Pharmacologie Cellulaire et Moléculaire, Louvain Drug Research Institute, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Pole of Pharmacology, Institute of Experimental and Clinical Research, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018 Feb 23;62(3). doi: 10.1128/AAC.01599-17. Print 2018 Mar.
Linezolid, the first clinically available oxazolidinone antibiotic, causes potentially severe toxicities (myelosuppression, lactic acidosis, and neuropathies) ascribed to impairment of mitochondrial protein synthesis and consecutive mitochondrial dysfunction. Tedizolid, a newly approved oxazolidinone, shows an enhanced activity compared to linezolid but is also a more potent inhibitor of mitochondrial protein synthesis. We compared linezolid and tedizolid for (i) inhibition of the expression of subunit I of cytochrome -oxidase (CYTox I; Western blot analysis), (ii) cytochrome -oxidase activity (biochemical assay), (iii) mitochondrial oxidative metabolism (Seahorse technology), and (iv) alteration of mitochondrial ultrastructure (electron microscopy) using HL-60 promyelocytes and THP-1 monocytes exposed to microbiologically (multiples of modal MIC against ) and therapeutically ( - ) pertinent concentrations. Both drugs caused a rapid and complete (48 to 72 h) inhibition of CYTox I expression, cytochrome -oxidase activity, and spare respiratory capacity, with conspicuous swelling of the mitochondrial matrix and loss of their cristae. Globally, tedizolid was a more potent inhibitor than linezolid. For both drugs, all effects were quickly (48 to 72 h) and fully reversible upon drug withdrawal. Using an alternation of exposure to and withdrawal from drug mimicking their approved schedule of administration (twice daily and once daily [qD] for linezolid and tedizolid, respectively), only partial inhibition of CYTox I expression was noted for up to 96 h. Thus, rapid reversal of toxic effects upon discontinuous administration may mitigate oxazolidinone toxicity. Since tedizolid is given qD, this may help to explain its reported lower preclinical and clinical toxicity.
利奈唑胺是第一种临床可用的恶唑烷酮类抗生素,由于其对线粒体蛋白合成的损害和随后的线粒体功能障碍,引起潜在的严重毒性(骨髓抑制、乳酸酸中毒和神经病变)。替加环素是一种新批准的恶唑烷酮类药物,与利奈唑胺相比具有增强的活性,但也是一种更有效的线粒体蛋白合成抑制剂。我们比较了利奈唑胺和替加环素在以下方面的作用:(i)细胞色素 c 氧化酶亚基 I(CYTox I;Western blot 分析)表达的抑制作用,(ii)细胞色素 c 氧化酶活性(生化测定),(iii)线粒体氧化代谢( Seahorse 技术),以及(iv)暴露于微生物学(针对 modal MIC 的倍数)和治疗(-)相关浓度的 HL-60 早幼粒细胞和 THP-1 单核细胞中线粒体超微结构的改变(电子显微镜)。两种药物均能迅速且完全(48 至 72 小时)抑制 CYTox I 表达、细胞色素 c 氧化酶活性和备用呼吸能力,线粒体基质明显肿胀,嵴丢失。总体而言,替加环素比利奈唑胺更有效。对于这两种药物,停药后所有作用均迅速(48 至 72 小时)且完全逆转。通过交替暴露于药物和停止使用药物来模拟其批准的给药方案(利奈唑胺和替加环素分别为每天两次和每天一次[qD]),最多 96 小时内仅观察到 CYTox I 表达的部分抑制。因此,在不连续给药时迅速逆转毒性作用可能会减轻恶唑烷酮类药物的毒性。由于替加环素每天给药一次,这可能有助于解释其报道的较低的临床前和临床毒性。