Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230022, China.
Clin Rheumatol. 2018 Feb;37(2):439-450. doi: 10.1007/s10067-017-3966-1. Epub 2017 Dec 30.
The objective of the study is to quantitatively assess the risk of serious infections in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (AS) and non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) treated by biologics enrolled in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A systematic literature searches of MEDLINE (via PubMed), EMBASE, the Cochrane Library and abstracts archives of the annual scientific meetings of both the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) was conducted through October 2015. The RCTs that compared the safety of any biologics treatment for AS or nr-axSpA with placebo and/or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and/or conventional disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) with a minimum of 12 weeks of follow-up were selected independently by 2 reviewers. Twenty-five RCTs with data from 2403 patients were analyzed in the analysis. Patients included active AS in 21 studies and nr-axSpA in 4 studies were treated by 5 TNF inhibitors (adalimumab, certolizumab, etanercept, golimumab and infliximab) and 3 non-TNF inhibitors (sarilumab, tocilizumab, secukinumab). The risk of serious infections has no difference and numerically was only slightly increased in patients with AS and nr-axSpA treated by biologics compared with controls (OR = 1.42; 95%CI 0.58-3.47). Stratified analysis yielded the pooled risk differences (RDs) of 0.00 (95%CI, - 0.01 to 0.01), 0.01 (95%CI - 0.01 to 0.03), - 0.00 (95%CI -0.01 to 0.01), 0.00 (95%CI - 0.02 to 0.02), 0.01 (95%CI -0.01 to 0.03) and 0.01 (95%CI -0.02 to 0.04) for adalimumab, certolizumab, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab and non-TNF inhibitors respectively. There are also no significant effect of biologics on serious infections was observed compared with controls in patients with AS (p = 0.29) and nr-axSpA (p = 0.89). The use of biologics among patients with AS and nr-axSpA included in RCTs was not significantly associated with an increased risk of serious infections compared with placebo or NSAIDs or DMARDs.
本研究旨在定量评估生物制剂治疗的中轴型脊柱关节炎(axSpA)和非放射学中轴型脊柱关节炎(nr-axSpA)患者发生严重感染的风险。通过对 MEDLINE(通过 PubMed)、EMBASE、 Cochrane 图书馆以及美国风湿病学会(ACR)和欧洲抗风湿病联盟(EULAR)年会摘要档案进行系统文献检索,检索时间截至 2015 年 10 月。我们选择了 25 项 RCT 进行分析,这些 RCT 比较了生物制剂治疗 axSpA 或 nr-axSpA 与安慰剂和/或非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)和/或传统改善病情抗风湿药(DMARDs)的安全性,随访时间至少为 12 周。这 25 项 RCT 共纳入了 2403 例患者的数据,其中 21 项研究纳入了活动期 axSpA 患者,4 项研究纳入了 nr-axSpA 患者。这些患者接受了 5 种 TNF 抑制剂(阿达木单抗、依那西普、戈利木单抗、英夫利昔单抗和 Certolizumab)和 3 种非 TNF 抑制剂(Sarilumab、托珠单抗和 Secukinumab)治疗。与对照组相比,接受生物制剂治疗的 axSpA 和 nr-axSpA 患者严重感染的风险并无差异,且数值上略有增加(OR=1.42;95%CI 0.58-3.47)。分层分析得出的累积风险差异(RD)分别为 0.00(95%CI,-0.01 至 0.01)、0.01(95%CI -0.01 至 0.03)、-0.00(95%CI -0.01 至 0.01)、0.00(95%CI -0.02 至 0.02)、0.01(95%CI -0.01 至 0.03)和 0.01(95%CI -0.02 至 0.04),分别对应阿达木单抗、Certolizumab、依那西普、戈利木单抗、英夫利昔单抗和非 TNF 抑制剂。与对照组相比,生物制剂治疗 axSpA(p=0.29)和 nr-axSpA(p=0.89)患者的严重感染也无显著影响。在 RCT 中纳入的 axSpA 和 nr-axSpA 患者使用生物制剂与安慰剂或 NSAIDs 或 DMARDs 相比,严重感染风险无显著增加。