CBR - Center of Breach Research(1), Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Therapy, Saarland University Medical Center and Saarland University Faculty of Medicine, 66421 Homburg, Saar, Germany.
CBR - Center of Breach Research(1), Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Therapy, Saarland University Medical Center and Saarland University Faculty of Medicine, 66421 Homburg, Saar, Germany.
J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2018 Feb 20;150:341-346. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2017.12.043. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
Propofol concentration in human plasma can be quantified by liquid chromatography coupled mass spectrometry. Sample preparation usually requires solid phase extraction to remove matrix components and enrich the analyte. To facilitate user-independent measurements and speed extraction, we developed and validated a fully automated high throughput in-line sample preparation system with direct injection into liquid chromatography coupled mass spectrometry. We assessed linearity of each method over the clinically relevant concentration range from 0.5μg/mL to 8μg/mL plasma concentration. R values were 0.99 for the automated process and 0.98 for manual sample preparation. The limit of detection was 6ng/mL and the lower limit of quantification was 18ng/mL for the automated method; for the manual process, the limit of detection was 1.58ng/mL and the lower limit of quantification was 4.79ng/mL. Intra-day precision for low, medium and high concentration range of the automated method was validated 4.14%, 9.68% and 3.04% relative standard deviation and 0.29%, 0.12% and 0.52% for the manual process. Carry over was 0.4% with the automated method, whereas there was no carry over with the manual method. Stability of plasma samples was tested with the manual method at concentrations of 1, 4, and 6μg/mL propofol and found to be stable over 150days at -20°C. The manual sample preparation method has successfully been transferred to a fully automated process with appropriate sensitivity and precision but the automatization failed with regard to trueness and working time due to lengthy sample preparation runtime. Therefore it is not suitable for daily use in a hospital laboratory e.g. for brain death diagnosis in the intensive care unit.
人血浆中丙泊酚浓度可采用液相色谱-串联质谱法进行定量分析。样品制备通常需要固相萃取以去除基质成分并对分析物进行富集。为了实现用户独立的测量和加速提取,我们开发并验证了一种完全自动化的高通量在线样品制备系统,可直接进样至液相色谱-串联质谱。我们评估了每个方法在临床相关浓度范围内(0.5μg/mL 至 8μg/mL 血浆浓度)的线性。自动化过程的 R 值为 0.99,手动样品制备的 R 值为 0.98。自动化方法的检测限为 6ng/mL,定量下限为 18ng/mL;对于手动过程,检测限为 1.58ng/mL,定量下限为 4.79ng/mL。自动化方法的低、中、高浓度范围的日内精密度分别验证为 4.14%、9.68%和 3.04%相对标准偏差,手动过程分别为 0.29%、0.12%和 0.52%。自动化方法的交叉污染率为 0.4%,而手动方法没有交叉污染。采用手动方法在浓度为 1、4 和 6μg/mL 丙泊酚时测试了血浆样品的稳定性,发现其在-20°C 下可稳定 150 天。手动样品制备方法已成功转移到具有适当灵敏度和精密度的全自动过程中,但由于样品制备时间过长,自动化在准确性和工作时间方面失败。因此,它不适合在医院实验室中日常使用,例如在重症监护病房进行脑死亡诊断。