Suppr超能文献

氯氮平与喹硫平治疗难治性精神分裂症的疗效及耐受性比较

Efficacy and Tolerability of Clozapine versus Quetiapine in Treatment-resistant Schizophrenia.

作者信息

Kumar Mitesh, Chavan B S, Sidana Ajeet, Das Subhash

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Government Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh, India.

出版信息

Indian J Psychol Med. 2017 Nov-Dec;39(6):770-776. doi: 10.4103/IJPSYM.IJPSYM_111_17.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy and tolerability of clozapine and quetiapine in patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this prospective, randomized, open label study of 14 weeks, 53 patients with schizophrenia diagnosed as per ICD-10 and fulfilling the modified version of Conley and Kelly's criteria of TRS were randomly assigned to receive clozapine or quetiapine as per a computer-generated random table. After 2-weeks of dose-titration phase, doses were fixed at minimum therapeutic dose and subsequently adjusted according to the clinical improvement. All patients received dosage of respective drug in therapeutic range. 13 patients were lost to follow up. Treatment efficacy and side effects were evaluated with standardized rating scales.

RESULTS

Clozapine group (reduction in total score: mean=14.45, SD=10.39) had significantly greater reductions (P=0.004; CI=3.541-17.059) in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score, PANSS positive subscale and PANSS general psychopathology subscale at 14 weeks in comparison to the quetiapine group (reduction in total score: mean=4.15, SD=10.71). Significant reduction in PANSS negative subscale was seen with both drugs but no significant difference was present between the two drugs. At 14 weeks, 30% patients in clozapine group and 15% patients in quetiapine group showed response. Clozapine led to significantly greater side effects (P< 0.001, CI=2.241-6.059) on Glassgow Antipsychotic Side-effect Scale (GASS) than quetiapine.

CONCLUSIONS

Clozapine was found to be more efficacious than quetiapine in patients with TRS but was associated with greater side effects. Both the drugs were found to be equally effective in reducing the negative symptoms.

摘要

目的

比较氯氮平和喹硫平治疗难治性精神分裂症(TRS)患者的疗效和耐受性。

患者与方法

在这项为期14周的前瞻性、随机、开放标签研究中,53例根据ICD - 10诊断为精神分裂症且符合Conley和Kelly改良版TRS标准的患者,按照计算机生成的随机表随机分配接受氯氮平或喹硫平治疗。在2周的剂量滴定阶段后,剂量固定在最小治疗剂量,随后根据临床改善情况进行调整。所有患者均接受各自药物治疗范围内的剂量。13例患者失访。用标准化评定量表评估治疗效果和副作用。

结果

与喹硫平组(总分降低:均值 = 4.15,标准差 = 10.71)相比,氯氮平组(总分降低:均值 = 14.45,标准差 = 10.39)在14周时阳性与阴性症状量表(PANSS)总分、PANSS阳性分量表和PANSS一般精神病理学分量表上有显著更大程度的降低(P = 0.004;可信区间 = 3.541 - 17.059)。两种药物在PANSS阴性分量表上均有显著降低,但两种药物之间无显著差异。在14周时,氯氮平组30%的患者和喹硫平组15%的患者显示有反应。氯氮平在格拉斯哥抗精神病药物副作用量表(GASS)上导致的副作用显著大于喹硫平(P < 0.001,可信区间 = 2.241 - 6.059)。

结论

在TRS患者中,发现氯氮平比喹硫平更有效,但副作用更大。发现两种药物在减轻阴性症状方面同样有效。

相似文献

1
Efficacy and Tolerability of Clozapine versus Quetiapine in Treatment-resistant Schizophrenia.
Indian J Psychol Med. 2017 Nov-Dec;39(6):770-776. doi: 10.4103/IJPSYM.IJPSYM_111_17.
3
Quetiapine : A Review of its Use in Schizophrenia.
CNS Drugs. 1998 Apr;9(4):325-40. doi: 10.2165/00023210-199809040-00007.
7
The validity and sensitivity of PANSS-6 in treatment-resistant schizophrenia.
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2018 Nov;138(5):420-431. doi: 10.1111/acps.12952. Epub 2018 Aug 30.
8
An open, large, 6-month naturalistic study of outcome in schizophrenic outpatients, treated with olanzapine.
Hum Psychopharmacol. 2011 Jan;26(1):81-5. doi: 10.1002/hup.1173. Epub 2011 Feb 9.
10
Quetiapine versus other atypical antipsychotics for schizophrenia.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Nov 18;2013(11):CD006625. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006625.pub3.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
The global burden of mental, neurological and substance use disorders: an analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010.
PLoS One. 2015 Feb 6;10(2):e0116820. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116820. eCollection 2015.
2
Pharmacotherapy of treatment-resistant schizophrenia: a clinical perspective.
Evid Based Ment Health. 2014 May;17(2):33-7. doi: 10.1136/eb-2014-101813. Epub 2014 Apr 8.
3
Results of phase 3 of the CATIE schizophrenia trial.
Schizophr Res. 2009 Jan;107(1):1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2008.10.011. Epub 2008 Nov 21.
4
A meta-analysis of head-to-head comparisons of second-generation antipsychotics in the treatment of schizophrenia.
Am J Psychiatry. 2009 Feb;166(2):152-63. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.08030368. Epub 2008 Nov 17.
5
The Declaration of Helsinki and public health.
Bull World Health Organ. 2008 Aug;86(8):650-2. doi: 10.2471/blt.08.050955.
6
A new self-rating scale for detecting atypical or second-generation antipsychotic side effects.
J Psychopharmacol. 2008 May;22(3):238-43. doi: 10.1177/0269881107087976.
10
Augmentation strategies in clozapine-resistant schizophrenia.
CNS Drugs. 2005;19(10):843-72. doi: 10.2165/00023210-200519100-00004.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验