The Economic and Social Research Institute,Whitaker Square,Sir John Rogerson's Quay,Dublin,Ireland.
Health Econ Policy Law. 2019 Jul;14(3):355-373. doi: 10.1017/S1744133117000275. Epub 2017 Dec 26.
The Irish health care system is unusual within Europe in not providing universal, equitable access to either primary or acute hospital care. The majority of the population pays out-of-pocket fees to access primary health care. Due to long waits for public hospital care, many purchase private health insurance, which facilitates faster access to public and private hospital services. The system has been the subject of much criticism and repeated reform attempts. Proposals in 2011 to develop a universal health care system, funded by Universal Health Insurance, were abandoned in 2015 largely due to cost concerns. Despite this experience, there remains strong political support for developing a universal health care system. By applying an historical institutionalist approach, the paper develops an understanding of why Ireland has been a European outlier. The aim of the paper is to identify and discuss issues that may arise in introducing a universal healthcare system to Ireland informed by an understanding of previous unsuccessful reform proposals. Challenges in system design faced by a late-starter country like Ireland, including overcoming stakeholder resistance, achieving clarity in the definition of universality and avoiding barriers to access, may be shared by countries whose universal systems have been compromised in the period of austerity.
爱尔兰的医疗保健系统在欧洲范围内较为独特,因为它没有为初级或急性医院护理提供普遍和平等的机会。大多数人需要自掏腰包才能获得初级医疗保健服务。由于公立医院的等待时间较长,许多人购买了私人医疗保险,这使得他们能够更快地获得公共和私人医院的服务。该系统一直受到广泛批评和多次改革尝试。2011 年,曾提议通过全民医疗保险来建立全民医疗保健系统,但由于成本问题,该提案于 2015 年被放弃。尽管有这样的经历,但仍有强烈的政治支持来发展全民医疗保健系统。本文通过应用历史制度主义方法,了解爱尔兰为何成为欧洲的异类。本文的目的是确定并讨论在爱尔兰引入全民医疗保健系统时可能出现的问题,这些问题是通过了解以前不成功的改革提案而得出的。爱尔兰作为一个起步较晚的国家,在系统设计方面面临挑战,包括克服利益相关者的抵制、明确普遍性的定义以及避免获得医疗服务的障碍,这些挑战可能与那些在紧缩时期全民医疗保健系统受到影响的国家所面临的挑战相似。