• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[复方黄黛片与三氧化二砷治疗45例急性早幼粒细胞白血病的疗效比较]

[Comparison of Curative Effect between Fu Fang Huang Dai Pian and Arsenic Trioxide in Treatment of 45 Patients with Acute Promyelocytic Leukaemia].

作者信息

Wang Jian, Huang Jun-Bin, Liu Zu-Lin, Zhang Bi-Hong, Xu Hong-Gui, Xue Hong-Man, Chen Chun

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510120, Guangdong Province, China.

Department of Pediatrics, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen 518017, Guangdong Province, China.

出版信息

Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2017 Dec;25(6):1605-1610. doi: 10.7534/j.issn.1009-2137.2017.06.004.

DOI:10.7534/j.issn.1009-2137.2017.06.004
PMID:29262883
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the clinical efficacy of Fu Fan Huang Dai Pian(RIF) and arsenic trioxide (ATO) regimens for treatment of children with acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) and to explore the risk factors affecting the prognosis of patients.

METHODS

The clinical data of 45 newly diagnosed APL children admitted in our hospital from January 2004 to May 2017 were analyzed retrospectively. Among 45 APL children, 25 children were treated by chemotherapetic regimen including RIF (RIF group), another 20 children were treated by chemotherapeutic regimen including ATO (ATO group). The follow-up was performed in all APL children. The prognosis and incidence of side reactions from drugs in 2 groups were compared, and the high risk factors affecting the prognosis of patients were analyzed.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 49.8% months. In RIF group, no early death occured in 25 APL children; 5 cases did not achieve complete remission (CR) after induction therapy, CR rate was 88%. Out of 25 cases 2 caes relapsed, 3 cases died, 20 cases maintained contined CR (CCR), 2 cases failed to be followed-up. In ATO group, 2 cases suffered from early death, 5 cases did not achieve CR after induction therapy, CR rate was 90%, 2 caese relapsed and died, 15 cases maintained CCR, the follow-up failed in 1 caes. The 5 year- OS and EFS rate in all the patients were predicted as (82.2±6.2)% and (76.4±6.6)% respectively. The OS and EFS rate in RIF group were (86.1±7.4)% and (78.4±8.6)% respectively, which were significantly different from OS and EFS rate (76.4%±10.6%) and (74.0%±10.1%) respectively in ATO group (all P>0.05). As for the side reaction from drug, except for the cardiac damage (P<0.05), incidence of other side reactions was not significantly different between 2 groups (P>0.05). In addition, the 5 year-OS and EFS rates in APL children with CNSL were significantly lower than those in APL children without CNSL (all P<0.05), the 5 year OS and EFS rate in APL children did not reache M1 and with high risk were significantly lower than those in APL children reached M1 after induction therapy and with low and standerd risk (P<0.05 and P<0.05); the 5 year-OS and EFS rates did not correlate with age and sex.

CONCLUSION

The Fu Fang Huang Dai Pian shows the therapeutic efficacy on APL children same as ATO, moreover, no obvious enhancement in incidence of side reactions is observed, therefore, the Fu Fang Huang Dai Pian is effective and safe for treatment of APL children. The CNSL, poor respond to treatment, high risk in clinical stratification are high risk factors affecting prognosis of patients.

摘要

目的

探讨复方黄黛片(RIF)与三氧化二砷(ATO)方案治疗儿童急性早幼粒细胞白血病(APL)的临床疗效,并探索影响患者预后的危险因素。

方法

回顾性分析2004年1月至2017年5月我院收治的45例新诊断APL患儿的临床资料。45例APL患儿中,25例采用含RIF的化疗方案治疗(RIF组),另20例采用含ATO的化疗方案治疗(ATO组)。对所有APL患儿进行随访。比较两组患儿的预后及药物不良反应发生率,并分析影响患者预后的高危因素。

结果

中位随访时间为49.8个月。RIF组25例APL患儿无早期死亡;诱导治疗后5例未达完全缓解(CR),CR率为88%。25例中2例复发,3例死亡,20例持续完全缓解(CCR),2例失访。ATO组2例早期死亡,诱导治疗后5例未达CR,CR率为90%,2例复发死亡,15例CCR,1例失访。所有患者的5年总生存率(OS)和无事件生存率(EFS)分别预计为(82.2±6.2)%和(76.4±6.6)%。RIF组的OS和EFS率分别为(86.1±7.4)%和(78.4±8.6)%,与ATO组的OS和EFS率分别为(76.4%±10.6%)和(74.0%±10.1%)相比,差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。在药物不良反应方面,除心脏损害外(P<0.05),两组其他不良反应发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。此外,合并中枢神经系统白血病(CNSL)的APL患儿的5年OS和EFS率显著低于无CNSL的APL患儿(均P<0.05),诱导治疗未达M1且高危的APL患儿的5年OS和EFS率显著低于诱导治疗达M1且低危和中危的APL患儿(P<0.05和P<0.05);5年OS和EFS率与年龄、性别无关。

