Carver C S, Scheier M F, Weintraub J K
Department of Psychology, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida 33124.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1989 Feb;56(2):267-83. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.56.2.267.
We developed a multidimensional coping inventory to assess the different ways in which people respond to stress. Five scales (of four items each) measure conceptually distinct aspects of problem-focused coping (active coping, planning, suppression of competing activities, restraint coping, seeking of instrumental social support); five scales measure aspects of what might be viewed as emotional-focused coping (seeking of emotional social support, positive reinterpretation, acceptance, denial, turning to religion); and three scales measure coping responses that arguably are less useful (focus on and venting of emotions, behavioral disengagement, mental disengagement). Study 1 reports the development of scale items. Study 2 reports correlations between the various coping scales and several theoretically relevant personality measures in an effort to provide preliminary information about the inventory's convergent and discriminant validity. Study 3 uses the inventory to assess coping responses among a group of undergraduates who were attempting to cope with a specific stressful episode. This study also allowed an initial examination of associations between dispositional and situational coping tendencies.
我们开发了一种多维应对量表,以评估人们应对压力的不同方式。五个分量表(每个分量表包含四个项目)从概念上测量问题聚焦应对的不同方面(积极应对、计划、抑制竞争性活动、克制应对、寻求工具性社会支持);五个分量表测量可被视为情绪聚焦应对的方面(寻求情感性社会支持、积极重新诠释、接受、否认、求助宗教);三个分量表测量可论证为不太有用的应对反应(关注并宣泄情绪、行为脱离、心理脱离)。研究1报告了量表项目的开发情况。研究2报告了各种应对分量表与几种理论上相关的人格测量之间的相关性,以便为该量表的聚合效度和区分效度提供初步信息。研究3使用该量表评估一组试图应对特定压力事件的本科生的应对反应。这项研究还初步考察了特质性和情境性应对倾向之间的关联。