Suppr超能文献

股骨长度的纳入会导致不对称性早产生长受限胎儿体重的低估。

Incorporation of femur length leads to underestimation of fetal weight in asymmetric preterm growth restriction.

机构信息

Maternal-Fetal Medicine Division, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Apr;35(4):442-8. doi: 10.1002/uog.7605.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To review the performance of a variety of biometry formulae for estimated fetal weight (EFW) in the management of severely growth restricted fetuses with abnormal umbilical artery Doppler at a single perinatal institution.

METHODS

Forty-three pregnancies were retrospectively reviewed. Inclusion criteria were: chromosomally/ structurally normal fetus; complete ultrasound biometry at < or = 7 days from delivery; EFW < 10(th) centile; absent/reversed end-diastolic flow in the umbilical arteries; and delivery at < 32 + 6 weeks. EFW accuracy and precision were compared among nine formulae utilizing combinations of head circumference (HC), biparietal diameter (BPD), abdominal circumference (AC) and femur length (FL) measurements.

RESULTS

Twenty-six (60.5%) fetuses showed asymmetric growth (HC/AC ratio > 95(th) centile). Analysis of the systematic and random errors associated with each formula showed that the birth weight of asymmetrically-grown fetuses was most closely approximated by the Hadlock equation that utilized BPD and AC measurements only. The birth weight of symmetrically-grown fetuses was most closely approximated by EFW derived from Hadlock equations that utilized > or = three biometry measurements, including FL. Incorporation of FL into Hadlock formulae led to significant underestimation of birth weight in the fetuses with asymmetric growth (mean percentage error +/- SD: EFW(FL-AC), -13.3 +/- 9.8%; EFW(BPD-FL-AC), -10.8 +/- 9.8%; EFW(HC-FL-AC), -11.8 +/- 9.3%; EFW(BPD-HC-FL-AC), -11.7 +/- 9.5%; P < 0.001). The same equations were accurate in fetuses with symmetric growth (EFW(FL-AC), 3.1 +/- 10.0%; EFW(BPD-FL-AC), 1.0 +/- 8.9%; EFW(HC-FL-AC), 0.3 +/- 8.7%; EFW(BPD-HC-FL-AC), 0.4 +/- 15.5%). Use of the best performing equation (Hadlock 3), which does not include FL, to estimate weight in asymmetrically-grown fetuses over 28 weeks' gestation, would have reduced the proportion of those with an underestimation of fetal weight of > 100 g from nine (50.0%) to three (16.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Biometry methods that exclude FL should be considered in asymmetric intrauterine growth restriction associated with abnormal umbilical artery Doppler waveforms.

摘要

目的

回顾在单一围产机构中,对存在异常脐动脉多普勒的严重生长受限胎儿,使用多种生物测量公式估算胎儿体重(EFW)的表现。

方法

回顾性分析了 43 例妊娠。纳入标准为:染色体/结构正常胎儿;分娩前 7 天内完成完整超声生物测量;EFW<第 10 百分位数;脐动脉舒张末期血流缺失/逆转;妊娠<32+6 周。使用头围(HC)、双顶径(BPD)、腹围(AC)和股骨长(FL)测量值的 9 种公式组合比较了 EFW 的准确性和精密度。

结果

26 例(60.5%)胎儿表现为不对称生长(HC/AC 比值>第 95 百分位数)。对每个公式相关的系统和随机误差的分析表明,仅使用 BPD 和 AC 测量值的 Hadlock 公式最接近估算出不对称生长胎儿的出生体重。对称生长胎儿的出生体重最接近使用>或=3 项生物测量值(包括 FL)的 Hadlock 公式估算出的 EFW。在不对称生长的胎儿中,将 FL 纳入 Hadlock 公式会导致出生体重显著低估(平均百分比误差+/-SD:EFW(FL-AC),-13.3+/-9.8%;EFW(BPD-FL-AC),-10.8+/-9.8%;EFW(HC-FL-AC),-11.8+/-9.3%;EFW(BPD-HC-FL-AC),-11.7+/-9.5%;P<0.001)。在对称生长的胎儿中,相同的公式是准确的(EFW(FL-AC),3.1+/-10.0%;EFW(BPD-FL-AC),1.0+/-8.9%;EFW(HC-FL-AC),0.3+/-8.7%;EFW(BPD-HC-FL-AC),0.4+/-15.5%)。在 28 周以上妊娠的不对称生长胎儿中,使用不包括 FL 的最佳表现公式(Hadlock 3)来估算体重,会将出生体重低估>100 克的比例从 9 例(50.0%)降低到 3 例(16.7%)。

结论

对于与异常脐动脉多普勒相关的不对称宫内生长受限,应考虑排除 FL 的生物测量方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验