Karacan C Özgen, Olea Ricardo A
USGS, Reston, VA, USA.
NIOSH, PMRD, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
J Geochem Explor. 2018 Mar;186:24-35. doi: 10.1016/j.gexplo.2017.11.022.
Chemical properties of coal largely determine coal handling, processing, beneficiation methods, and design of coal-fired power plants. Furthermore, these properties impact coal strength, coal blending during mining, as well as coal's gas content, which is important for mining safety. In order for these processes and quantitative predictions to be successful, safer, and economically feasible, it is important to determine and map chemical properties of coals accurately in order to infer these properties prior to mining. Ultimate analysis quantifies principal chemical elements in coal. These elements are C, H, N, S, O, and, depending on the basis, ash, and/or moisture. The basis for the data is determined by the condition of the sample at the time of analysis, with an "as-received" basis being the closest to sampling conditions and thus to the in-situ conditions of the coal. The parts determined or calculated as the result of ultimate analyses are compositions, reported in weight percent, and pose the challenges of statistical analyses of compositional data. The treatment of parts using proper compositional methods may be even more important in mapping them, as most mapping methods carry uncertainty due to partial sampling as well. In this work, we map the ultimate analyses parts of the Springfield coal from an Indiana section of the Illinois basin, USA, using sequential Gaussian simulation of isometric log-ratio transformed compositions. We compare the results with those of direct simulations of compositional parts. We also compare the implications of these approaches in calculating other properties using correlations to identify the differences and consequences. Although the study here is for coal, the methods described in the paper are applicable to any situation involving compositional data and its mapping.
煤的化学性质在很大程度上决定了煤炭的处理、加工、选矿方法以及燃煤电厂的设计。此外,这些性质还会影响煤的强度、开采过程中的配煤情况以及煤的瓦斯含量,而瓦斯含量对采矿安全至关重要。为了使这些过程和定量预测取得成功、更安全且经济可行,在开采前准确测定和绘制煤的化学性质以推断这些性质非常重要。元素分析可对煤中的主要化学元素进行量化。这些元素包括碳(C)、氢(H)、氮(N)、硫(S)、氧(O),以及根据分析基准而定的灰分和/或水分。数据的基准由分析时样品的状态决定,“收到基”最接近采样条件,因此也最接近煤的原位条件。元素分析所确定或计算出的部分为成分,以重量百分比报告,这给成分数据的统计分析带来了挑战。在绘制这些成分时,使用适当的成分方法进行处理可能更为重要,因为大多数绘制方法也会因部分采样而存在不确定性。在这项工作中,我们使用等距对数比变换成分的序贯高斯模拟,绘制了美国伊利诺伊盆地印第安纳部分地区斯普林菲尔德煤的元素分析部分。我们将结果与成分部分的直接模拟结果进行了比较。我们还比较了这些方法在利用相关性计算其他性质时的影响,以确定差异和后果。尽管这里的研究是针对煤的,但本文所述方法适用于任何涉及成分数据及其绘制的情况。