• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

玻璃体切除术后炎症中卤替泼诺 0.5%和地塞米松 1%的疗效和安全性比较。

Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Loteprednol Etabonate 0.5% and Topical Dexamethasone 1% in Post-Vitrectomy Inflammation.

机构信息

a Akdeniz University , Department of Ophthalmology , Antalya , Turkey.

b Elmali State Hospital , Antalya , Turkey.

出版信息

Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2019;27(2):312-318. doi: 10.1080/09273948.2017.1410182. Epub 2017 Dec 28.

DOI:10.1080/09273948.2017.1410182
PMID:29283786
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy and safety of postoperative topical loteprednol etabonate (LE) 0.5% with dexamethasone (DEX) 0.1% for the treatment of inflammation following pars plana vitrectomy (PPV).

METHODS

A total of 150 eyes of 150 patients who underwent transconjunctival PPV for various diagnoses were included in this prospective, randomized study. The patients were assigned into two groups as Group LE (n = 75) and Group DEX (n = 75). Intraocular inflammation, intraocular pressure (IOP), and the intensity of postoperative pain were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

The mean IOP was higher in the patients treated with DEX (p > 0.05). The need for anti-glaucoma medications was significantly lower in Group LE (5.3%) than in Group DEX (17.3%) (p = 0.020). Tyndall scores were less in Group DEX at postoperative Days 1 (p = 0.01) and 3 (p = 0.017). On Day 1, it was more likely for patients to have mild or moderate pain in Group LE (p < 0.001). On Day 3, the number of the patients with no pain was higher in Group DEX (p = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Although DEX is more effective in the early postoperative days, LE appears to be as effective in controlling inflammatory response following PPV in the long-term. Topical LE is associated with less increase in the IOP and a lower need for anti-glaucoma medications.

摘要

目的

比较术后局部应用曲安奈德(DEX)0.1%与洛度沙胺(LE)0.5%治疗玻璃体切除术(PPV)后炎症的疗效和安全性。

方法

本前瞻性、随机研究纳入了 150 例因各种诊断接受经结膜 PPV 的患者的 150 只眼。患者被分为两组,即 LE 组(n=75)和 DEX 组(n=75)。比较两组患者的眼内炎症、眼内压(IOP)和术后疼痛强度。

结果

DEX 治疗组的平均 IOP 较高(p>0.05)。LE 组(5.3%)需要抗青光眼药物治疗的患者明显少于 DEX 组(17.3%)(p=0.020)。DEX 组在术后第 1 天(p=0.01)和第 3 天(p=0.017)的 Tyndall 评分较低。在第 1 天,LE 组患者发生轻度或中度疼痛的可能性更大(p<0.001)。在第 3 天,DEX 组无疼痛的患者人数更多(p=0.005)。

结论

尽管 DEX 在术后早期更有效,但 LE 在长期内似乎同样能有效控制 PPV 后的炎症反应。局部应用 LE 可使 IOP 升高减少,需要抗青光眼药物治疗的可能性降低。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Loteprednol Etabonate 0.5% and Topical Dexamethasone 1% in Post-Vitrectomy Inflammation.玻璃体切除术后炎症中卤替泼诺 0.5%和地塞米松 1%的疗效和安全性比较。
Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2019;27(2):312-318. doi: 10.1080/09273948.2017.1410182. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
2
A double-masked, placebo-controlled evaluation of 0.5% loteprednol etabonate in the treatment of postoperative inflammation. The Loteprednol Etabonate Postoperative Inflammation Study Group 2.0.5% 氯替泼诺依碳酸酯治疗术后炎症的双盲、安慰剂对照评估。氯替泼诺依碳酸酯术后炎症研究组2。
Ophthalmology. 1998 Sep;105(9):1780-6. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(98)99054-6.
3
A randomized controlled trial comparing dexamethasone with loteprednol etabonate on postoperative photorefractive keratectomy.一项比较地塞米松与氯替泼诺酯在准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术后应用效果的随机对照试验。
J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2015 Apr;31(3):165-8. doi: 10.1089/jop.2014.0107. Epub 2015 Jan 2.
4
Loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic suspension 0.5 %: efficacy and safety for postoperative anti-inflammatory use.0.5%氯替泼诺妥布酯眼用混悬液:术后抗炎使用的疗效与安全性。
Int Ophthalmol. 2012 Oct;32(5):507-17. doi: 10.1007/s10792-012-9589-2. Epub 2012 Jun 16.
5
Comparison of ketorolac tromethamine 0.5% and loteprednol etabonate 0.5% for inflammation after phacoemulsification: prospective randomized double-masked study.比较0.5%酮咯酸氨丁三醇和0.5%氯替泼诺醇酯在超声乳化术后炎症中的作用:前瞻性随机双盲研究。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002 Jan;28(1):93-9. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(01)01185-3.
6
Impact of the Topical Ophthalmic Corticosteroid Loteprednol Etabonate on Intraocular Pressure.局部用眼科皮质类固醇药物氯替泼诺对眼压的影响。
Adv Ther. 2016 Apr;33(4):532-52. doi: 10.1007/s12325-016-0315-8. Epub 2016 Mar 17.
7
Safety and tolerability of loteprednol etabonate 0.5% and tobramycin 0.3% ophthalmic suspension in pediatric subjects.在儿科受试者中,使用 0.5%洛度沙胺滴眼剂和 0.3%妥布霉素滴眼剂的安全性和耐受性。
Paediatr Drugs. 2012 Apr 1;14(2):119-30. doi: 10.2165/11596320-000000000-00000.
8
Double-masked, placebo-controlled evaluation of loteprednol etabonate 0.5% for postoperative inflammation. Loteprednol Etabonate Post-operative Inflammation Study Group 1.0.5%氯替泼诺酯用于术后炎症的双盲、安慰剂对照评估。氯替泼诺酯术后炎症研究组1。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998 Nov;24(11):1480-9. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(98)80170-3.
9
Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Efficacy of Topical Loteprednol Etabonate 0.5% Versus Cyclosporine-A 0.05% for Treatment of Dry Eye Syndrome Following Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.比较0.5%氯替泼诺乙酯与0.05%环孢素A治疗造血干细胞移植后干眼症综合征疗效的前瞻性随机试验
Cornea. 2015 Jul;34(7):725-32. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000436.
10
Comparison of 2 regimens of loteprednol etabonate and bromfenac for cataract surgery.白内障手术中两种卤替泼诺和溴芬酸钠治疗方案的比较。
Can J Ophthalmol. 2019 Jun;54(3):388-394. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2018.07.007. Epub 2018 Aug 30.