Japanese Red Cross Hokkaido College of Nursing, Kitami, Hokkaido, Japan.
Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
J Clin Nurs. 2018 Mar;27(5-6):e1225-e1232. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14225. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
To determine whether nurses can accurately assess the skin colour of replanted fingers displayed as digital images on a computer screen.
Colour measurement and clinical diagnostic methods for medical digital images have been studied, but reproducing skin colour on a computer screen remains difficult.
The inter-rater reliability of skin colour assessment scores was evaluated. In May 2014, 21 nurses who worked on a trauma ward in Japan participated in testing.
Six digital images with different skin colours were used. Colours were scored from both digital images and direct patient's observation. The score from a digital image was defined as the test score, and its difference from the direct assessment score as the difference score. Intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated. Nurses' opinions were classified and summarised.
The intraclass correlation coefficients for the test scores were fair. Although the intraclass correlation coefficients for the difference scores were poor, they improved to good when three images that might have contributed to poor reliability were excluded. Most nurses stated that it is difficult to assess skin colour in digital images; they did not think it could be a substitute for direct visual assessment. However, most nurses were in favour of including images in nursing progress notes.
Although the inter-rater reliability was fairly high, the reliability of colour reproduction in digital images as indicated by the difference scores was poor. Nevertheless, nurses expect the incorporation of digital images in nursing progress notes to be useful. This gap between the reliability of digital colour reproduction and nurses' expectations towards it must be addressed.
High inter-rater reliability for digital images in nursing progress notes was not observed. Assessments of future improvements in colour reproduction technologies are required.
Further digitisation and visualisation of nursing records might pose challenges.
确定护士是否能够准确评估在计算机屏幕上显示的数字图像中再植手指的肤色。
已经研究了医疗数字图像的颜色测量和临床诊断方法,但在计算机屏幕上再现肤色仍然很困难。
评估了肤色评估得分的组内可靠性。2014 年 5 月,日本创伤病房的 21 名护士参与了测试。
使用了六个具有不同肤色的数字图像。从数字图像和直接观察患者两个方面对颜色进行评分。数字图像的评分定义为测试分数,其与直接评估分数的差值定义为差值分数。计算了组内相关系数。对护士的意见进行了分类和总结。
测试分数的组内相关系数为中等。虽然差值分数的组内相关系数较差,但当排除三个可能导致可靠性较差的图像时,其提高到了良好。大多数护士表示,在数字图像中评估肤色很困难;他们认为这不能替代直接目视评估。然而,大多数护士赞成在护理进展记录中包含图像。
尽管组内可靠性相当高,但数字图像中颜色再现的可靠性(由差值分数表示)较差。尽管如此,护士期望将数字图像纳入护理进展记录中是有用的。数字颜色再现的可靠性和护士对其的期望之间的这种差距必须得到解决。
在护理进展记录的数字图像中没有观察到高组内可靠性。需要评估未来颜色再现技术的改进。
进一步对护理记录进行数字化和可视化可能会带来挑战。