结论

复方黄黛片对APL患儿的治疗效果与ATO相当,且未观察到不良反应发生率明显增加,因此,复方黄黛片治疗APL患儿有效且安全。CNSL、治疗反应差、临床分层高危是影响患者预后的高危因素。

相似文献

1
[Comparison of Curative Effect between Fu Fang Huang Dai Pian and Arsenic Trioxide in Treatment of 45 Patients with Acute Promyelocytic Leukaemia].[复方黄黛片与三氧化二砷治疗45例急性早幼粒细胞白血病的疗效比较]
Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2017 Dec;25(6):1605-1610. doi: 10.7534/j.issn.1009-2137.2017.06.004.
2
Long-term prognosis of childhood acute promyelocytic leukaemia with arsenic trioxide administration in induction and consolidation chemotherapy phases: a single-centre experience.三氧化二砷诱导和巩固化疗阶段治疗儿童急性早幼粒细胞白血病的长期预后:单中心经验。
Eur J Haematol. 2013 Dec;91(6):483-9. doi: 10.1111/ejh.12194. Epub 2013 Sep 17.
3
[Arsenic trioxide in combination with all-trans retinoic acid for acute promyelocytic leukemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis].三氧化二砷联合全反式维甲酸治疗急性早幼粒细胞白血病:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao. 2009 Nov;7(11):1024-34. doi: 10.3736/jcim20091102.
4
Oral tetra-arsenic tetra-sulfide formula versus intravenous arsenic trioxide as first-line treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.口服四砷四硫化物配方与静脉注射三氧化二砷作为急性早幼粒细胞白血病一线治疗的比较:一项多中心随机对照试验。
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Nov 20;31(33):4215-21. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.48.8312. Epub 2013 Oct 14.
5
[Comparison of efficacy and adverse effects between arsenic trioxide and all-trans retinoic acid in patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia].[三氧化二砷与全反式维甲酸治疗急性早幼粒细胞白血病的疗效及不良反应比较]
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao. 2009 Oct;31(5):555-8.
6
Long-term survey of outcome in acute promyelocytic leukemia.急性早幼粒细胞白血病的长期预后调查
Chin Med J (Engl). 2000 Feb;113(2):107-10. doi: 10.3901/jme.2000.08.107.
7
Treatment of acute promyelocytic leukaemia with all-trans retinoic acid and arsenic trioxide: a paradigm of synergistic molecular targeting therapy.全反式维甲酸和三氧化二砷治疗急性早幼粒细胞白血病:协同分子靶向治疗的范例
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2007 Jun 29;362(1482):959-71. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2007.2026.
8
[Retrospective analysis of 76 children with acute promyelocytic leukemia].
Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi. 2009 Sep;47(9):710-3.
9
Comparison of clinical outcomes of patients with relapsed acute promyelocytic leukemia induced with arsenic trioxide and consolidated with either an autologous stem cell transplant or an arsenic trioxide-based regimen.采用三氧化二砷诱导并分别采用自体干细胞移植或基于三氧化二砷的方案巩固治疗的复发急性早幼粒细胞白血病患者的临床结局比较。
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2009 Nov;15(11):1479-84. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2009.07.010. Epub 2009 Sep 1.
10
Meta-analysis of all-trans retinoic acid-linked arsenic trioxide treatment for acute promyelocytic leukemia.全反式维甲酸联合三氧化二砷治疗急性早幼粒细胞白血病的荟萃分析。
Hematology. 2014 Jun;19(4):202-7. doi: 10.1179/1607845413Y.0000000118. Epub 2013 Nov 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-term outcome of children with acute promyelocytic leukemia: a randomized study of oral versus intravenous arsenic by SCCLG-APL group.儿童急性早幼粒细胞白血病的长期疗效:SCCLG-APL 组口服与静脉用砷剂的随机研究。
Blood Cancer J. 2023 Dec 5;13(1):178. doi: 10.1038/s41408-023-00949-w.
2
The comparison of plasma arsenic concentration and urinary arsenic excretion during treatment with Realgar-Indigo naturalis formula and arsenic trioxide in children with acute promyelocytic leukemia.雄黄-青黛配方与三氧化二砷治疗儿童急性早幼粒细胞白血病时血浆砷浓度和尿砷排泄量的比较。
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2022 Jul;90(1):45-52. doi: 10.1007/s00280-022-04449-9. Epub 2022 Jun 27.
3
Multicenter randomized trial of arsenic trioxide and Realgar-Indigo naturalis formula in pediatric patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia: Interim results of the SCCLG-APL clinical study.
三氧化二砷与复方青黛胶囊治疗儿童急性早幼粒细胞白血病多中心随机对照研究:SCCLG-APL 临床研究的中期结果。
Am J Hematol. 2018 Dec;93(12):1467-1473. doi: 10.1002/ajh.25271. Epub 2018 Oct 20.