• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术是解决之道吗?一项系统文献综述与荟萃分析。

Is Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy the Solution? A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Dragomir Mihnea, Eftimie Mihai Adrian

出版信息

Chirurgia (Bucur). 2017 Nov-Dec;112(6):653-663. doi: 10.21614/chirurgia.112.6.653.

DOI:10.21614/chirurgia.112.6.653
PMID:29288607
Abstract

RAMPS is considered, in high volume centers, as the best treatment for adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas. PubMed database was searched. The results of studies that compared RAMPS with SRPS were analyzed by meta-analytical methods. Five studies, published between 2013 and 2016, were suitable for quantitative synthesis. 285 unique patients were included, 135 patients in the RAMPS group and 150 patients in the SRPS group. Regarding retrieved lymph nodes, the mean difference was 6.54. This difference was considered to be statistical significant, P 0.00001. A complete tumor resection was observed in 115 of 129 patients who underwent RAMPS and in the case of the standard procedure a R0 resection was obtained in 107 cases out of 137, the RR was 1.17 (95% CI, 1.04, 1.32). One-year overall survival was found to be 79.2% in the RAMPS groups compared with 64.29% in the SRPS group. This difference is considered statistically significant, with a P value of 0.02. RAMPS is a safe procedure for the treatment of adenocarcinomas of the body and tail of the pancreas. RAMPS procedure is superior to SRPS in terms of lymph node retrieval and R0 resections.

摘要

在高容量中心,逆行胰体尾切除术(RAMPS)被认为是治疗胰体尾腺癌的最佳方法。检索了PubMed数据库。采用荟萃分析方法分析了比较RAMPS与标准逆行胰体尾切除术(SRPS)的研究结果。2013年至2016年间发表的五项研究适合进行定量综合分析。纳入了285例独特患者,其中RAMPS组135例,SRPS组150例。关于获取的淋巴结,平均差异为6.54。该差异被认为具有统计学意义,P<0.00001。在接受RAMPS的129例患者中,有115例实现了肿瘤完全切除;在标准手术组中,137例中有107例实现了R0切除,相对危险度(RR)为1.17(95%可信区间为1.04至1.32)。RAMPS组的一年总生存率为79.2%,而SRPS组为64.29%。该差异被认为具有统计学意义,P值为0.02。RAMPS是治疗胰体尾腺癌的一种安全手术方法。RAMPS手术在淋巴结获取和R0切除方面优于SRPS。

相似文献

1
Is Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy the Solution? A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis.根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术是解决之道吗?一项系统文献综述与荟萃分析。
Chirurgia (Bucur). 2017 Nov-Dec;112(6):653-663. doi: 10.21614/chirurgia.112.6.653.
2
A systematic review of radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas.根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术治疗胰体尾腺癌的系统评价
HPB (Oxford). 2017 Jan;19(1):10-15. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2016.07.014. Epub 2016 Aug 21.
3
Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy versus standard procedure in the treatment of left-sided pancreatic cancer: A systemic review and meta-analysis.根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术与标准手术治疗左侧胰腺癌的系统评价和荟萃分析
BMC Surg. 2017 Jun 5;17(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12893-017-0259-1.
4
Comparison of Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy Versus Standard Distal Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Propensity Score Matching Study.根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术与标准远端胰腺切除术治疗胰腺导管腺癌的比较:一项倾向评分匹配研究
World J Surg. 2025 Jun 18. doi: 10.1002/wjs.12630.
5
Comparison of laparoscopic versus open radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for pancreatic cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜与开腹根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术治疗胰腺癌的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2022 Jul;103:106676. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106676. Epub 2022 May 13.
6
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.
7
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
8
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
9
Robotic radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) versus standard retrograde pancreatosplenectomy (SRPS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.机器人辅助顺行模块化胰脾切除术(RAMPS)与标准逆行胰脾切除术(SRPS)的比较:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2020 Apr 3;21(1):306. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04250-0.
10
Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) and Standard Retrograde Pancreatosplenectomy (SPRS) for Left-Sided Pancreatic Cancer.根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术(RAMPS)与标准逆行胰脾切除术(SPRS)治疗左侧胰腺癌的手术结果比较
World J Surg. 2016 Sep;40(9):2267-75. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3526-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Survival Outcomes between Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy and Conventional Distal Pancreatosplenectomy for Pancreatic Body and Tail Cancer: Korean Multicenter Propensity Score Match Analysis.根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术与传统远端胰脾切除术治疗胰体尾癌的生存结果比较:韩国多中心倾向评分匹配分析
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Apr 18;16(8):1546. doi: 10.3390/cancers16081546.
2
Distal pancreatectomy with or without radical approach, vascular resections and splenectomy: Easier does not always mean easy.采用或不采用根治性术式的远端胰腺切除术、血管切除术和脾切除术:操作简单并不总是意味着容易。
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Jun 27;15(6):1020-1032. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i6.1020.
3
Anterior versus posterior radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for pancreatic body and tail cancer: an inverse probability of treatment weighting with survival analysis.
前入路与后入路根治性顺行模块化胰体尾切除术治疗胰体尾癌:基于生存分析的逆概率治疗加权。
Surg Today. 2023 Aug;53(8):917-929. doi: 10.1007/s00595-023-02651-7. Epub 2023 Mar 21.
4
Minimally invasive radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy: routine vs. modified.微创顺行模块化胰脾切除术:常规术式与改良术式对比
J Minim Invasive Surg. 2022 Dec 15;25(4):121-126. doi: 10.7602/jmis.2022.25.4.121.
5
Total laparoscopic radical antegrade modular pancreato-splenectomy with left-posterior superior mesenteric artery first-approach for distal pancreatic cancer: step-by-step technique with a surgical case report (with video).全腹腔镜下顺行模块化胰脾切除术联合肠系膜上动脉左后入路治疗胰头体尾部癌:手术步骤及 1 例报告(附视频)
World J Surg Oncol. 2022 Jul 5;20(1):224. doi: 10.1186/s12957-022-02657-4.
6
Role and Efficacy of Robotic-assisted Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) in Left-sided Pancreatic Cancer.机器人辅助顺行模块化胰脾切除术(RAMPS)在左侧胰腺癌中的作用及疗效
Cancer Diagn Progn. 2022 Mar 3;2(2):144-149. doi: 10.21873/cdp.10088. eCollection 2022 Mar-Apr.
7
The efficacy of radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2022 Nov;29(11):1156-1165. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.1120. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
8
Comparison of Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy with Standard Retrograde Pancreatosplenectomy for Left-Sided Pancreatic Cancer: A Meta-Analysis and Experience of a Single Center.左半侧胰腺癌行根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术与标准逆行胰脾切除术的比较:一项荟萃分析及单中心经验。
Med Sci Monit. 2019 Jun 21;25:4590-4601. doi: 10.12659/MSM.914540.