Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, University of Ioannina Medical School, Ioannina, Greece.
Translational Psychiatry Research Group, Department of Clinical Medicine, Federal University of Ceará Medical School, Fortaleza, Brazil.
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2018 Feb;137(2):88-97. doi: 10.1111/acps.12847. Epub 2017 Dec 30.
This study aimed to systematically appraise the meta-analyses of observational studies on risk factors and peripheral biomarkers for schizophrenia spectrum disorders.
We conducted an umbrella review to capture all meta-analyses and Mendelian randomization studies that examined associations between non-genetic risk factors and schizophrenia spectrum disorders. For each eligible meta-analysis, we estimated the summary effect size estimate, its 95% confidence and prediction intervals and the I metric. Additionally, evidence for small-study effects and excess significance bias was assessed.
Overall, we found 41 eligible papers including 98 associations. Sixty-two associations had a nominally significant (P-value <0.05) effect. Seventy-two of the associations exhibited large or very large between-study heterogeneity, while 13 associations had evidence for small-study effects. Excess significance bias was found in 18 associations. Only five factors (childhood adversities, cannabis use, history of obstetric complications, stressful events during adulthood, and serum folate level) showed robust evidence.
Despite identifying 98 associations, there is only robust evidence to suggest that cannabis use, exposure to stressful events during childhood and adulthood, history of obstetric complications, and low serum folate level confer a higher risk for developing schizophrenia spectrum disorders. The evidence on peripheral biomarkers for schizophrenia spectrum disorders remains limited.
本研究旨在系统评价观察性研究中关于精神分裂症谱系障碍风险因素和外周生物标志物的荟萃分析。
我们进行了伞式综述,以捕获所有检查非遗传风险因素与精神分裂症谱系障碍之间关联的荟萃分析和孟德尔随机化研究。对于每个合格的荟萃分析,我们估计了汇总效应大小估计值、其 95%置信区间和预测区间以及 I 度量。此外,还评估了小样本效应和过度显著性偏差的证据。
总体而言,我们发现了 41 篇合格的论文,其中包括 98 项关联。62 项关联具有显著的(P 值<0.05)效应。72 项关联表现出较大或非常大的研究间异质性,而 13 项关联具有小样本效应的证据。18 项关联存在过度显著性偏差。只有五个因素(儿童时期的逆境、大麻使用、产科并发症史、成年期的应激事件和血清叶酸水平)具有可靠的证据。
尽管确定了 98 项关联,但只有强有力的证据表明大麻使用、儿童和成年期暴露于应激事件、产科并发症史和低血清叶酸水平会增加患精神分裂症谱系障碍的风险。精神分裂症谱系障碍的外周生物标志物证据仍然有限。