Tanaka Hiromasa, Nakagami Gojiro, Sanada Hiromi, Sari Yunita, Kobayashi Hiroshi, Kishi Kazuo, Konya Chizuko, Tadaka Etsuko
Department of Gerontological Nursing/Wound Care Management, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Skin Res Technol. 2008 May;14(2):192-200. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0846.2007.00278.x.
The evaluation of the skin state when it is healthy at the time of examination, but predisposed to disease, is based solely on the subjective assessment of clinicians. This assessment may vary from moment to moment and from rater to rater.
We focused on skin texture and aimed to develop a new method to evaluate skin integrity of the elderly using a digital skin image, by verifying the reliability of the clinical evaluation of elderly skin image by specialists to create a 'gold standard,' and by analyzing a digital skin image to identify the indices that explain the skin condition as evaluated by specialists.
A total of 208 skin images were collected from 34 subjects. And then we processed and analyzed images. Modified Kobayashi's method and texture analysis method were used in image analysis. Kobayashi's method included the process of density transformation, cross binarization, short straight line matching and extraction of main sulcus, and calculation of each index. Texture analysis was performed on cross-binarized images for quantification of uniformity. On the other hand, skin textures in images were scored by six plastic surgeons, using a 10-point Likert scale, where 1 represented 'very bad regularity' and 10 represented 'very good regularity.' The inter-rater reliability was verified by means of the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Finally, stepwise multiple regression analysis was used to extract useful indices; where the clinical evaluation of the physicians (gold standard) was considered to be a dependent variable, and indices obtained from digital skin image analysis to be independent variables.
The ICC of raters was 0.92 (95% confidence interval; 0.91-0.94) when including all raters, therefore the score of all raters was used. As a result of stepwise multiple regression, the index of interval (L), thickness (T(ave)), energy 0 degrees , and entropy 45 degrees independently explained the clinician evaluation. R(2) in multiple regression equation was 0.59.
It is shown that quantitative evaluation using skin images and their analysis is one method of determining skin integrity in the elderly. The indices to explain the clinical evaluation of specialists were defined and these indices were obtained simply by using a skin image.
对检查时皮肤健康但易患疾病的皮肤状态评估,完全基于临床医生的主观判断。这种评估可能因时而异,也因人而异。
我们聚焦于皮肤纹理,旨在开发一种新方法,通过验证专家对老年皮肤图像临床评估的可靠性以创建“金标准”,并通过分析数字皮肤图像来识别解释专家所评估皮肤状况的指标,从而利用数字皮肤图像评估老年人的皮肤完整性。
从34名受试者收集了总共208张皮肤图像。然后我们对图像进行处理和分析。图像分析采用改良小林方法和纹理分析方法。小林方法包括密度变换、交叉二值化、短直线匹配及主沟提取过程,以及各指标计算。对交叉二值化图像进行纹理分析以量化均匀性。另一方面,六名整形外科医生使用10分制李克特量表对图像中的皮肤纹理进行评分,其中1表示“规律性非常差”,10表示“规律性非常好”。通过组内相关系数(ICC)验证评分者间信度。最后,采用逐步多元回归分析提取有用指标;将医生的临床评估(金标准)视为因变量,将从数字皮肤图像分析获得的指标视为自变量。
纳入所有评分者时,评分者的ICC为0.92(95%置信区间:0.91 - 0.94),因此采用所有评分者的分数。逐步多元回归结果显示,间距指数(L)、厚度(T(ave))、0度能量和45度熵独立解释了临床医生的评估。多元回归方程中的R(2)为0.59。
结果表明,利用皮肤图像及其分析进行定量评估是确定老年人皮肤完整性的一种方法。定义了解释专家临床评估的指标,这些指标可简单通过使用皮肤图像获得。