Institute of Psychology, University of Greifswald, Germany.
Institute of Psychology, University of Kassel, Germany.
Br J Dev Psychol. 2018 Sep;36(3):418-437. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12228. Epub 2017 Dec 25.
Adults' mental rotation performance with body-like stimuli is enhanced if these stimuli are anatomically compatible with a human body, but decreased by anatomically incompatible stimuli. In this study, we investigated these effects for kindergartners and first-graders: When asked to mentally rotate cube configurations attached with human body parts in an anatomically compatible way, allowing for the projection of a human body, children performed better than with pure cube combinations. By contrast, when body parts were attached in an anatomically incompatible way, disallowing the projection of a human body, children performed worse than with pure combinations. This experiment is of specific interest against the background of two different theoretical approaches concerning imagery and the motor system in development: One approach assumes an increasing integration of motor processes and imagery over time that enables older children and adults to requisition motor resources for imagery processes, while the other postulates that imagery stems from early sensorimotor processes in the first place, and is disentangled from it over time. The finding that children of the two age groups tested show exactly the same effects as adults when mentally rotating anatomically compatible and incompatible stimuli is interpreted in favour of the latter approach. Statement of contribution What is already known on this subject? In mental rotation, adults perform better when rotating anatomically possible stimuli as compared to rotating standard cube combinations. Performance is worse when rotating anatomically impossible stimuli. What does this study add? The present study shows that children's mental transformations mirror those of adults in these respects. In case of the anatomically impossible stimuli, this highlights an inflexible use of embodiment in both age groups. This is in line with the Piagetian assumption of imagery being based on sensorimotor processes.
成人在进行身体类似刺激的心理旋转时,如果这些刺激与人体在解剖学上是相容的,那么他们的表现会更好,但如果刺激与人体在解剖学上是不相容的,那么他们的表现会更差。在这项研究中,我们调查了幼儿园和一年级儿童的这些影响:当要求他们以一种在解剖学上相容的方式对附着有人体部位的立方体构型进行心理旋转,从而可以投射出一个人体时,儿童的表现要好于纯立方体组合。相比之下,当人体部位以一种在解剖学上不相容的方式附着,从而不允许投射出人体时,儿童的表现比纯组合差。在关于想象和运动系统在发展中的两种不同理论方法的背景下,这项实验具有特殊的意义:一种方法假设随着时间的推移,运动过程和想象会越来越整合,从而使年龄较大的儿童和成年人能够为想象过程征运动资源,而另一种方法则假设想象首先源自早期的感觉运动过程,并随着时间的推移与之分离。测试的两个年龄组的儿童在心理旋转解剖学上相容和不相容的刺激时表现出与成人完全相同的效果,这一发现支持了后一种方法。
关于这个主题已经知道些什么?在心理旋转中,与旋转标准立方体组合相比,成人在旋转解剖学上可能的刺激时表现更好。当旋转解剖学上不可能的刺激时,表现会更差。这项研究增加了什么?本研究表明,在这些方面,儿童的心理转换反映了成人的心理转换。在不可能的解剖学刺激的情况下,这突出了两个年龄组在身体表现上的僵化使用。这与基于感觉运动过程的想象是基于感觉运动过程的皮亚杰假设是一致的。