Suppr超能文献

《规范临床现实:青年人群酒精和其他药物治疗中的争议与多样性》

Ordering clinical realities: Controversy and multiplicity in alcohol and other drug treatment for young adults.

机构信息

Social Studies of Addiction Concepts Research Program, National Drug Research Institute (Melbourne office), Suite 6/19-35 Gertrude St, Fitzroy Vic 3065, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Drug Policy. 2018 Feb;52:79-86. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.11.012. Epub 2017 Dec 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although young adults receiving treatment for alcohol and other drug (AOD) use often experience disadvantaged life circumstances, there has been little qualitative research into how treatment agencies understand and respond to intersections between these life circumstances and the AOD use of their clients.

METHODS

This article draws on analytic techniques from science and technology studies to detail how treatment clinicians become sensitive to client life circumstances; how therapeutic plans of action are formed; and how clients respond to these processes. Ethnographic data were gathered through interviews with clinicians and agency staff, documentary analysis and field observations in a public AOD clinic treating young adults in Melbourne, Australia.

RESULTS

Findings detail emerging controversies concerning dependence, dosage, mental health and AOD comorbidities, forensic treatment, and resumption of use after treatment.

CONCLUSION

I argue that each controversy can be understood as a contest between aggregated, humanist and situated modes of ordering clinical phenomena. Aggregated modes of ordering are crafted for coherence at a population level and position AOD use as the primary problem in clients' lives. Humanist modes of ordering foreground clients' poor life circumstances and lack of resources, and frame treatment to address AOD use as benevolent. In situated modes of ordering, the effects of AOD use are transformed by emotional, social and material entanglements and AOD use is no longer necessarily the problem in clients' lives. I conclude that, since clinicians seem to readily abandon aggregated approaches in favour of humanist ones, and humanist modes of ordering are often ineffective insofar as they are politically disempowering and engender client resistance, the scientific task of constructing practice tools for more situated approaches in clinical AOD treatment settings seems to be a priority.

摘要

背景

尽管接受酒精和其他药物(AOD)治疗的年轻人经常经历不利的生活环境,但很少有定性研究探讨治疗机构如何理解和应对这些生活环境与客户 AOD 使用之间的交叉点。

方法

本文借鉴科学和技术研究中的分析技术,详细介绍了治疗临床医生如何对客户的生活环境变得敏感;如何制定治疗行动计划;以及客户如何对这些过程做出反应。在澳大利亚墨尔本的一家治疗年轻人的公共 AOD 诊所,通过与临床医生和机构工作人员的访谈、文件分析和现场观察收集了民族志数据。

结果

研究结果详细介绍了关于依赖、剂量、心理健康和 AOD 共病、法医治疗以及治疗后重新使用等方面出现的争议。

结论

我认为,每一个争议都可以被理解为一种聚合的、人文主义的和情境的临床现象排序模式之间的竞争。聚合排序模式是为了在人群层面上的一致性而构建的,并将 AOD 使用定位为客户生活中的主要问题。人文主义排序模式强调客户糟糕的生活环境和缺乏资源,并将治疗作为解决 AOD 使用问题的一种仁慈方式。在情境排序模式中,AOD 使用的影响被情感、社会和物质的纠缠所改变,AOD 使用不再一定是客户生活中的问题。我的结论是,由于临床医生似乎很容易放弃聚合方法而倾向于人文主义方法,并且人文主义排序模式往往无效,因为它们在政治上剥夺权力并引起客户抵制,因此在临床 AOD 治疗环境中构建更情境化方法的实践工具的科学任务似乎是当务之急。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验