Klaczynski P A, Gelfand H, Reese H W
Mem Cognit. 1989 Mar;17(2):208-20. doi: 10.3758/bf03197070.
Transfer of reasoning on Wason's (1966) selection task was explored in three experiments. Experiment 1 tested the effects of problem explanations and verbalization instructions on transfer from abstract or thematic problems to abstract problems. Explanations facilitated transfer only when the initial problems were abstract; verbalization did not produce transfer between problems. Experiment 2 explored the effects of problem similarity and explanations on transfer between problems. Although transfer occurred following explanations, no effect of similarity was found for thematic problems. In both of these experiments, the thematic effect (Wason & Shapiro, 1971) was observed. Experiment 3 examined the effects of explanations to abstract or thematic problems on transfer to subsequent abstract or thematic problems. Transfer of reasoning occurred from both initial problem types, particularly to problems of the same type; however, transfer occurred to a greater extent from abstract problems than from thematic problems. The results are discussed in terms of problem similarity and Cheng and Holyoak's (1985) pragmatic reasoning schema hypothesis.
在三个实验中探究了在沃森(1966年)选择任务上推理的迁移情况。实验1测试了问题解释和言语化指令对从抽象问题或主题问题向抽象问题迁移的影响。只有当初始问题是抽象问题时,解释才促进迁移;言语化并未在问题之间产生迁移。实验2探究了问题相似性和解释对问题之间迁移的影响。尽管在解释之后出现了迁移,但对于主题问题未发现相似性的影响。在这两个实验中,都观察到了主题效应(沃森和夏皮罗,1971年)。实验3考察了对抽象问题或主题问题的解释对向后续抽象问题或主题问题迁移的影响。推理迁移发生于两种初始问题类型,尤其是向相同类型的问题迁移;然而,从抽象问题发生的迁移比从主题问题发生的迁移程度更大。根据问题相似性以及程和霍利约克(1985年)的语用推理图式假设对结果进行了讨论。