• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

艰难梭菌分类高估了医院获得性感染。

Clostridium difficile classification overestimates hospital-acquired infections.

机构信息

Research School of Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.

Research School of Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.

出版信息

J Hosp Infect. 2018 Aug;99(4):453-460. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2017.12.014. Epub 2017 Dec 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.jhin.2017.12.014
PMID:29258917
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clostridium difficile infections occur frequently among hospitalized patients, with some infections acquired in hospital and others in the community. International guidelines classify cases as hospital-acquired if symptom onset occurs more than two days after admission. This classification informs surveillance and infection control, but has not been verified by empirical or modelling studies.

AIM

To assess current classification of C. difficile acquisition using a simulation model as a reference standard.

METHODS

C. difficile transmission was simulated in a range of hospital scenarios. The sensitivity, specificity and precision of classifications that use cut-offs ranging from 0.25 h to 40 days were calculated. The optimal cut-off that correctly estimated the proportion of cases that were hospital acquired and the balanced cut-off that had equal sensitivity and specificity were identified.

FINDINGS

The recommended two-day cut-off overestimated the incidence of hospital-acquired cases in all scenarios and by >100% in the base scenario. The two-day cut-off had good sensitivity (96%) but poor specificity (48%) and precision (52%) to identify cases acquired during the current hospitalization. A five-day cut-off was balanced, and a six-day cut-off was optimal in the base scenario. The optimal and balanced cut-offs were more than two days for nearly all scenarios considered (ranges: four to nine days and two to eight days, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Current guidelines for classifying C. difficile infections overestimate the proportion of cases acquired in hospital in all model scenarios. To reduce misclassification bias, an infection should be classified as being acquired prior to admission if symptoms begin within five days of admission.

摘要

背景

艰难梭菌感染在住院患者中很常见,有些感染是在医院获得的,有些是在社区获得的。国际指南将症状出现于入院后超过两天的感染病例归类为医院获得性感染。这种分类方法为监测和感染控制提供了依据,但尚未通过实证或模型研究得到验证。

目的

使用模拟模型作为参考标准,评估当前艰难梭菌感染的分类方法。

方法

在一系列医院场景中模拟艰难梭菌的传播。计算了使用 0.25 小时至 40 天的时间间隔作为分类截止值的分类方法的灵敏度、特异性和精度。确定了正确估计医院获得性病例比例的最佳截止值和具有相等灵敏度和特异性的平衡截止值。

结果

在所有场景中,推荐的两天截止值都高估了医院获得性病例的发生率,在基础场景中高估了 100%以上。两天截止值对识别当前住院期间获得的病例具有良好的灵敏度(96%),但特异性(48%)和精度(52%)较差。五天截止值是平衡的,在基础场景中六天截止值是最佳的。对于考虑的几乎所有场景,最佳和平衡截止值都超过两天(范围分别为四天至九天和两天至八天)。

结论

目前用于分类艰难梭菌感染的指南在所有模型场景中都高估了医院获得性病例的比例。为了减少分类偏倚,如果症状在入院后五天内出现,应将感染归类为入院前获得。

相似文献

1
Clostridium difficile classification overestimates hospital-acquired infections.艰难梭菌分类高估了医院获得性感染。
J Hosp Infect. 2018 Aug;99(4):453-460. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2017.12.014. Epub 2017 Dec 16.
2
Comparison of Clostridium difficile Ribotypes Circulating in Australian Hospitals and Communities.澳大利亚医院和社区中艰难梭菌核糖型的比较
J Clin Microbiol. 2016 Dec 28;55(1):216-225. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01779-16. Print 2017 Jan.
3
Community-acquired Clostridium difficile: epidemiology, ribotype, risk factors, hospital and intensive care unit outcomes, and current and emerging therapies.社区获得性艰难梭菌:流行病学、核糖体分型、危险因素、医院和重症监护病房结局以及现有和新兴治疗方法。
J Hosp Infect. 2018 Aug;99(4):436-442. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2018.01.015. Epub 2018 Mar 26.
4
A Successful Strategy to Decrease Hospital-Onset Clostridium difficile.降低医院获得性艰难梭菌感染的成功策略
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2018 Feb;39(2):234-236. doi: 10.1017/ice.2017.289. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
5
Enhanced surveillance of Clostridium difficile infection occurring outside hospital, England, 2011 to 2013.强化监测英格兰地区 2011 至 2013 年发生在医院外的艰难梭菌感染。
Euro Surveill. 2016 Jul 21;21(29). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2016.21.29.30295.
6
Clostridium difficile infection in the Republic of Ireland: results of a 1-month national surveillance and ribotyping project, March 2009.爱尔兰共和国艰难梭菌感染情况:2009年3月为期1个月的全国监测及核糖分型项目结果
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010 Oct;31(10):1085-7. doi: 10.1086/656376.
7
Multidrug-resistant North American pulsotype 2 Clostridium difficile was the predominant toxigenic hospital-acquired strain in the province of Manitoba, Canada, in 2006-2007.2006-2007 年,加拿大马尼托巴省主要的医院获得性产毒耐药北美脉冲型 2 型艰难梭菌为多药耐药艰难梭菌。
J Med Microbiol. 2012 May;61(Pt 5):693-700. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.041053-0. Epub 2012 Feb 2.
8
Population-based surveillance of Clostridium difficile infection in Manitoba, Canada, by using interim surveillance definitions.加拿大曼尼托巴省采用临时监测定义对艰难梭菌感染进行基于人群的监测。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2009 Oct;30(10):945-51. doi: 10.1086/605719.
9
Hospital-based epidemiology: a strategy for 'dealing with Clostridium difficile'.基于医院的流行病学:应对艰难梭菌的策略。
J Hosp Infect. 2010 Apr;74(4):319-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2009.07.009. Epub 2009 Sep 1.
10
Clinical and molecular characteristics of community-acquired Clostridium difficile infections in comparison with those of hospital-acquired C. difficile.社区获得性艰难梭菌感染与医院获得性艰难梭菌感染的临床和分子特征比较
Anaerobe. 2017 Dec;48:42-46. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2017.06.014. Epub 2017 Jun 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Defining the phylogenetics and resistome of the major ribotypes circulating in Australia.定义在澳大利亚流行的主要核糖体型的系统发生学和抗性组。
Microb Genom. 2024 May;10(5). doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.001232.
2
Rethinking infection (CDI) surveillance definitions based on changing healthcare utilisation and a more realistic incubation period: reviewing data from a tertiary-referral hospital, Ireland, 2012 to 2021.重新思考基于医疗利用变化和更现实的潜伏期的感染(CDI)监测定义:审查爱尔兰一家三级转诊医院 2012 年至 2021 年的数据。
Euro Surveill. 2024 Feb;29(6). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2024.29.6.2300335.
3
Some simple rules for estimating reproduction numbers in the presence of reservoir exposure or imported cases.
在存在储存宿主暴露或输入病例的情况下估计繁殖数的一些简单规则。
Theor Popul Biol. 2020 Aug;134:182-194. doi: 10.1016/j.tpb.2020.04.002. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
4
Modelling diverse sources of Clostridium difficile in the community: importance of animals, infants and asymptomatic carriers.模拟社区中不同来源的艰难梭菌:动物、婴儿和无症状携带者的重要性。
Epidemiol Infect. 2019 Jan;147:e152. doi: 10.1017/S0950268819000384.