• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

妊娠神经病学中的伦理问题。

Ethical Issues in the Neurology of Pregnancy.

作者信息

Cochrane Thomas I

机构信息

Division of Neuroethics, Department of Neurology, Center for Bioethics, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

Semin Neurol. 2017 Dec;37(6):724-728. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1607311. Epub 2017 Dec 21.

DOI:10.1055/s-0037-1607311
PMID:29270946
Abstract

Decision making for pregnant women and fetuses who suffer brain injuries is emotionally difficult and conceptually challenging. Occasionally, both the pregnant woman and the fetus have suffered an injury that confers a poor neurological prognosis, and decisions about one of them will have implications for the other-making the process of decision making even more problematic. In this article, decision-making standards and principles are reviewed for both pregnant women and fetuses, using a real case from the author's institution. Practical suggestions are made regarding deliberative processes and consultative models that can help with these difficult cases.

摘要

为脑损伤的孕妇和胎儿做决策在情感上是困难的,在概念上也具有挑战性。偶尔,孕妇和胎儿都受到了损伤,导致神经预后不良,而关于其中一方的决策会对另一方产生影响,这使得决策过程更加棘手。在本文中,通过作者所在机构的一个真实案例,对孕妇和胎儿的决策标准及原则进行了综述。针对有助于处理这些棘手案例的审议过程和咨询模式提出了实用建议。

相似文献

1
Ethical Issues in the Neurology of Pregnancy.妊娠神经病学中的伦理问题。
Semin Neurol. 2017 Dec;37(6):724-728. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1607311. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
2
Medical, legal, and ethical challenges associated with pregnancy and catastrophic brain injury.与妊娠及灾难性脑损伤相关的医学、法律和伦理挑战。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015 Jun;129(3):276-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.12.011. Epub 2015 Mar 3.
3
From the dead to the unborn: is there an ethical duty to save life?从逝者到未出生者:拯救生命是否存在道德义务?
Med Law. 2004;23(3):567-85.
4
Withdrawing Life Support in Pregnancy: State Laws and Implications for Ethics.孕期撤除生命维持治疗:州法律及其伦理影响
Am J Bioeth. 2017 Jul;17(7):75-76. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2017.1314708.
5
Clinicians and the right to decide on withdrawal of treatment.临床医生与决定停止治疗的权利。
BMJ. 2017 Jan 6;356:j15. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j15.
6
Ethical challenges in pregnant women with brain injury.脑损伤孕妇面临的伦理挑战。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018 Sep;31(17):2340-2341. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1339271. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
7
Law Is Not Enough: The Importance of Ethics Consultation in Complex Cases.法律并不足够:复杂病例中伦理咨询的重要性。
Am J Bioeth. 2017 Jul;17(7):79-80. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2017.1314055.
8
Ethical Issues in Maternal-Fetal Care Emergencies.母婴护理紧急情况中的伦理问题。
Crit Care Clin. 2016 Jan;32(1):137-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2015.08.007. Epub 2015 Oct 19.
9
Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Treatments in Perceived Devastating Brain Injury: The Key Role of Uncertainty.预期性严重脑损伤患者的生命支持治疗撤停:不确定性的关键作用。
Neurocrit Care. 2019 Feb;30(1):33-41. doi: 10.1007/s12028-018-0595-8.
10
Life-sustaining treatment decisions in pediatric intensive care: an Italian survey on ethical concerns.儿科重症监护中的生命支持治疗决策:意大利关于伦理问题的调查。
Ital J Pediatr. 2021 Jul 7;47(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s13052-021-01054-z.