Raccanello Daniela, Burro Roberto, Hall Rob
Department of Human Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Environmetrics Ltd, Pymble, Australia.
PLoS One. 2017 Dec 20;12(12):e0189633. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189633. eCollection 2017.
We explored whether and how the exposure to a natural disaster such as the 2012 Emilia Romagna earthquake affected the development of children's emotional competence in terms of understanding, regulating, and expressing emotions, after two years, when compared with a control group not exposed to the earthquake. We also examined the role of class level and gender.
The sample included two groups of children (n = 127) attending primary school: The experimental group (n = 65) experienced the 2012 Emilia Romagna earthquake, while the control group (n = 62) did not. The data collection took place two years after the earthquake, when children were seven or ten-year-olds. Beyond assessing the children's understanding of emotions and regulating abilities with standardized instruments, we employed semi-structured interviews to explore their knowledge of earthquakes and associated emotions, and a structured task on the intensity of some target emotions.
We applied Generalized Linear Mixed Models. Exposure to the earthquake did not influence the understanding and regulation of emotions. The understanding of emotions varied according to class level and gender. Knowledge of earthquakes, emotional language, and emotions associated with earthquakes were, respectively, more complex, frequent, and intense for children who had experienced the earthquake, and at increasing ages.
Our data extend the generalizability of theoretical models on children's psychological functioning following disasters, such as the dose-response model and the organizational-developmental model for child resilience, and provide further knowledge on children's emotional resources related to natural disasters, as a basis for planning educational prevention programs.
我们探究了2012年艾米利亚-罗马涅地震等自然灾害的暴露是否以及如何在两年后影响儿童在理解、调节和表达情绪方面的情绪能力发展,并与未经历地震的对照组进行比较。我们还研究了班级水平和性别的作用。
样本包括两组就读小学的儿童(n = 127):实验组(n = 65)经历了2012年艾米利亚-罗马涅地震,而对照组(n = 62)未经历。数据收集在地震发生两年后进行,当时儿童为7岁或10岁。除了用标准化工具评估儿童对情绪的理解和调节能力外,我们还采用半结构化访谈来探究他们对地震及相关情绪的了解,以及一项关于某些目标情绪强度的结构化任务。
我们应用了广义线性混合模型。地震暴露并未影响情绪的理解和调节。情绪理解因班级水平和性别而异。对于经历过地震的儿童以及年龄越大的儿童,对地震的了解、情绪语言和与地震相关的情绪分别更为复杂、频繁和强烈。
我们的数据扩展了灾害后儿童心理功能理论模型的普遍性,如儿童复原力的剂量反应模型和组织发展模型,并提供了关于儿童与自然灾害相关的情绪资源的进一步知识,作为规划教育预防项目的基础。