• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

男性患者腹腔镜及机器人辅助保留神经根治性膀胱切除术的现状

Current status of laparoscopic and robot-assisted nerve-sparing radical cystectomy in male patients.

作者信息

Huang Jian, Fan Xinxiang, Dong Wen

机构信息

Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

Asian J Urol. 2016 Jul;3(3):150-155. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2016.04.004. Epub 2016 May 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajur.2016.04.004
PMID:29264183
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5730824/
Abstract

During radical cystectomy (RC), the neurovascular bundles are easily removed or damaged, leading to varying rates of incontinence and erectile dysfunction. The nerve-sparing technique was developed to preserve urinary and erectile function. The adoption of laparoscopic and robot-assisted technology has improved visualization and dexterity of pelvic surgeries, thus facilitate the nerve-sparing technique. Although nerve-sparing RC is technically similar with nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy, there are still some anatomical differences. There are mainly three different types of nerve-sparing techniques. Pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) is another important factor to influence erectile function and urinary continence. Nerve-sparing laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC) and robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) may be an optimal treatment choice in well-selected younger patients with low-volume, organ-confined disease. We should attempt to do, whenever possible, a nerve-sparing cystectomy at least on oneside. However, due to the need of a well-refined surgical technique, nerve-sparing LRC and RARC is now being performed only by experienced urological surgeons.

摘要

在根治性膀胱切除术(RC)过程中,神经血管束很容易被切除或损伤,从而导致不同程度的尿失禁和勃起功能障碍。保留神经技术的发展旨在保留排尿和勃起功能。腹腔镜和机器人辅助技术的应用改善了盆腔手术的视野和灵活性,从而促进了保留神经技术的开展。尽管保留神经的RC在技术上与保留神经的根治性前列腺切除术相似,但仍存在一些解剖学差异。主要有三种不同类型的保留神经技术。盆腔淋巴结清扫术(PLND)是影响勃起功能和尿失禁的另一个重要因素。保留神经的腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术(LRC)和机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术(RARC)可能是精心挑选的、低体积、局限于器官疾病的年轻患者的最佳治疗选择。只要有可能,我们应尝试至少在一侧进行保留神经的膀胱切除术。然而,由于需要精湛的手术技术,目前只有经验丰富的泌尿外科医生才能开展保留神经的LRC和RARC。

相似文献

1
Current status of laparoscopic and robot-assisted nerve-sparing radical cystectomy in male patients.男性患者腹腔镜及机器人辅助保留神经根治性膀胱切除术的现状
Asian J Urol. 2016 Jul;3(3):150-155. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2016.04.004. Epub 2016 May 27.
2
Comparing Open Radical Cystectomy and Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.开放性根治性膀胱切除术与机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术的比较:一项随机临床试验。
Eur Urol. 2015 Jun;67(6):1042-1050. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.11.043. Epub 2014 Dec 8.
3
Systematic review and cumulative analysis of oncologic and functional outcomes after robot-assisted radical cystectomy.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术的肿瘤学和功能结局的系统评价和累积分析。
Eur Urol. 2015 Mar;67(3):402-22. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.12.008. Epub 2015 Jan 2.
4
Robot-assisted nerve-sparing radical cystectomy with bilateral extended pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) and intracorporeal urinary diversion for bladder cancer: initial experience in 27 cases.机器人辅助保留神经的根治性膀胱切除术联合双侧扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫术(PLND)和膀胱内尿流改道术治疗膀胱癌:27 例初步经验。
BJU Int. 2012 Aug;110(3):434-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10794.x. Epub 2011 Dec 16.
5
Lower Detrusor Apron-sparing Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy and Intracorporeal Neobladder Reconstruction: Technique and Preliminary Outcomes.低膀胱颈围裙保留机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术和体内新膀胱重建:技术和初步结果。
Eur Urol Focus. 2023 Sep;9(5):760-764. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.03.006. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
6
[Nerve-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy: Clinical application and effect].保留神经的机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术:临床应用及效果
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue. 2019 Sep;25(9):797-801.
7
Oncologic outcomes of patients with incidental prostate cancer who underwent RARC: a comparison between nerve sparing and non-nerve sparing approach.接受 RARC 的偶然前列腺癌患者的肿瘤学结果:保留神经与非保留神经方法的比较。
J Robot Surg. 2021 Feb;15(1):105-114. doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01081-8. Epub 2020 May 4.
8
Comparative effectiveness of open, laparoscopic and robot-assisted radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.开放性、腹腔镜及机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术治疗膀胱癌的比较效果:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2020 Jun;72(3):251-264. doi: 10.23736/S0393-2249.20.03680-2. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
9
Robot-assisted radical cystectomy: description of an evolved approach to radical cystectomy.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术:根治性膀胱切除术改良方法的描述。
Eur Urol. 2013 Oct;64(4):654-63. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.05.020. Epub 2013 May 27.
10
Systematic review and cumulative analysis of perioperative outcomes and complications after robot-assisted radical cystectomy.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术围手术期结局和并发症的系统评价和累积分析。
Eur Urol. 2015 Mar;67(3):376-401. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.12.007. Epub 2015 Jan 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Recent advances in oncological endourology.肿瘤腔内泌尿外科的最新进展。
Asian J Urol. 2016 Jul;3(3):113-114. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2016.05.005. Epub 2016 Jun 4.

