Attri Joginder Pal, Singh Manjit, Bhatt Hemchandra, Jyoti Kamal, Kaur Harjinder
Department of Anaesthesia, Government Medical College, Amritsar, Punjab, India.
Anesth Essays Res. 2017 Oct-Dec;11(4):816-820. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_20_17.
The availability of rapid and short-acting intravenous and volatile anesthetics has facilitated early recovery that is why nowadays ambulatory surgery is becoming more common. If the criteria used to discharge patients from the Postanesthesia Care Unit (PACU) are met in the operating room (OR), it would be appropriate to consider bypassing the PACU and transferring the patient directly to the step-down unit. This process is known as "fast-tracking" after ambulatory surgery.
To compare hemodynamic characteristics and recovery profile as per fast-track criteria (FTC) of recovery and postanesthesia discharge scoring system (PADSS) between sevoflurane and desflurane.
One hundred American Society of Anesthesiologists Class I-II patients aged 20-50 years were randomly divided into two groups. Following anesthesia induction with injection propofol and injection dexmedetomidine airway was secured with i-gel, Group D ( = 50) received desflurane + dexmedetomidine + O + NO and Group S ( = 50) received sevoflurane in place of desflurane. Emergence time was noted and FTC was evaluated in the OR, Score >12 is considered as shifting criteria for ambulatory surgery unit (ASU). PADSS was noted in ASU at an interval of 15 min for 3 h and Score >9 is considered as ready to discharge home.
Response to pain, verbal commands, and spontaneous eye opening in Group D was shorter than that in Group S ( = 0.001). Mean time to achieve FTC score >12 was 15 min in both the groups. Eighty-six percent of patients were ready to go home between 60 and 90 min using PADSS.
We concluded that early recovery is faster for desflurane, and there is no difference in ready to go home time between desflurane and sevoflurane.
快速起效和短效的静脉及挥发性麻醉剂的出现促进了早期恢复,这就是如今门诊手术越来越普遍的原因。如果在手术室(OR)满足将患者从麻醉后恢复室(PACU)转出的标准,那么考虑绕过PACU并将患者直接转至过渡病房是合适的。这个过程在门诊手术后被称为“快速通道”。
比较七氟烷和地氟烷根据快速通道标准(FTC)以及麻醉后出院评分系统(PADSS)的恢复情况的血流动力学特征和恢复概况。
100例年龄在20至50岁的美国麻醉医师协会I-II级患者被随机分为两组。用丙泊酚注射液和右美托咪定注射液诱导麻醉后,使用i-gel确保气道安全,D组(n = 50)接受地氟烷+右美托咪定+氧气+氧化亚氮,S组(n = 50)用七氟烷代替地氟烷。记录苏醒时间,并在手术室评估FTC,评分>12被视为门诊手术单元(ASU)的转移标准。在ASU每隔15分钟记录一次PADSS,持续3小时,评分>9被视为准备出院回家。
D组对疼痛、言语指令和自主睁眼的反应时间短于S组(P = 0.001)。两组达到FTC评分>12的平均时间均为15分钟。使用PADSS,86%的患者在60至90分钟之间准备好回家。
我们得出结论,地氟烷的早期恢复更快,地氟烷和七氟烷在准备回家时间上没有差异。