Zaki M N, Lusk L A, Overcash R T, Rao R, Truong Y N, Liebowitz M, Porto M
Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA, USA.
Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
J Perinatol. 2018 Feb;38(2):122-126. doi: 10.1038/jp.2017.171. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
To determine the accuracy of commonly utilized ultrasound formulas for estimating birth weight (BW) in fetuses with gastroschisis.
A retrospective review was conducted of all inborn pregnancies with gastroschisis within the five institutions of the University of California Fetal Consortium (UCfC) between 2007 and 2012. Infants delivered at ⩾28 weeks who had an ultrasound within 21 days before delivery were included. Prediction of BW was evaluated for each of the five ultrasound formulas: Hadlock 1 (abdominal circumference (AC), biparietal diameter (BPD), femur length (FL) and head circumference (HC)) and Hadlock 2 (AC, BPD and FL), Shepard (AC and BPD), Honarvar (FL) and Siemer (BPD, occipitofrontal diameter (OFD), and FL) using Pearson's correlation, mean difference and percent error and Bland-Altman analysis. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) for the ultrasound diagnosis of intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) were assessed.
We identified 191 neonates born with gastroschisis within the UCfC, with 111 neonates meeting the inclusion criteria. The mean gestational age at delivery was 36.3±1.7 weeks and the mean BW was 2448±460 g. Hadlock (1) formula was found to have the best correlation (r=0.81), the lowest mean difference (8±306 g) and the lowest mean percent error (1.4±13%). The Honarvar and Siemer formulas performed significantly worse when compared with Hadlock 1, with a 13.7% (P<0.001) and 3.9% (P=0.03) difference, respectively, between estimated and actual BW. This was supported by Bland-Altman plots. For Hadlock 1 and 2, sensitivity was 80% with a NPV of 91%.
The widely used Hadlock (1) and (2) formulas provided the best estimated BW in infants with gastroschisis despite its inclusion of abdominal circumference. Furthermore, this formula performs well with diagnosis of IUGR.
确定常用超声公式在估计腹裂胎儿出生体重(BW)方面的准确性。
对2007年至2012年加利福尼亚大学胎儿联盟(UCfC)五个机构内所有腹裂活产妊娠进行回顾性研究。纳入孕周≥28周且在分娩前21天内接受过超声检查的婴儿。使用Pearson相关性、平均差异、百分比误差和Bland-Altman分析,对以下五个超声公式预测BW的情况进行评估:Hadlock 1(腹围(AC)、双顶径(BPD)、股骨长度(FL)和头围(HC))、Hadlock 2(AC、BPD和FL)、Shepard(AC和BPD)、Honarvar(FL)以及Siemer(BPD、枕额径(OFD)和FL)。评估超声诊断胎儿宫内生长受限(IUGR)的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)。
我们在UCfC中确定了191例腹裂新生儿,其中111例符合纳入标准。分娩时的平均孕周为36.3±1.7周,平均BW为2448±460g。发现Hadlock(1)公式具有最佳相关性(r = 0.81)、最低平均差异(8±306g)和最低平均百分比误差(1.4±13%)。与Hadlock 1相比,Honarvar和Siemer公式的表现明显更差,估计BW与实际BW之间的差异分别为13.7%(P < 0.001)和3.9%(P = 0.03)。Bland-Altman图支持了这一结果。对于Hadlock 1和2,敏感性为80%,NPV为91%。
尽管Hadlock(1)和(2)公式纳入了腹围,但在腹裂婴儿中,它们提供了最佳的估计BW。此外,该公式在IUGR诊断中表现良好。