Batra Ruchika, Sharma Hannah E, Elaraoud Ibrahim, Mohamed Shabbir
a Department of Ophthalmology , University Hospitals Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Semin Ophthalmol. 2018;33(6):733-738. doi: 10.1080/08820538.2017.1418012. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
The National Patient Safety Agency (2009) publication advising timely follow-up of patients with established glaucoma followed several reported instances of visual loss due to postponed appointments and patients lost to follow-up. The Royal College of Ophthalmologists Quality Standards Development Group stated that all hospital appointments should occur within 15% of the intended follow-up period.
To determine whether: 1. Glaucoma follow-up appointments at a teaching hospital occur within the requested time 2. Appointments are requested at appropriate intervals based on the NICE Guidelines 3. The capacity of the glaucoma service is adequate Methods: A two-part audit was undertaken of 98 and 99 consecutive patients respectively attending specialist glaucoma clinics. In the first part, the reasons for delayed appointments were recorded. In the second part the requested follow-up was compared with NICE guidelines where applicable. Based on the findings, changes were implemented and a re-audit of 100 patients was carried out.
The initial audit found that although clinical decisions regarding follow-up intervals were 100% compliant with NICE guidelines where applicable, 24% of appointments were delayed beyond 15% of the requested period, due to administrative errors and inadequate capacity, leading to significant clinical deterioration in two patients. Following the introduction of an electronic appointment tracker and increased clinical capacity created by extra clinics and clinicians, the re-audit found a marked decrease in the percentage of appointments being delayed (9%).
This audit is a useful tool to evaluate glaucoma service provision, assist in resource planning for the service and bring about change in a non-confrontational way. It can be widely applied and adapted for use in other medical specialities.
国家患者安全机构(2009年)发布了一份出版物,建议对已确诊的青光眼患者进行及时随访,此前有几起因预约推迟和患者失访导致视力丧失的报告案例。皇家眼科医学院质量标准制定小组指出,所有医院预约应在预定随访期的15%以内进行。
确定:1. 教学医院的青光眼随访预约是否在要求的时间内进行;2. 根据英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)指南,预约是否按适当的间隔进行;3. 青光眼服务的能力是否足够。方法:分别对连续98例和99例到青光眼专科门诊就诊的患者进行了两部分的审核。第一部分记录预约延迟的原因。第二部分将要求的随访与适用的NICE指南进行比较。根据审核结果进行了改进,并对100例患者进行了重新审核。
初步审核发现,虽然在适用情况下,关于随访间隔的临床决策100%符合NICE指南,但由于行政失误和能力不足,24%的预约延迟超过了要求时间的15%,导致两名患者出现明显的临床恶化。在引入电子预约跟踪器以及通过增设门诊和临床医生增加临床能力后,重新审核发现预约延迟的百分比显著下降(9%)。
本次审核是评估青光眼服务提供情况、协助该服务进行资源规划以及以非对抗方式带来改变的有用工具。它可广泛应用并适用于其他医学专科。