Eisel Maximilian, Ströbl Stephan, Pongratz Thomas, Strittmatter Frank, Sroka Ronald
Laser-Forschungslabor, LIFE-Zentrum, University Hospital of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Department of Urology, University Hospital of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Lasers Surg Med. 2018 Apr;50(4):333-339. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22770. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
Ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy is an important and widely used method for destroying ureter stones. It represents an alternative to ultrasonic and pneumatic lithotripsy techniques. Although these techniques have been thoroughly investigated, the influence of some physical parameters that may be relevant to further improve the treatment results is not fully understood. One crucial topic is the propulsive stone movement induced by the applied laser pulses. To simplify and speed up the optimization of laser parameters in this regard, a video tracking method was developed in connection with a vertical column setup that allows recording and subsequently analyzing the propulsive stone movement in dependence of different laser parameters in a particularly convenient and fast manner.
Pulsed laser light was applied from below to a cubic BegoStone phantom loosely guided within a vertical column setup. The video tracking method uses an algorithm to determine the vertical stone position in each frame of the recorded scene. The time-dependence of the vertical stone position is characterized by an irregular series of peaks. By analyzing the slopes of the peaks in this signal it was possible to determine the mean upward stone velocity for a whole pulse train and to compare it for different laser settings. For a proof of principle of the video tracking method, a specific pulse energy setting (1 J/pulse) was used in combination with three different pulse durations: short pulse (0.3 ms), medium pulse (0.6 ms), and long pulse (1.0 ms). The three pulse durations were compared in terms of their influence on the propulsive stone movement in terms of upward velocity. Furthermore, the propulsions induced by two different pulse energy settings (0.8 J/pulse and 1.2 J/pulse) for a fixed pulse duration (0.3 ms) were compared. A pulse repetition rate of 10 Hz was chosen for all experiments, and for each laser setting, the experiment was repeated on 15 different freshly prepared stones. The latter set of experiments was compared with the results of previous propulsion measurements performed with a pendulum setup.
For a fixed pulse energy (1 J/pulse), the mean upward propulsion velocity increased (from 120.0 to 154.9 mm · s ) with decreasing pulse duration. For fixed pulse duration (0.3 ms), the mean upward propulsion velocity increased (from 91.9 to 123.3 mm · s ) with increasing pulse energy (0.8 J/pulse and 1.2 J/pulse). The latter result corresponds roughly to the one obtained with the pendulum setup (increase from 61 to 105 mm · s ). While the mean propulsion velocities for the two different pulse energies were found to differ significantly (P < 0.001) for the two experimental and analysis methods, the standard deviations of the measured mean propulsion velocities were considerably smaller in case of the vertical column method with video tracking (12% and 15% for n = 15 freshly prepared stones) than in case of the pendulum method (26% and 41% for n = 50 freshly prepared stones), in spite of the considerably smaller number of experiment repetitions ("sample size") in the first case.
The proposed vertical column method with video tracking appears advantageous compared to the pendulum method in terms of the statistical significance of the obtained results. This may partly be understood by the fact that the entire motion of the stones contributes to the data analysis, rather than just their maximum distance from the initial position. The key difference is, however, that the pendulum method involves only one single laser pulse in each experiment run, which renders this method rather tedious to perform. Furthermore, the video tracking method appears much better suited to model a clinical lithotripsy intervention that utilizes longer series of laser pulses at higher repetition rates. The proposed video tracking method can conveniently and quickly deliver results for a large number of laser pulses that can easily be averaged. An optimization of laser settings to achieve minimal propulsive stone movement should thus be more easily feasible with the video tracking method in connection with the vertical column setup. Lasers Surg. Med. 50:333-339, 2018. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
输尿管镜激光碎石术是一种重要且广泛应用于输尿管结石治疗的方法,它是超声和气压弹道碎石技术的替代方案。尽管这些技术已得到充分研究,但一些可能与进一步改善治疗效果相关的物理参数的影响尚未完全明确。一个关键问题是所施加的激光脉冲引起的结石推进运动。为了在这方面简化并加速激光参数的优化,结合垂直柱装置开发了一种视频跟踪方法,该方法能够以特别便捷和快速的方式记录并随后分析不同激光参数下的结石推进运动。
脉冲激光从下方照射到松散放置在垂直柱装置内的立方体形BegoStone模型上。视频跟踪方法使用一种算法来确定记录场景每一帧中结石的垂直位置。结石垂直位置的时间依赖性由一系列不规则的峰值表征。通过分析该信号中峰值的斜率,可以确定整个脉冲序列的结石平均向上速度,并针对不同激光设置进行比较。为了验证视频跟踪方法的原理,使用了特定的脉冲能量设置(1焦耳/脉冲)并结合三种不同的脉冲持续时间:短脉冲(0.3毫秒)、中脉冲(0.6毫秒)和长脉冲(1.0毫秒)。比较了这三种脉冲持续时间对结石向上推进运动速度的影响。此外,还比较了固定脉冲持续时间(0.3毫秒)下两种不同脉冲能量设置(0.8焦耳/脉冲和1.2焦耳/脉冲)引起的推进情况。所有实验均选择10赫兹的脉冲重复频率,并且对于每种激光设置,在15块不同的新制备结石上重复实验。后一组实验与先前使用摆式装置进行的推进测量结果进行了比较。
对于固定的脉冲能量(1焦耳/脉冲),平均向上推进速度随着脉冲持续时间的缩短而增加(从120.0毫米·秒增加到154.9毫米·秒)。对于固定的脉冲持续时间(0.3毫秒),平均向上推进速度随着脉冲能量的增加(0.8焦耳/脉冲和1.2焦耳/脉冲)而增加(从91.9毫米·秒增加到123.3毫米·秒)。后一结果大致与使用摆式装置获得的结果相符(从61毫米·秒增加到105毫米·秒)。虽然两种实验和分析方法下两种不同脉冲能量的平均推进速度差异显著(P < 0.001),但与摆式方法相比,采用视频跟踪的垂直柱方法测量的平均推进速度的标准偏差要小得多(对于n = 15块新制备结石,分别为12%和15%),而摆式方法(对于n = 50块新制备结石,分别为26%和41%),尽管第一种情况下实验重复次数(“样本量”)要少得多。
就所得结果的统计学意义而言,所提出的带有视频跟踪的垂直柱方法相比摆式方法似乎更具优势。部分原因可能是结石的整个运动都有助于数据分析,而不仅仅是它们距初始位置的最大距离。然而,关键区别在于摆式方法在每次实验运行中仅涉及单个激光脉冲,这使得该方法执行起来相当繁琐。此外,视频跟踪方法似乎更适合模拟临床碎石干预,该干预使用更高重复频率的更长激光脉冲序列。所提出的视频跟踪方法可以方便快捷地为大量激光脉冲提供结果,这些结果易于求平均值。因此,结合垂直柱装置使用视频跟踪方法更容易实现激光设置的优化,以实现最小的结石推进运动。《激光外科与医学》50:333 - 339, 2018。© 2017威利期刊公司