1 Nepean Telehealth Technology Centre, Sydney Medical School , Sydney, Australia .
2 Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Technology, The University of Sydney , Sydney, Australia .
Telemed J E Health. 2018 Jul;24(7):552-559. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2017.0194. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
Benefits associated with telemedicine are contingent upon positive user perceptions. Despite this, research on user perceptions of telemedicine remains limited.
Usability approaches offer a robust way to assess user perceptions, but have rarely been applied in telemedicine. In this study, a usability approach was employed to examine how user perceptions toward a telemedicine system changed over the course of everyday use.
A telemedicine system was introduced to a hospital in the home service. Ten mobile nurses completed the System Usability Scale (SUS) after initial use, then again after 18 months of everyday use. Results were compared. Analysis included Bangor et al.'s (2009) adjective rating scale.
The initial SUS mean was 83 (standard deviation [SD] = 7.98), indicating "excellent" usability. After 18 months, the SUS mean was 64.38, indicating "OK" usability (SD = 14.25, p < 0.05, 95% confidence interval [CI]). Over time, users had lower desire to use the system frequently (p < 0.05, 95% CI), found it more complex (p < 0.05, 95% CI), and perceived greater inconsistency in its design (p < 0.05, 95% CI).
Considered with existing evidence, our usability findings indicate that a temporary period of positive user perceptions occurs when new telemedicine systems are used for the first few months. This fades with everyday use, with design inconsistency and perceived complexity becoming more noticeable. Although other factors such as user satisfaction and efficiency may also contribute, further studies are needed for confirmation.
User perceptions of telemedicine vary with time. To help maximize the benefits and longevity of telemedicine systems, responding to intermittent user appraisal is desirable.
远程医疗的益处取决于用户的积极看法。尽管如此,关于用户对远程医疗的看法的研究仍然有限。
可用性方法提供了一种评估用户看法的强大方法,但在远程医疗中很少应用。在这项研究中,采用了一种可用性方法来研究用户对远程医疗系统的看法如何随着日常使用而改变。
将远程医疗系统引入家庭医疗服务医院。十名移动护士在初次使用后和 18 个月的日常使用后完成了系统可用性量表(SUS)。结果进行了比较。分析包括 Bangor 等人(2009 年)的形容词评分量表。
初始 SUS 平均值为 83(标准差 [SD] = 7.98),表示“优秀”的可用性。18 个月后,SUS 平均值为 64.38,表示“尚可”的可用性(SD = 14.25,p < 0.05,95%置信区间 [CI])。随着时间的推移,用户频繁使用系统的意愿降低(p < 0.05,95% CI),发现系统更复杂(p < 0.05,95% CI),并认为系统设计的一致性较差(p < 0.05,95% CI)。
考虑到现有证据,我们的可用性研究结果表明,当新的远程医疗系统在最初几个月内使用时,用户的看法会出现暂时的积极期。随着日常使用的进行,这种情况会逐渐消失,设计的不一致性和感知的复杂性变得更加明显。尽管其他因素,如用户满意度和效率,也可能会产生影响,但还需要进一步的研究来证实。
用户对远程医疗的看法随时间而变化。为了最大限度地提高远程医疗系统的益处和寿命,需要对间歇性的用户评估做出回应。