本文引用的文献

1
A Critical Analysis of the Current Knowledge of Surgical Anatomy of the Prostate Related to Optimisation of Cancer Control and Preservation of Continence and Erection in Candidates for Radical Prostatectomy: An Update.前列腺根治性切除术候选人中与癌症控制、控尿和勃起功能保护相关的前列腺外科解剖学知识的最新分析:更新。
Eur Urol. 2016 Aug;70(2):301-11. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.01.026. Epub 2016 Feb 2.
2
Fifteen-year single-centre experience with three different surgical procedures of nerve-sparing cystectomy in selected organ-confined bladder cancer patients.在特定的器官局限性膀胱癌患者中,对三种不同的保留神经膀胱切除术手术方法进行的15年单中心经验总结。
World J Urol. 2015 Oct;33(10):1389-95. doi: 10.1007/s00345-015-1482-y. Epub 2015 Jan 11.
3
Prostate capsule sparing versus nerve sparing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: results of a randomized, controlled trial.保留前列腺包膜与保留神经的根治性膀胱切除术治疗膀胱癌:一项随机对照试验的结果
J Urol. 2015 Jan;193(1):64-70. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.07.090. Epub 2014 Jul 24.
4
The effect of nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical cystoprostatectomy on erectile function in a preoperatively potent population.保留神经的机器人辅助根治性膀胱前列腺切除术对术前性功能正常人群勃起功能的影响。
J Endourol. 2014 Nov;28(11):1352-6. doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0315. Epub 2014 Aug 20.
5
A prospective randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic vs open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: perioperative and oncologic outcomes with 5-year follow-upT Lin et al.腹腔镜与开放性根治性膀胱切除术治疗膀胱癌的前瞻性随机对照试验:5 年随访的围手术期和肿瘤学结果 T Lin 等人
Br J Cancer. 2014 Feb 18;110(4):842-9. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.777. Epub 2014 Jan 9.
6
Extended vs non-extended pelvic lymph node dissection and their influence on recurrence-free survival in patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.根治性膀胱切除术治疗膀胱癌患者中扩展与非扩展盆腔淋巴结清扫术及其对无复发生存率的影响:系统评价和比较研究的荟萃分析。
BJU Int. 2014 May;113(5b):E39-48. doi: 10.1111/bju.12371.
7
Robot-assisted radical cystectomy: description of an evolved approach to radical cystectomy.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术:根治性膀胱切除术改良方法的描述。
Eur Urol. 2013 Oct;64(4):654-63. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.05.020. Epub 2013 May 27.
8
Perioperative outcomes and oncologic efficacy from a pilot prospective randomized clinical trial of open versus robotic assisted radical cystectomy.一项开放手术与机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术的前瞻性随机临床试验的围手术期结果和肿瘤学疗效。
J Urol. 2013 Feb;189(2):474-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.09.077. Epub 2012 Sep 24.
9
Robot-assisted nerve-sparing radical cystectomy with bilateral extended pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) and intracorporeal urinary diversion for bladder cancer: initial experience in 27 cases.机器人辅助保留神经的根治性膀胱切除术联合双侧扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫术(PLND)和膀胱内尿流改道术治疗膀胱癌:27 例初步经验。
BJU Int. 2012 Aug;110(3):434-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10794.x. Epub 2011 Dec 16.
10
Super extended versus extended pelvic lymph node dissection in patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: a comparative study.根治性膀胱切除术治疗膀胱癌患者中超级广泛与广泛盆腔淋巴结清扫术的比较研究。
J Urol. 2011 Oct;186(4):1261-8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.06.004. Epub 2011 Aug 17.