Landi A, De Santis G, Torricelli P, Colombo A, Bedeschi P
Institute of Orthopaedics, University of Modena, Italy.
J Hand Surg Br. 1989 Feb;14(1):49-52. doi: 10.1016/0266-7681(89)90015-6.
Differential diagnosis between true and pseudo-Volkmann's contracture should not be based on clinical grounds alone, because clinical data are often insufficient in determining the severity and the extent of muscle damage. CT has been utilised in 11 cases where a flexion contracture of the forearm muscles was present and corresponded closely with the surgical findings. True and pseudo-Volkmann's contracture can thus be distinguished and the severity and extent of the muscle damage determined.
真性与假性Volkmann挛缩的鉴别诊断不应仅基于临床依据，因为临床数据往往不足以确定肌肉损伤的严重程度和范围。在11例存在前臂肌肉屈曲挛缩的病例中使用了CT，其结果与手术 findings密切相符。由此可以区分真性与假性Volkmann挛缩，并确定肌肉损伤的严重程度和范围。 （注：这里“findings”直译为“发现”，结合语境不太好理解其准确意思，可能是指手术中的所见、结果等之类的意思，但按照要求不能添加解释，所以保留英文。）
