Sun Qun-Zhou, Ruan Cheng-Qun, Li Guang-Ming, Chen Wu-Lin, Ding Qiang, Zhang Chun-Jian
Luoyang Traditional Chinese Orthopaedics and Traumatic Hospital of Henan, Luoyang 471002, Henan, China;
Luoyang Traditional Chinese Orthopaedics and Traumatic Hospital of Henan, Luoyang 471002, Henan, China.
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2016 Aug 25;29(8):684-688. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2016.08.002.
To compare the clinical effects of two methods of internal fixation in treating unstable femoral intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients.
From August 2009 to August 2014, 68 elderly patients with unstable femoral intertrochanteric fracture treated with locking proximal femur plate and auxiliary short reconstructed plate (reconstructing calcar group) and proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA group) with clinical course from 1 to 3 days were retrospectively analyzed. In reconstructing calcar group, there were 30 patients including 8 males and 22 females, aged from 63 to 85 years old with an average of (73.41±5.12) years old, the fractures were classified to type AO 31-A2.2 in 12 cases, A2.3 in 11 cases, A3.3 in 7 cases according to AO/ASIF classification. In PFNA group, there were 38 patients including 10 males and 28 females, aged from 65 to 90 years old with an average of (74.26±4.53) years old, the fractures were classified to type AO 31-A2.2 in 15 cases, A2.3 in 13 cases, A3.3 in 10 cases. All fracture were caused by injury, leading pain and swelling. Femoral intertrochanteric fracture was confirmed by X ray films. The data of each group were collected for statistical analysis on the following aspects: the incision length, operation time, blood loss volume, postoperative partial weight bearing standing time, clinical healing time of fracture, postoperative complications, and hip functional score of Harris.
All incisions were healed at stage I. In the aspect of postoperative complications, there were 1 case of screw blade cutting and 1 case of deep venous thrombosis in PFNA group; there was 1 case of deep venous thrombosis in the reconstructing calcar group (²=0.000, =1.000). Patients were followed up from 20 to 24 months with an average of 22.5 months. There were no significant in postoperative partial weight bearing standing time, postoperative complications, hip functional score of Harris between two group. There were significant in the incision length, operation time, blood loss volume, clinical healing time of fracture. In the incision length, operation time, blood loss volume, clinical healing time of fracture, the PFNA group was significantly differently less than that of the reconstructing calcar group (<0.001). In the clinical healing time of fracture, the PFNA group was significantly differently less than that of the reconstructing calcar group (<0.05).
For the treatment of unstable femoral intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients, reconstructing calcar and PFNA are both effective, and proximal femoral intramedullary nails may be the best choice, which can be simpler operation, smaller incision and less healing time.
比较两种内固定方法治疗老年不稳定型股骨粗隆间骨折的临床效果。
回顾性分析2009年8月至2014年8月间68例老年不稳定型股骨粗隆间骨折患者,这些患者在伤后1至3天内分别采用股骨近端锁定钢板联合辅助短重建钢板(重建股骨距组)和股骨近端抗旋髓内钉(PFNA组)治疗。重建股骨距组30例,男8例,女22例,年龄63至85岁,平均(73.41±5.12)岁,根据AO/ASIF分类,AO 31 - A2.2型12例,A2.3型11例,A3.3型7例。PFNA组38例,男10例,女28例,年龄65至90岁,平均(74.26±4.53)岁,AO 31 - A2.2型15例,A2.3型13例,A3.3型10例。所有骨折均由外伤引起,伴有疼痛和肿胀,经X线片确诊为股骨粗隆间骨折。收集两组患者以下方面的数据进行统计学分析:切口长度、手术时间、失血量、术后部分负重站立时间、骨折临床愈合时间、术后并发症及Harris髋关节功能评分。
所有切口均一期愈合。术后并发症方面,PFNA组发生1例螺旋刀片切割及1例深静脉血栓形成;重建股骨距组发生1例深静脉血栓形成(χ² = 0.000,P = 1.000)。患者随访20至24个月,平均22.5个月。两组患者术后部分负重站立时间、术后并发症、Harris髋关节功能评分比较差异无统计学意义。切口长度、手术时间、失血量、骨折临床愈合时间比较差异有统计学意义。在切口长度、手术时间、失血量、骨折临床愈合时间方面,PFNA组均显著少于重建股骨距组(P < 0.001)。在骨折临床愈合时间方面,PFNA组显著少于重建股骨距组(P < 0.05)。
对于老年不稳定型股骨粗隆间骨折的治疗,重建股骨距和PFNA均有效,股骨近端髓内钉可能是最佳选择,其手术操作更简单,切口更小,愈合时间更短。