Lee Jun-Ku, Yoon Byung-Ho, Jung Kyunghun, Kim Gotak, Han Soo-Hong
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Bundang CHA Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea.
J Bone Metab. 2017 Nov;24(4):235-240. doi: 10.11005/jbm.2017.24.4.235. Epub 2017 Nov 30.
Authors assessed lean body mass (fat free tissue), upper and lower, and bone mineral density (BMD) in patients of osteoporotic bone distal radius fracture (DRF) and degenerative rotator cuff tear (RCT) patients of shoulder. We predict inferior muscle mass and osteoporosis are more frequent in DRF group than RCT group.
Between January 2016 and June 2017, overall 38 of DRF and 30 of RCT were eligible for this retrospective comparison study after excluding of patients with compounding factors. BMD and other body composition, fat and lean body mass, were assessed with a single dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in one hospital.
T-score of spine were -2.2 and -1.6 in DRF and RCT patients with significant difference (=0.040). Final BMD score, lower score of patient between spine and femoral score, of both group also presented difference with significance, -2.4 of DRF and -1.9 of RCT patients (=0.047). Diagnosis of osteoporosis was confirmed in 19 patients (50%) from DRF compared with 9 patients (30%) from RCT. The mean lean soft tissue mass of the arm was 3.7 kg and 3.8 kg in the DRF and RCT, respectively, without significant difference (=0.882). The mean lean body mass of the leg was 11.0 kg and 10.5 kg in the DRF and RCT, respectively, without significant difference (=0.189). The relative overall appendicular lean mass was not significantly different between groups.
Even though BMD difference, we did not find muscle mass difference between DRF and RCT patients.
作者评估了骨质疏松性桡骨远端骨折(DRF)患者和肩部退行性肩袖撕裂(RCT)患者的瘦体重(无脂肪组织)、上肢和下肢以及骨密度(BMD)。我们预测DRF组比RCT组的肌肉量更低和骨质疏松更常见。
在2016年1月至2017年6月期间,排除有复合因素的患者后,共有38例DRF患者和30例RCT患者符合这项回顾性比较研究的条件。在一家医院用单能双能X线吸收法评估骨密度和其他身体成分、脂肪和瘦体重。
DRF和RCT患者的脊柱T值分别为-2.2和-1.6,差异有统计学意义(P=0.040)。两组患者最终的骨密度评分,即脊柱和股骨评分中较低的患者评分,也有显著差异,DRF患者为-2.4,RCT患者为-1.9(P=0.047)。DRF组19例患者(50%)确诊为骨质疏松,而RCT组为9例患者(30%)。DRF组和RCT组手臂的平均瘦软组织量分别为3.7kg和3.8kg,无显著差异(P=0.882)。DRF组和RCT组腿部的平均瘦体重分别为11.0kg和10.5kg,无显著差异(P=0.189)。两组之间相对总体附属瘦体重无显著差异。
尽管骨密度有差异,但我们未发现DRF和RCT患者之间的肌肉量有差异。