Moffat D A, Croxson G R, Baguley D M, Hardy D G
Department of Otolaryngology and Neurosurgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge.
J Laryngol Otol. 1989 Feb;103(2):169-72. doi: 10.1017/s0022215100108357.
A retrospective analysis of 76 patients who underwent acoustic neuroma removal is reported. Facial nerve function prior to surgery and tumour size are assessed with respect to final facial nerve recovery and the need for surgical rehabilitation. Both pre-operative facial weakness and tumour size greater than 2.5 cm. are shown to be predictive factors of poor facial nerve recovery. Multiple surgical rehabilitative procedures are often required when inadequate function and/or cosmetic results are obtained. Primary nerve repair and facial-hypoglossal anastomosis give better rehabilitative results than dynamic and static procedures. The association of tumour size greater than 2.5 cm. with increased risk of poor facial recovery re-emphasizes the need to detect and remove acoustic neuromas at an early stage.
