Suppr超能文献

替代传统厌氧消化原料的食物垃圾的生命周期环境影响。

Life cycle environmental impacts of substituting food wastes for traditional anaerobic digestion feedstocks.

机构信息

Centre for Advanced Sustainable Energy (CASE), David Keir Building, Stranmillis Road, Belfast BT9 5AG, Northern Ireland, UK; School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Queen's University Belfast, David Keir Building, Stranmillis Road, BT9 5AG Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK.

Centre for Advanced Sustainable Energy (CASE), David Keir Building, Stranmillis Road, Belfast BT9 5AG, Northern Ireland, UK; School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Queen's University Belfast, David Keir Building, Stranmillis Road, BT9 5AG Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK.

出版信息

Waste Manag. 2018 Mar;73:140-155. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.12.023. Epub 2017 Dec 29.

Abstract

In this study, life cycle assessment has been used to evaluate life cycle environmental impacts of substituting traditional anaerobic digestion (AD) feedstocks with food wastes. The results have demonstrated the avoided GHG emissions from substituting traditional AD feedstocks with food waste (avoided GHG-eq emissions of 163.33 CO-eq). Additionally, the analysis has included environmental benefits of avoided landfilling of food wastes and digestate use as a substitute for synthetic fertilisers. The analysis of the GHG mitigation benefits of resource management/circular economy policies, namely, the mandating of a ban on the landfilling of food wastes, has demonstrated the very substantial GHG emission reduction that can be achieved by these policy options - 2151.04 kg CO eq per MWh relative to UK Grid. In addition to the reduction in GHG emission, the utilization of food waste for AD instead of landfilling can manage the leakage of nutrients to water resources and eliminate eutrophication impacts which occur, typically as the result of field application. The results emphasise the benefits of using life-cycle thinking to underpin policy development and the implications for this are discussed with a particular focus on the analysis of policy development across the climate, renewable energy, resource management and bioeconomy nexus and recommendations made for future research priorities.

摘要

在这项研究中,生命周期评估被用于评估用食物垃圾替代传统厌氧消化(AD)原料的生命周期环境影响。结果表明,用食物垃圾替代传统 AD 原料可避免温室气体排放(避免的温室气体当量排放为 163.33 千克 CO2 当量)。此外,该分析还包括避免食物垃圾填埋和消化物用作合成肥料替代品所带来的环境效益。对资源管理/循环经济政策(即禁止食物垃圾填埋)的温室气体减排效益的分析表明,这些政策选择可实现大量的温室气体减排——相对于英国电网,每兆瓦时可减排 2151.04 千克 CO2 当量。除了减少温室气体排放外,用 AD 处理食物垃圾而不是填埋可控制营养物质向水资源的渗漏,并消除通常由田间应用引起的富营养化影响。研究结果强调了运用生命周期思维为政策制定提供支持的益处,并特别讨论了这一方法对气候、可再生能源、资源管理和生物经济交叉领域的政策制定的影响,并为未来的研究重点提出了建议。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验