p>0.05)。此外,与第 7 版相比,第 8 版中第 II 期(p=0.05)和第 III 期(p=0.03)的复发率更高。第 II 期受影响最大,复发风险从 29%增加到 76%(p=0.001),从第 7 版到第 8 版,最后一次就诊时的持续存在率从 19%增加到 43%(p=0.01)。考虑到第 I 期和第 II 期,复发风险从 16.7%增加到 28.2%(p=0.01),淋巴结转移从 1.9%增加到 26.5%(p=0.01),最后一次就诊时的持续存在率从 10%增加到 15%(p>0.05)。在 45-54 岁年龄组的 129 例患者中,有 53 例转为 I 期(20 例从 II 期,29 例从 III 期,4 例从 IV 期),5 例转为 II 期(均从 IV 期)。在比较仅处于 II 期的该年龄组时,第 8 版显示出更多的淋巴结转移(p=0.001)、更多的远处转移(p=0.003)、更高的复发风险(p=0.002)和更多的最后一次就诊时的持续存在(p>0.05)。
第 8 版 TNM/AJCC 提供了一个更准确的系统来区分 DTC 患者的死亡率和持续性。然而,疾病的严重程度,尤其是在 45-55 岁年龄组和 II 期患者中,不应低估这些患者的分期降级后疾病的严重程度。