• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

替代传统厌氧消化原料的食物垃圾的生命周期环境影响。

Life cycle environmental impacts of substituting food wastes for traditional anaerobic digestion feedstocks.

机构信息

Centre for Advanced Sustainable Energy (CASE), David Keir Building, Stranmillis Road, Belfast BT9 5AG, Northern Ireland, UK; School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Queen's University Belfast, David Keir Building, Stranmillis Road, BT9 5AG Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK.

Centre for Advanced Sustainable Energy (CASE), David Keir Building, Stranmillis Road, Belfast BT9 5AG, Northern Ireland, UK; School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Queen's University Belfast, David Keir Building, Stranmillis Road, BT9 5AG Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK.

出版信息

Waste Manag. 2018 Mar;73:140-155. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.12.023. Epub 2017 Dec 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.wasman.2017.12.023
PMID:29291908
Abstract

In this study, life cycle assessment has been used to evaluate life cycle environmental impacts of substituting traditional anaerobic digestion (AD) feedstocks with food wastes. The results have demonstrated the avoided GHG emissions from substituting traditional AD feedstocks with food waste (avoided GHG-eq emissions of 163.33 CO-eq). Additionally, the analysis has included environmental benefits of avoided landfilling of food wastes and digestate use as a substitute for synthetic fertilisers. The analysis of the GHG mitigation benefits of resource management/circular economy policies, namely, the mandating of a ban on the landfilling of food wastes, has demonstrated the very substantial GHG emission reduction that can be achieved by these policy options - 2151.04 kg CO eq per MWh relative to UK Grid. In addition to the reduction in GHG emission, the utilization of food waste for AD instead of landfilling can manage the leakage of nutrients to water resources and eliminate eutrophication impacts which occur, typically as the result of field application. The results emphasise the benefits of using life-cycle thinking to underpin policy development and the implications for this are discussed with a particular focus on the analysis of policy development across the climate, renewable energy, resource management and bioeconomy nexus and recommendations made for future research priorities.

摘要

在这项研究中,生命周期评估被用于评估用食物垃圾替代传统厌氧消化(AD)原料的生命周期环境影响。结果表明,用食物垃圾替代传统 AD 原料可避免温室气体排放(避免的温室气体当量排放为 163.33 千克 CO2 当量)。此外,该分析还包括避免食物垃圾填埋和消化物用作合成肥料替代品所带来的环境效益。对资源管理/循环经济政策(即禁止食物垃圾填埋)的温室气体减排效益的分析表明,这些政策选择可实现大量的温室气体减排——相对于英国电网,每兆瓦时可减排 2151.04 千克 CO2 当量。除了减少温室气体排放外,用 AD 处理食物垃圾而不是填埋可控制营养物质向水资源的渗漏,并消除通常由田间应用引起的富营养化影响。研究结果强调了运用生命周期思维为政策制定提供支持的益处,并特别讨论了这一方法对气候、可再生能源、资源管理和生物经济交叉领域的政策制定的影响,并为未来的研究重点提出了建议。

相似文献

1
Life cycle environmental impacts of substituting food wastes for traditional anaerobic digestion feedstocks.替代传统厌氧消化原料的食物垃圾的生命周期环境影响。
Waste Manag. 2018 Mar;73:140-155. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.12.023. Epub 2017 Dec 29.
2
Environmental sustainability of anaerobic digestion of household food waste.户用食物垃圾厌氧消化的环境可持续性。
J Environ Manage. 2019 Apr 15;236:798-814. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.02.001. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
3
Environmental balance of the UK biogas sector: An evaluation by consequential life cycle assessment.英国沼气部门的环境平衡:基于影响生命周期评估的评价。
Sci Total Environ. 2016 Aug 1;560-561:241-53. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.236. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
4
Mitigating the environmental impacts of milk production via anaerobic digestion of manure: case study of a dairy farm in the Po Valley.通过粪污厌氧消化缓解牛奶生产的环境影响:以波河谷的一个奶牛场为例。
Sci Total Environ. 2014 May 15;481:196-208. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.02.038. Epub 2014 Mar 2.
5
Mitigation of global greenhouse gas emissions from waste: conclusions and strategies from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report. Working Group III (Mitigation).减少废弃物产生的全球温室气体排放:政府间气候变化专门委员会(IPCC)第四次评估报告的结论与策略。第三工作组(减缓气候变化)
Waste Manag Res. 2008 Feb;26(1):11-32. doi: 10.1177/0734242X07088433.
6
Assessment and projection of environmental impacts of food waste treatment in China from life cycle perspectives.基于生命周期视角评估和预测中国食品废物处理的环境影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Feb 10;807(Pt 1):150751. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150751. Epub 2021 Oct 5.
7
Evaluating greenhouse gas impacts of organic waste management options using life cycle assessment.运用生命周期评估方法评价有机废物管理方案的温室气体影响。
Waste Manag Res. 2012 Aug;30(8):800-12. doi: 10.1177/0734242X12440479. Epub 2012 May 15.
8
Anaerobic co-digestion of recalcitrant agricultural wastes: Characterizing of biochemical parameters of digestate and its impacts on soil ecosystem.农业废弃物的厌氧共消化:消化液生化参数的特性及其对土壤生态系统的影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2017 May 15;586:746-752. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.02.051. Epub 2017 Feb 14.
9
Environmental sustainability in the food-energy-water-health nexus: A new methodology and an application to food waste in a circular economy.食品-能源-水-健康关系中的环境可持续性:一种新方法及其在循环经济中食物浪费问题上的应用。
Waste Manag. 2020 Jul 15;113:359-368. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.06.012. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
10
Life cycle environmental impacts of biogas production and utilisation substituting for grid electricity, natural gas grid and transport fuels.沼气生产和利用替代电网电力、天然气网和运输燃料的生命周期环境影响。
Waste Manag. 2019 Jul 15;95:90-101. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.05.045. Epub 2019 Jun 10.