Philpot Lindsey M, Barnes Sunni A, Brown Rachel M, Austin Jessica A, James Cameron S, Stanford Richard H, Ebbert Jon O
1 Mayo Clinic Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Rochester, MN.
2 Baylor Scott & White Health, Dallas, TX.
Am J Med Qual. 2018 Jul;33(4):359-364. doi: 10.1177/1062860617745986. Epub 2017 Dec 19.
Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) provide information on how health care affects patient health and well-being and represent a patient-centered approach. Despite this potential, PROs are not widely used in clinical settings. Semi-structured focus groups were conducted with 3 stakeholder groups (patients, providers, and health care administrators) to determine the top 5 perceived barriers and benefits of PRO implementation. The Delphi technique was employed to obtain consensus and rank order responses. Patients perceived survey length to be important, whereas providers and administrators perceived time to collect data and patient health literacy, respectively, as the greatest barriers to PRO implementation. The greatest perceived benefits were the ability to track changes in clinical symptoms over time, improved quality of care, and better disease control among patients, providers, and administrators, respectively. These results may guide the development of novel frameworks for PRO implementation by addressing perceived barriers and building on the perceived benefits to encourage adoption of PROs.
患者报告结局(PROs)提供了有关医疗保健如何影响患者健康和福祉的信息,并代表了一种以患者为中心的方法。尽管有这种潜力,但PROs在临床环境中并未得到广泛应用。对三个利益相关者群体(患者、医疗服务提供者和医疗保健管理人员)进行了半结构化焦点小组访谈,以确定PROs实施中被认为最重要的五大障碍和益处。采用德尔菲技术以达成共识并对回答进行排序。患者认为调查问卷长度很重要,而医疗服务提供者和管理人员分别认为收集数据的时间和患者的健康素养是PROs实施的最大障碍。被认为最大的益处分别是能够随时间跟踪临床症状的变化、改善护理质量以及患者、医疗服务提供者和管理人员更好地控制疾病。这些结果可能会通过解决所察觉到的障碍并基于所察觉到的益处来鼓励采用PROs,从而指导PROs实施新框架的开发。