1 Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Surgery, Division of Cancer Prevention and Population Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston, Texas.
2 Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University , Bangkok, Thailand .
Thyroid. 2018 Oct;28(10):1301-1310. doi: 10.1089/thy.2017.0572.
The American Joint Committee on Cancer Cancer Staging System for differentiated thyroid cancer has been recently revised. The purpose of this study was to compare survival prognostication between the seventh and eighth editions.
We retrospectively reviewed 2579 differentiated thyroid cancer patients who underwent surgery at MD Anderson Cancer Center between 2000 and 2015. Disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using log rank test. The effect of potential predictor was estimated using Cox proportional hazards model. Power of survival prediction was estimated using Harrell's C concordance index (C-index), and predictive capacities for DSS were estimated using proportion of variance explained (PVE).
Revision of tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) categories, age cutoff, and stage reassignment in the 8 edition caused reclassification of overall stage compared with the seventh edition. The proportion of patients in stage I and II increased from 62% to 83% and 5% to 12%, respectively, while the proportion of patients in stage III and IV decreased from 20% to 2% and 14% to 3%, respectively. Ten-year DSS for stages I-IV based on the seventh edition were 100%, 97.5%, 98.3%, and 82.6%, respectively, while 10-year DSS for the corresponding stage in the eighth edition were 99.8%, 88.3%, 72.4%, and 71.9%, respectively. In multivariate analysis for both seventh edition (C-index 0.94, PVE 4.6%) and eighth edition (C-index 0.94, PVE 4.8%), the factors predictive of worse outcome for DSS were older age, advanced tumor size category, and distant metastasis while cervical lymph node metastases did not predict worse survival. For the eighth edition, patients <55 years of age with stage II disease had significantly worse DSS (p < 0.001) than patients ≥55 years with stage II disease but appeared to be similar to patients ≥55 years with stage III (p = 0.742) and IV disease (p = 0.566). Patients ≥55 years old with T3a and T3b disease had 10-year DSS of 67% and 92%, respectively (p = 0.390).
The AJCC eighth edition is similar to the seventh edition in disease-specific survival prediction. Potential modifications that may improve disease-specific survival prediction in future renditions include reconsideration of T3b tumor category and upstaging classification of patients <55 years of age with distant metastases.
美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)的甲状腺癌分期系统最近进行了修订。本研究旨在比较第七版和第八版的生存预后。
我们回顾性分析了 2000 年至 2015 年间在 MD 安德森癌症中心接受手术治疗的 2579 例分化型甲状腺癌患者。使用 Kaplan-Meier 方法估计疾病特异性生存率(DSS)和总生存率,并使用对数秩检验进行比较。使用 Cox 比例风险模型估计潜在预测因子的影响。使用 Harrell 的 C 一致性指数(C-index)估计生存预测的效能,并使用方差解释比例(PVE)估计 DSS 的预测能力。
第八版对肿瘤-淋巴结-转移(TNM)分类、年龄截断值和分期重新分类,导致与第七版相比,总体分期发生了重新分类。I 期和 II 期患者的比例分别从 62%增加到 83%和 5%增加到 12%,而 III 期和 IV 期患者的比例分别从 20%减少到 2%和 14%减少到 3%。第七版的 I-IV 期患者的 10 年 DSS 分别为 100%、97.5%、98.3%和 82.6%,而第八版的对应分期的 10 年 DSS 分别为 99.8%、88.3%、72.4%和 71.9%。在第七版(C-index 0.94,PVE 4.6%)和第八版(C-index 0.94,PVE 4.8%)的多变量分析中,与 DSS 预后不良相关的因素是年龄较大、肿瘤较大类别和远处转移,而颈部淋巴结转移并不能预测较差的生存。对于第八版,年龄<55 岁且处于 II 期的患者的 DSS 明显较差(p<0.001),与年龄≥55 岁且处于 II 期的患者相似,但与年龄≥55 岁且处于 III 期(p=0.742)和 IV 期(p=0.566)的患者相似。年龄≥55 岁且 T3a 和 T3b 疾病的患者 10 年 DSS 分别为 67%和 92%(p=0.390)。
AJCC 第八版在疾病特异性生存预测方面与第七版相似。未来版本中可能需要改进以提高疾病特异性生存预测的因素包括重新考虑 T3b 肿瘤类别以及对年龄<55 岁且有远处转移的患者进行分期升级。