Suh Jihyun, Abrams Richard A
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, United States.
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, United States.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 Feb;183:10-18. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.12.003. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
In four experiments, participants estimated the sizes of target objects that were either out of reach, or that could be reached by a tool (a stylus or laser pointer). Objects reachable with the aid of a tool were perceived to be smaller than identical objects without a tool. Participants' responses to questioning rule out demand characteristics as an explanation. This new size illusion may reflect a direct impact of tool use on perceived size, or it may stem from the effects of tool use on perceived distance. Both possibilities support action specific accounts of perception.
在四项实验中,参与者估计了要么够不着、要么可以通过工具(触控笔或激光笔)够到的目标物体的大小。借助工具能够够到的物体被认为比没有工具时的相同物体更小。参与者对提问的回答排除了需求特征作为一种解释。这种新的大小错觉可能反映了工具使用对感知大小的直接影响,或者它可能源于工具使用对感知距离的影响。这两种可能性都支持感知的动作特异性观点。