Khan Saad Jawaid, Khan Soobia Saad, Usman Juliana, Mokhtar Abdul Halim, Abu Osman Noor Azuan
1 Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
2 Department of Biomedical Engineering, Riphah International University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2018 Feb;232(2):163-171. doi: 10.1177/0954411917750409. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
This study aims to investigate the effects of varying toe angles at different platform settings on Overall Stability Index of postural stability and fall risk using Biodex Balance System in healthy participants and medial knee osteoarthritis patients. Biodex Balance System was employed to measure postural stability and fall risk at different foot progression angles (ranging from -20° to 40°, with 10° increments) on 20 healthy (control group) and 20 knee osteoarthritis patients (osteoarthritis group) randomly (age: 59.50 ± 7.33 years and 61.50 ± 8.63 years; body mass: 69.95 ± 9.86 kg and 70.45 ± 8.80 kg). Platform settings used were (1) static, (2) postural stability dynamic level 8 (PS8), (3) fall risk levels 12 to 8 (FR12) and (4) fall risk levels 8 to 2 (FR8). Data from the tests were analysed using three-way mixed repeated measures analysis of variance. The participant group, platform settings and toe angles all had a significant main effect on balance ( p ≤ 0.02). Platform settings had a significant interaction effect with participant group F(3, 144) = 6.97, p < 0.01 and toe angles F(21, 798) = 2.83, p < 0.01. Non-significant interactions were found for group × toe angles, F(7, 266) = 0.89, p = 0.50, and for group × toe angles × settings, F(21, 798) = 1.07, p = 0.36. The medial knee osteoarthritis group has a poorer postural stability and increased fall risk as compared to the healthy group. Changing platform settings has a more pronounced effect on balance in knee osteoarthritis group than in healthy participants. Changing toe angles produced similar effects in both the participant groups, with decreased stability and increased fall risk at extreme toe-in and toe-out angles.
本研究旨在利用Biodex平衡系统,调查在不同平台设置下,不同足趾角度对健康参与者和内侧膝关节骨关节炎患者姿势稳定性的总体稳定指数及跌倒风险的影响。使用Biodex平衡系统,在20名健康受试者(对照组)和20名膝关节骨关节炎患者(骨关节炎组)中,随机测量不同足部前进角度(范围为-20°至40°,增量为10°)下的姿势稳定性和跌倒风险(年龄:59.50±7.33岁和61.50±8.63岁;体重:69.95±9.86千克和70.45±8.80千克)。所使用的平台设置为:(1)静态,(2)姿势稳定性动态水平8(PS8),(3)跌倒风险水平12至8(FR12),以及(4)跌倒风险水平8至2(FR8)。使用三因素混合重复测量方差分析对测试数据进行分析。参与者组、平台设置和足趾角度对平衡均有显著的主效应(p≤0.02)。平台设置与参与者组存在显著的交互效应,F(3, 144)=6.97,p<0.01,与足趾角度也存在显著交互效应,F(21, 798)=2.83,p<0.01。未发现组×足趾角度的显著交互作用,F(7, 266)=0.89,p=0.50,以及组×足趾角度×设置的显著交互作用,F(21, 798)=1.07,p=0.36。与健康组相比,内侧膝关节骨关节炎组的姿势稳定性较差,跌倒风险增加。改变平台设置对膝关节骨关节炎组平衡的影响比对健康参与者更为显著。改变足趾角度在两个参与者组中产生了相似的效果,在极端内翻和外翻角度时稳定性降低,跌倒风险增加。