From the Departments of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine.
Thoracic Surgery, Medical Centre Cologne-Merheim, University Witten/Herdecke, Cologne, Germany.
Anesth Analg. 2018 Apr;126(4):1257-1261. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002753.
Supraglottic airway devices (SADs) may have advantages over endotracheal intubation for tracheal resection and reconstruction in cases of severe and proximally located subglottic stenosis. This retrospective case series examines the feasibility of using SADs as a novel approach to airway management in tracheal resections.
All patients who were managed with SADs for cervical tracheal resection and reconstruction during the study period (2010-2015) in our university hospital were included.To examine the feasibility of airway management with SADs for tracheal resection, medical records were obtained from our institution's electronic database and reviewed.
SADs were used in 10 patients who had extensive tracheal stenosis and a high prevalence of severe comorbidities. SAD insertion and subsequent positive pressure ventilation were successful in all patients, although 1 patient with preoperative respiratory failure had persistent hypercarbia. During the phase of resection and reconstruction, high-frequency jet ventilation was used to ensure adequate oxygenation. There were no intraoperative complications related to anesthetic management, apart from transient hypercarbia during and after jet ventilation. Most patients (n = 6; 60%) had an uneventful postoperative course. In this high-risk cohort, postoperative complications (ie, vocal cord edema, postoperative hemorrhage, pneumonia) occurred in 4 patients (40%).
This retrospective case series demonstrates the feasibility of using supraglottic airways alongside high-frequency jet ventilation for airway management in at least some cases of cervical tracheal resection and reconstruction. However, the small number of cases examined limits conclusions regarding indications, contraindications, and periprocedural safety.
对于严重且近段声门下狭窄的病例,相较于气管插管,使用声门上气道装置(SAD)进行气管切除术和重建可能具有优势。本回顾性病例系列研究考察了 SAD 作为一种新型气道管理方法用于气管切除术的可行性。
纳入了 2010 年至 2015 年期间在我院接受 SAD 治疗的所有接受颈段气管切除术和重建的患者。为了检验使用 SAD 进行气管切除术的气道管理可行性,我们从医院电子数据库中获取了病历并进行了回顾。
10 例广泛气管狭窄且合并严重合并症的患者使用了 SAD。尽管 1 例术前呼吸衰竭患者持续存在高碳酸血症,但所有患者均成功插入 SAD 并进行了正压通气。在切除和重建阶段,使用高频喷射通气以确保充足的氧合。除了在喷射通气期间和之后短暂发生高碳酸血症外,麻醉管理无术中并发症。大多数患者(n = 6;60%)术后无并发症。在这一高危患者队列中,4 例(40%)患者发生了术后并发症(即声带水肿、术后出血、肺炎)。
本回顾性病例系列研究表明,在至少某些颈段气管切除术和重建病例中,联合高频喷射通气使用声门上气道装置进行气道管理是可行的。但是,由于病例数量较少,限制了对适应证、禁忌证和围手术期安全性的结论。